Skip to main content
Editorial

Experimental Psychology

A Note on Statistical Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000001
Free first page

References

  • American Psychological Association . (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Baayen, R. H. , Davidson, D. J. , Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412, doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bar-Anan, Y. , Nosek, B. A. , Vianello, M. (2009). The sorting paired features task: A measure of association strengths. Experimental Psychology, 56, 329–343, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.5.329. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Bianchi, M. , Machunsky, M. , Steffens, M. C. , Mummendey, A. (2009). Like me or like us: Is ingroup projection just social projection? Experimental Psychology, 56, 198–205, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.198. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Bredenkamp, J. (1969). Über die Anwendung des Signifikanztests bei theorietestenden Experimenten [Application of significance tests in theory-testing experiments]. Psychologische Beiträge, 11, 275–285. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bredenkamp, J. (1972). Der Signifikanztest in der psychologischen Forschung [The significance test in psychological research] Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cumming, G. , Fidler, F. (2009). Confidence intervals: Better answers to better questions. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 15–26, doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.1.15. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Curran-Everett, D. , & Benos, D. J. (2004). Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society. Advances in Physiology Education, 28, 85–87, doi: 10.1152/advan.00019.2004. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Deroost, N. , Coomans, D. , Soetens, E. (2009). Perceptual load improves the expression but not learning of relevant sequence information. Experimental Psychology, 56, 84–91, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.2.84. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Deutsch, R. , Kordts-Freudinger, R. , Gawronski, B. , Strack, F. (2009). Fast and fragile: A new look at the automaticity of negation processing. Experimental Psychology, 56, 434–446, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.6.434. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Duyck, W. , Warlop, N. (2009). Translation priming between the native language and a second language. Experimental Psychology, 56, 173–179, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.173. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Erdfelder, E. (1984). Zur Bedeutung und Kontrolle des beta-Fehlers bei der inferenzstatistischen Prüfung log-linearer Modelle [On significance and control of beta errors in statistical tests of log-linear models] Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 15, 18–32. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Erdfelder, E. , Auer, T. S. , Hilbig, B. E. , Aßfalg, A. , Moshagen, M. , Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 108–124, doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.108. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Evans, J. S. B. T. , Handley, S. J. , Bacon, A. M. (2009). Reasoning under time pressure: A study of causal conditional inference. Experimental Psychology, 56, 188–197, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.2.77. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Faul, F. , Erdfelder, E. , Buchner, A. , Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analysis using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Fidler, F. , Loftus, G. R. (2009). Why figures with error bars should replace p values: Some conceptual arguments and empirical demonstrations. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 27–37, doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.1.27. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Jescheniak, J. D. , Oppermann, F. , Hantsch, A. , Wagner, V. , Mädebach, A. , Schriefers, H. (2009). Do perceived context pictures automatically activate their phonological code?. Experimental Psychology, 56, 56–65, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.56. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Johansson, T. (2009). Strengthening the case for stimulus-specificity in artificial grammar learning: No evidence for abstract representations with extended exposure. Experimental Psychology, 56, 188–197, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.188. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Kaufmann, M. , Betsch, T. (2009). Origins of the sample size effect in explicit evaluative judgment. Experimental Psychology, 56, 344–353, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.5.344. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Koele, P. (1982). Calculating power in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 513–516. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lemhöfer, K. , Radach, R. (2009). Task context effects in bilingual nonword processing. Experimental Psychology, 56, 41–47, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.41. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Locker, L. , Hoffman, L. , Bovaird, J. A. (2007). On the use of multilevel modeling as an alternative to items analysis in psycholinguistic research. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 723–730. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Machunsky, M. , Meiser, T. , & Mummendey, A. (2009). On the crucial role of the mental ingroup representation for ingroup bias and the ingroup prototypicality-ingroup bias link. Experimental Psychology, 56, 156–164, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.156. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Marewski, J. N. , & Olsson, H. (2009). Beyond the null ritual: Formal modeling of psychological processes. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 49–60, doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.1.49. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Martin, D. , Nind, L. K. , Macrae, C. N. (2009). Lateralized repetition priming for unfamiliar faces. Experimental Psychology, 56, 147–155, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.3.147. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Melton, A. W. (1962). Editorial. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 553–557. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Öllinger, M. , Jones, G. , Knoblich, G. (2008). Investigating the effect of mental set on insight problem solving. Experimental Psychology, 55, 269–282, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.4.269. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Perea, M. , Dunabeitia, J. A. , Carreiras, M. (2008). Transposed-letter priming effects for close versus distant transpositions. Experimental Psychology, 55, 384–393, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.384. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2003). A further look at “the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 141–151. First citation in articleCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

  • Raaijmakers, J. G. W. , Schrijnemakers, J. M. C. , Gremmen, F. (1999). How to deal with “the language-as-fixed-effect fallacy”: Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 416–426. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Rosnow, R. L. , & Rosenthal, R. (2009). Effect sizes: Why, when, and how to use them. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 6–14, doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.1.6. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Rouder, J. N. , Speckman, P. L. , Sun, D. C. , Morey, R. D. , Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237, doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.225. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Stahl, C. , Meiser, T. (2009). New directions in multinomial modeling. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 105–107, doi: 10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.105. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Sugrue, K. , Strange, D. , Hayne, H. (2009). False memories in the DRM paradigm: Age-related differences in lure activation and source monitoring. Experimental Psychology, 56, 354–360, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.5.354. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Vainio, S. , Hyönä, J. , Pajunen, A. (2009). Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading. Experimental Psychology, 56, 66–74, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.66. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Welvaert, M. , Farioli, F. , Grainger, J. (2008). Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming. Experimental Psychology, 55, 54–63, doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.1.54. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Westermann, R. , & Hager, W. (1986). Error probabilities in educational and psychological research. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 117–146. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wetzels, R. , Raaijmakers, J. G. W. , Jakab, E. , Wagenmakers, E. J. (2009). How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: A flexible WinBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian t test. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225–237, doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.4.752. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wilkinson, L. , The Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar