Abstract
Van den Bussche and Reynvoet (2007) argued that since significant priming was observed for novel primes from a large category, subliminal primes can be processed semantically. However, a possible confound in this study was the presence of nonsemantic effects such as orthographic overlap between primes and targets. Therefore, the first aim of this study was to validate our previous claim when nonsemantic influences are avoided. The second aim was to investigate the impact of nonsemantic stimulus processing on priming effects by manipulating target set size. The results showed that when nonsemantic effects are eliminated by presenting primes as pictures and targets as words, significant priming emerged for large stimulus categories and a large target set. This cannot be explained by nonsemantic accounts of subliminal processing and shows that subliminal primes can be truly semantically processed. However, when using a limited amount of targets, stimulating nonsemantic processing, priming disappeared. This indicates that the task context will determine whether stimuli will be processed semantically or nonsemantically, which in turn can influence priming effects.
References
(2008). Orthographic overlap and category size in unconscious category priming: Comment on Van den Bussche and Reynvoet’s (2007) experiment 1c. Experimental Psychology, 55, 350–357.
(2000). Parts outweigh the whole (word) in unconscious analysis of meaning. Psychological Science, 11, 118–124.
(2001). Congruity effects evoked by subliminally presented primes: Automaticity rather than semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 154–165.
(1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597–600.
(1999). Unconscious semantic priming from pictures. Cognition, 73, 1–15.
(2004). Category size effects revisited: Frequency and masked priming effects in semantic categorization. Brain and Language, 90, 276–286.
(2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In , Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 3–37). New York: Psychology Press.
(2006). Priming from novel masked stimuli depends on target set size. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2, 37–45.
(2007). Priming of semantic classifications by novel subliminal prime words. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 63–83.
(2007). Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review of visual masking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362, 857–875.
(2003). Conscious control over the content of unconscious cognition. Cognition, 88, 223–242.
(2001). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli. Cognition, 80, 223–237.
(2001). Set size and repetition matter: Comment on Caramazza and Costa (2000). Cognition, 80, 291–298.
(2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217–236.
(2007). Masked priming effects in semantic categorization are independent of category size. Experimental Psychology, 54, 225–235.
(in press). The mechanisms of masked priming: A state of the art. In , Experimental psychology research trends. New York: Nova Science.
