Skip to main content
Research Article

The Groove Move

Action Affordances Produce Fluency and Positive Affect

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000122

In two experiments we show that the experience of processing fluency can be grounded in the motor system. We manipulated whether responses in a stimulus-response paradigm were congruent or incongruent with the orientation of graspable objects. Besides the typical affordance effect (Tucker & Ellis, 1998), namely a reaction time advantage for responses made with the hand for which it would be easier to grasp the object, our results reveal that such a visuo-motor congruence elicits positive affect when preceded by incongruent trials (Experiment 1). Experiment 2 demonstrates that individuals are aware of this fluency experience and can consciously report on it. Moreover, by manipulating the task contingencies, we show that the affordance effect itself can be modulated by the experience of processing fluency. Our results are in line with theories assuming a direct coupling between perception and action (Hommel, Müsseler, Aschersleben, & Prinz, 2001; Prinz, 1997; Smith & Semin, 2004).

References

  • Alter, A. L. , Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235. doi: 10.1177/1088868309341564. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265–289. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cannon, P. R. , Hayes, A. E. , Tipper, S. P. (2010). Sensorimotor fluency influences affect: Evidence from electromyography. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 681–691. doi: 10.1080/02699930802234864 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hansen, J. , Dechêne, A. , Wänke, M. (2008). Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 687–691. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hansen, J. , Wänke, M. (2008). It’s the difference that counts: Expectancy/experience discrepancy moderates the use of ease of retrieval in attitude judgments. Social Cognition, 26, 447–468. doi: 10.1521/soco.2008.26.4.447 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Harmon-Jones, E. , Allen, J. J. B. (2001). The role of affect in the mere exposure effect: Evidence from psychophysiological and individual differences approaches. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 889–898. doi: 10.1177/0146167201277011 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hayes, A. E. , Paul, M. A. , Beuger, B. , Tipper, S. P. (2008). Self produced and observed actions influence emotion: The roles of action fluency and eye gaze. Psychological Research, 72, 461–472. doi: 10.1007/s00426-007-0125-3 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Hommel, B. , Müsseler, J. , Aschersleben, G. , Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–937. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Hommel, B. , Proctor, R. W. , Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1–17. doi: 10.1037/a0019326 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Jacoby, L. L. , Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126–135. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.126 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Laham, S. M. , Alter, A. L. , Goodwin, G. P. (2009). Easy on the mind, easy on the wrongdoer: Discrepantly fluent violations are deemed less morally wrong. Cognition, 112, 462–466. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.06.001 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Murphy, S. T. , Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723–739. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154. doi: 10.1080/713752551 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reber, R. , Winkielman, P. , Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schwarz, N. (2011). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. van Lange, A. Kruglanski, E. T. Higgins (Ed.), Handbook of theories of social psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor, T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Smith, E. R. , Semin, G. R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 53–117. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36002-8 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Song, H. , Schwarz, N. (2008). If it’s hard to read, it’s hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science, 19, 986–988. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Stürmer, B. , Leuthold, H. , Soetens, E. , Schröter, H. , Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.6.1345 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Symes, E. , Ellis, R. , Tucker, M. (2007). Visual object affordances: Object orientation. Acta Psychologica, 124, 238–255. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.005 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Tucker, M. , Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Tucker, M. , Ellis, R. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8, 769–800. doi: 10.1080/13506280042000144 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tucker, M. , Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116, 185–203. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.01.004 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A. (2004). The perception of integrality: Remembering through the validation of expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 891–908. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.891 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A. , Jacoby, L. L. , Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 716–732. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(90)90045-2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A. , Williams, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers seem familiar, but friends do not? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica, 98, 141–165. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00040-1 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Whittlesea, B. W. A. , Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Behavior, 26, 547–565. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.547 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Willems, S. , Van der Linden, M. (2006). Mere exposure effect: A consequence of direct and indirect fluency-preference links. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 323–341. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.06.008 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Winkielman, P. , Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 989–1000. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Winkielman, P. , Schwarz, N. , Fazendeiro, T. A. , Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch, K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Winkielman, P. , Schwarz, N. , Nowak, A. (2002). Affect and processing dynamics. In S. Moore, M. Oaksford (Eds.), Emotional Cognition. From brain to behavior (pp. 111–135). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1–27. doi: 10.1037/h0025848 First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar