Spatial Cues Affect Mental Number Line Bisections
Abstract
Numerical magnitude is coded left-to-right along a mental number line (MNL). The MNL can be distorted by an attentional bias directed to the left side, known as pseudoneglect – making the left of the MNL appear longer. We investigated whether this distortion can be corrected using spatial cues. Participants (n = 17) made forced-choice discriminations of relative numerical length while spatial cues were presented to the left, right, and both sides. Overall, participants overestimated the leftward length of the MNL, consistent with the effect of pseudoneglect. The bias was present for left- and neutral-cues, but was eliminated by right-cues. The results demonstrate that low-level manipulation of attention in physical space affects attention for high-level mental representations. The effect of cueing may reflect common activation of overlapping neural circuits that are thought to underlie attention in physical and representational space.
References
(2005). Time to imagine space: A chronometric exploration of representational neglect. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1249–1257.
(2003). Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Neuropsychologia, 41, 493–503.
(1980). Pseudoneglect: Effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia, 18, 491–498.
(2007). Temporal order judgements reveal how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention. Cognition, 102, 101–117.
(2006). Abrupt onsets cannot be ignored. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 875–880.
(1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.
(2003). Parietal control of visuospatial attention: Line bisection judgments evaluated with high-density electrical mapping and source analysis. NeuroImage, 19, 710–726.
(2006). Number magnitudes orients attention, but not against one’s will. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 869–874.
(2006). Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Acta Psychologica, 122, 221–233.
(2006). Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: Simulating “spatial” neglect in healthy subjects. Neuropsychologia, 44, 860–868.
(2002). Sex differences in line bisection as a function of hand. Neuropsychologia, 40, 235–240.
(2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(6), 435–448.
(2004). Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory & Cognition, 32, 662–673.
(2000). Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 93–110.
(2005). Psychophysical evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in the response selection stage. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 48–56.
(2005). An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of voluntary and stimulus-driven orienting of attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 4593–4604.
(2008). Left to right: Representational biases for numbers and the effect of visuomotor adaptation. Cognition, 107, 1048–1058.
(2009). Pseudoneglect for the bisection of mental number lines. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 925–945.
(2007). Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1400–1407.
(2005). A common origin for the effects of unilateral cueing and line geometry in the modulation of pseudoneglect. Cortex, 41, 499–511.
(1999). Visuospatial attention in line bisection: Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect. Neuropsychologia, 37, 843–855.
(1989). Selective spatial attention and length representation in normal subjects and in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. Brain and Cognition, 9, 57–70.
(2008). Look, no hands: A perceptual task shows that number magnitude induces shifts of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 413–418.
(2002). Pseudoneglect: A scanning, pre-motor or attentional bias? Cortex, 38, 113–136.
(1971). The assessment of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–133.
(2002). Effects of visible and invisible cueing on line bisection and Landmark performance in hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychologia, 40, 282–290.
(2005). Applications of prism adaptation: A tutorial in theory and method. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 431–444.
(2004). Does action make the link between number and space representation? Psychological Science, 15(6), 426–430.
(2008). Visuospatial priming of the mental number line. Cognition, 106, 770–779.
(2006). Differential influences of prism adaptation on reflexive and voluntary covert attention. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 337–349.
(1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83–90.
(2006). The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: Evidence from Neglect. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1061–1067.
(2002). Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 417, 138–139.
