Under- and Over-Estimation
A Bi-Directional Mapping Process Between Symbolic and Non-Symbolic Representations of Number?
Abstract
Over the last 30 years, numerical estimation has been largely studied. Recently, Castronovo and Seron (2007) proposed the bi-directional mapping hypothesis in order to account for the finding that dependent on the type of estimation task (perception vs. production of numerosities), reverse patterns of performance are found (i.e., under- and over-estimation, respectively). Here, we further investigated this hypothesis by submitting adult participants to three types of numerical estimation task: (1) a perception task, in which participants had to estimate the numerosity of a non-symbolic collection; (2) a production task, in which participants had to approximately produce the numerosity of a symbolic numerical input; and (3) a reproduction task, in which participants had to reproduce the numerosity of a non-symbolic numerical input. Our results gave further support to the finding that different patterns of performance are found according to the type of estimation task: (1) under-estimation in the perception task; (2) over-estimation in the production task; and (3) accurate estimation in the reproduction task. Moreover, correlation analyses revealed that the more a participant under-estimated in the perception task, the more he/she over-estimated in the production task. We discussed these empirical data by showing how they can be accounted by the bi-directional mapping hypothesis (Castronovo & Seron, 2007).
References
1991). Occupancy model of perceived numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 303–314.
(1964). Assimilation and contrast in the estimation of number. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 458–462.
(1974). Comparison of digit and dot patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 1131–1136.
(1988). An encoding complex view of cognitive number processing: Comment on McCloskey, Sokol, and Goodman (1986). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 204–214.
(2007). Numerical estimation in blind subjects: Evidence of the impact of blindness and its following experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1089–1106.
(1995). Toward a multiroute model of number processing: Impaired number transcoding with preserved calculation skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 124, 375–390.
(1991). A specific deficit for numbers in a case of dense acalculia. Brain, 114, 2619–2637.
(2000). Language and calculation within the parietal lobe: A combined cognitive, anatomical and fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1426–1440.
(2008). Numerical representation: Abstract or nonabstract? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1160–1168.
(2007). Notation-dependent and independent representations of numbers in the parietal lobes. Neuron, 53, 307–314.
(2009). Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: Abstract or not abstract?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 313–328.
(2001). Variability signatures distinguish verbal from non-verbal counting for both large and small numbers. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 698–707.
(1992). The organization of arithmetic facts in memory: Evidence from a brain-damaged patient. Brain and Cognition, 20, 345–366.
(1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1–42.
(1997). The number sense. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2001). Précis of the number sense. Mind and Language, 16, 16–36.
(2003). The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: A logarithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 145–147.
(1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 83–120.
(1997). Cerebral pathways for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic. Cortex, 33, 219–250.
(2005). Control over non-numerical parameters in numerosity experiments. Unpublished manuscript. Available: www.unicog.org.
(2008). Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science, 30, 1217–1220.
(1997). Arithmetic facts without meaning. Cortex, 33, 697–710.
(1995). Texture density adaptation and the perceived numerosity and distribution of texture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 149–169.
(1972). The solitaire illusion: An illusion of numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 409–410.
(1992). Pre-verbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43–74.
(2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 59–65.
(1980). The regular-random numerosity illusion: Rectangular patterns. The Journal of General Psychology, 103, 211–216.
(2004). Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science, 306, 496–499.
(2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the “Number Sense”: The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1457–1465.
(2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement. Nature, 455, 665–668.
(2009). Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: The numerical distance effect and individual differences in children’s mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 17–29.
(2010). Common and segregated neural pathways for the processing of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 49, 1006–1017.
(1977). Scaling of dot numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 265–276.
(2008). Calibrating the mental number line. Cognition, 106, 1221–1247.
(1949). The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology, 62, 498–525.
(1999). Primed numbers: Exploring the modularity of numerical representations with masked and unmasked semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1882–1905.
(1972). Perceived numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 5–9.
(1982). Single judgments of numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 175–182.
(1984). Perceived numerosity: A comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 536–542.
(1989). Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Toward a unified psychophysical law. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 251–320.
(2005). Preschool children’s mapping of number words to non-symbolic numerosities. Child Development, 76, 978–988.
(1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 1–22.
(1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519–1520.
(2009). Children’s mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 490–502.
(2000). Number processing and calculation in a case of visual agnosia. Cortex, 36, 377–400.
(2007). A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 53, 293–305.
(2004). Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science, 306, 499–503.
(2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14, 237–243.
(1953). On the brightness of lights and the loudness of sounds. Science, 118, 576.
(1955). The measurement of loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 815–829.
(1957). On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 64, 153–181.
(1966). Matching functions between loudness and ten other continua. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 5–8.
(1966). Regression effect in psychophysical judgment. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 439–446.
(1973). Range effects in psychophysical scaling and a revision of Steven’s law. The American Journal of Psychology, 86, 3–27.
(1978). Range and regression effects in magnitude scaling. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 305–314.
(1982). A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 163–170.
(2005). A model of exact small-number representation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 66–80.
(1999). Non-verbal counting in humans: The psychophysics of number representation. Psychological Science, 10, 130–137.
(