A Test of the Salience Asymmetry Interpretation of the Alcohol-IAT
Abstract
K. Rothermund and D. Wentura (2004) showed how Figure-Ground (FG) asymmetries produce effects on the Implicit Association Task (IAT), independent of associations. Here, the FG account was tested for the robust finding that drinkers show a negative alcohol-IAT effect while being positive on explicit measures. FG asymmetries were manipulated through familiarity of alcohol-IAT target categories and were assessed with visual search tasks. Supporting the FG account, the familiarity manipulation influenced the IAT effect in the expected direction, and the IAT effect correlated with FG asymmetries. Contrary to the FG account, however, the IAT effect was not reversed, and IAT effects were predicted by alcohol use but not by FG asymmetries. Hence, the FG account only partly explains the negative alcohol-IAT effect.
References
Beringer J. (1996). Experimental Run Time System (ERTS), Version 3.18 . Frankfurt, Germany: BeriSoftBosson J. K. , Swann W. B. , Pennebaker J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79, 631– 643Cunningham W. A. , Preacher K. J. , Banaji M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163– 170Dasgupta N. , McGhee D. E. , Greenwald A. G. , Banaji M. R. (2000). Automatic preference for white Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 316– 328De Houwer J. , Crombez G. , Koster E.H.W. , De Beul N. (2004). Implicit alcohol-related cognitions in a clinical sample of heavy drinkers. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 35, 275– 286Field M. , Mogg K. , Bradley B. P. (2006). Attention to drug- related cues in drug abuse and addiction: component processes. In R. W. Wiers, A. W. Stacy (Eds.), Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction (pp. 151-163). Thousand Oakes, CA: SageFleming M. F. , Barry K. L. , MacDonald R. (1991). The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in a college sample. The International Journal of the Addictions, 26, 1173– 1185Greenwald A. G. , McGhee D. E. , Schwartz J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 1464– 1480Greenwald A. G. , Nosek B. A. , Banaji M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85, 197– 216Greenwald A. G. , Nosek B. A. , Banaji M. R. , Klauer K. C. (2005). Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the IAT: Comment on Rothermund and Wentura (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 420– 425Hofmann W. , Gawronski B. , Gschwendner T. , Le H. , Schmitt M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369– 1385Houben K. , Wiers R. W. (2006). Assessing implicit alcohol associations with the IAT: Fact or artifact? Addictive Behaviors . 31, 1346– 1362Nosek B. A. , Greenwald A. G. , Banaji M. R. (in press) The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes. New York: Psychology PressOttaway S. A. , Hayden D.C. , Oakes M. A. (2001). Implicit attitudes and racism: Effects of word familiarity and frequency on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 19, 97– 144Poehlman T. A. , Uhlmann E. , Greenwald A. G. , Banaji M. R. (2004). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Manuscript submitted for publicationRothermund K. , Wentura D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139– 165Rothermund K. , Wentura D. , De Houwer J. (2005). Validity of the salience asymmetry account of the IAT: Reply to Greenwald, Nosek, Banaji, and Klauer (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 426– 430Rudman L. A. (2004). Sources of implicit attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 79– 82Rudman L. A. , Greenwald A. G. , Melliot D. S. , Schwartz J.L.K. (1999). Measuring the automatic components of prejudice: Flexibility and generality of the Implicit Association test. Social Cognition, 17, 437– 465Saunders J. B. , Aasland O. G. , Babor T. F. , De la Fuente J. R. , Grant M. (1993). Development of the Alcohol use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption. Addiction, 88, 791– 804Wiers R. W. , Houben K. , Smulders F. T. Y. , Conrod P. J. , Jones B. T. (2006). To drink or not to drink: The role of automatic and controlled processes in the etiology of alcohol- related problems. In R. W. Wiers, A. W. Stacy (Eds.), Handbook of Implicit Cognition and Addiction (pp. 339-361). Thousand Oaks, CA: SageWiers R. W. , van de Luitgaarden J. , van den Wildenberg E. , Smulders F.T.Y. (2005). Challenging implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in young heavy drinkers. Addiction, 100, 806– 819Wiers R. W. , Van Woerden N. , Smulders F.T.Y. , de Jong P. J. (2002). Implicit and explicit alcohol-related cognitions in heavy and light drinkers. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 648– 658Zack M. , Toneatto T. , Macleod C. M. (1999). Implicit activation of alcohol concepts by negative affective cues distinguishes between problem drinkers with high and low psychiatric distress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 518– 531
