Across-Notation Automatic Processing of Two-Digit Numbers
Abstract
The existence of across-notation automatic numerical processing of two-digit (2D) numbers was explored using size comparisons tasks. Participants were Arabic speakers, who use two sets of numerical symbols – Arabic and Indian. They were presented with pairs of 2D numbers in the same or in mixed notations. Responses for a numerical comparison task were affected by decade difference and unit-decade compatibility and global distance in both conditions, extending previous findings with Arabic digits (Nuerk, Weger, & Willmes, 2001). Responses for a physical comparison task were affected by congruency with the numerical size, as indicated by the size congruency effect (SiCE). The SiCE was affected by unit-decade compatibility but not by global distance, thus suggesting that the units and decades digits of the 2D numbers, but not the whole number value were automatically translated into a common representation of magnitude. The presence of similar results for same- and mixed-notation pairs supports the idea of an abstract representation of magnitude.
References
(1995). Arabic number reading: On the nature of the number scale and the origin of the phonological recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 434–452.
(2005). Architectures for Arithmetics. In , Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 347–360). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
(2008). Are Arabic and verbal numbers processed in different ways?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1377–1391.
(2009). Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: Abstract or not abstract?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 313–373.
(1995). Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 314–326.
(1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626–641.
(2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487–506.
(1984). Mental comparisons of size and magnitude: Size congruity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 442–453.
(2009). Comparing two-digit numbers: The importance of being presented together. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 444–452.
(2008). Across-notation automatic numerical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 430–437.
(2007). Automaticity and two-digit numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 483–496.
(2002). The characteristics of Arabic orthography slow its processing. Neuropsychology, 16, 322–326.
(2006). The involvement of the inferior parietal cortex in the numerical Stroop effect and the distance effect in a two-digit number comparison task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1518–1530.
(1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 149–157.
(1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia. Cognition, 44, 107–157.
(1993). Arabic number reading deficit: A single case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 317–339.
(2001). Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins. Cognition, 82, B25–B33.
(2002). A unit-decade compatibility effect in German number words. Current Psychology Letters, 7, 19–38.
(2005). Language effects in magnitude comparison: Small, but not irrelevant. Brain and Language, 92, 262–277.
(2005). The universal SNARC effect. Experimental Psychology, 52, 187–194.
(1999). Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line. Cognition, 72, 191–201.
(2004). Cross-notation number priming investigated at different stimulus onset asynchronies in parity and naming tasks. Experimental Psychology, 51, 110–111.
(2002). Semantic priming in number naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1127–1139.
(2002). Automatic stimulus-response associations may be semantically mediated. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 107–112.
(2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
(2005). Two-digit comparison: decomposed, holistic, or hybrid?. Experimental Psychology, 52, 195–200.
(2005). The effect of external representations on numeric tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 817–838.
