Effects of Monetary Incentives on Task Switching
Abstract
In two experiments, effects of incentives on task switching were investigated. Incentives were provided as a monetary bonus. In both experiments, the availability of a bonus varied on a trial-to-trial basis. The main difference between the experiments relates to the association of incentives to individual tasks. In Experiment 1, the association of incentives to individual tasks was fixed. Under these conditions, the effect of incentives was largely due to reward expectancy. Switch costs were reduced to statistical insignificance. This was true even with the task that was not associated with a bonus. In Experiment 2, there was a variable association of incentives to individual tasks. Under these conditions, the reward expectancy effect was bound to conditions with a well-established bonus-task association. In conditions in which the bonus-task association was not established in advance, enhanced performance of the bonus task was accompanied by performance decrements with the task that was not associated with a bonus. Reward expectancy affected mainly the general level of performance. The outcome of this study may also inform recently suggested neurobiological accounts about the temporal dynamics of reward processing.
References
1986). Parkinson disease: Electrophysiological (CNV) analysis related to pharmacological treatment. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 64, 521–524.
(2009). Neurocomputational models of basal ganglia function in learning, memory and choice. Behavioural Brain Research, 199, 141–156.
(2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In , Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 357–376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 343–353.
(2008). Goal neglect and Spearman’s g: Competing parts of a complex task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 131–148.
(2003). Short-term mobilisation of processing resources is revealed in the event-related potential. Psychophysiology, 40, 914–923.
(2005). Dynamic dopamine modulation in the basal ganglia: A neurocomputational account of cognitive deficits in medicated and nonmedicated Parkinsonism. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 51–72.
(2006). A mechanistic account of striatal dopamine function in human cognition: Psychopharmacological studies with cabergoline and haloperidol. Behavioral Neuroscience, 120, 497–517.
(1973). Attention and effort. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
(2001). The time course of effort mobilization and strategic adjustments of response criteria. Psychological Research, 65, 216–223.
(in press ). Task switching with a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping: Separating cue disambiguation from task-rule retrieval. Psychological Research.2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575–599.
(2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 134–140.
(1979). On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.
(2002). Residual costs in task switching: Testing the failure-to-engage hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 86–92.
(2003). Temporal difference models and reward-related learning in the human brain. Neuron, 38, 329–337.
(1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59–108.
(2010). Enhancement of cognitive control by approach and avoidance motivation. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 338–356.
(2010). Motivated cognitive control: Reward incentives modulate preparatory neural activity during task-switching. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 10294–10305.
(1998). Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 1–27.
(2004). Temporal difference models describe higher-order learning in humans. Nature, 429, 664–667.
(2005). Monetary incentives enhance processing in brain regions mediating top-down control of action. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1855–1865.
(1999). A neural network model with dopamine-like reinforcement signal that learns a spatial delayed response task. Neuroscience, 91, 871–890.
(1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2004). Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time sharing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 795–810.
(2011). Human cognitive flexibility depends on dopamine D2 receptor signaling. Psychopharmacology, 218, 567–578.
(2007). Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: A recipe to diminish the residual switch cost. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 342–356.
(1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67–85.
(1986). Gain and energetics in information processing. In , Energetics and human information processing. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
(2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 159–177.
(2004). Genes, dopamine and cortical signal-to-noise ratio in schizophrenia. Trends in Neurosciences, 27, 683–690.
(1993). Event-related potentials associated with covert orientation of visual attention in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 31, 1283–1297.
(2006). Jumping the gun: Is effective preparation contingent upon anticipatory activation in task-relevant neural circuitry? Cerebral Cortex, 16, 394–404.
(