Further Evidence that the SNARC Effect is Processed Along a Dual-Route Architecture
Evidence from the Lateralized Readiness Potential
Abstract
In a binary response setting, it has been frequently observed that small numbers are reacted to faster with the left hand and large numbers with the right hand (i. e., the SNARC-effect) which reflects the spatial left-right orientation of the mental number line (Dehaene, Bossini, & Giraux, 1993). In line with the work of Keus and Schwarz (in press), we investigated the locus of the conflict in the SNARC effect in a parity judgment task with the Arabic numerals 1, 2, 8, or 9. Differences between compatible (left-hand response to 1 or 2 and right-hand response to 8 and 9) and incompatible SNARC conditions (left-hand response to 8 or 9 and right-hand response to 1 or 2) were observed in the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) but not in the peak latency of the P300. In accordance with Keus and colleagues (Keus, Jenks, & Schwarz, 2005), we argue that the locus of the conflict is situated at intermediate response-related stages. However, instead of adopting a single-route processing architecture, a dual route account is proposed as the underlying processing architecture explaining the SNARC effect.
References
(1974). Comparison of digits and dot patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 1131– 1136
(2002). Executive control in the Simon effect: An electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66(4), 324– 336
Backward-compatibility effects with irrelevant S-R overlap: The case of the SNARC effect. Journal of General Psychology, 131(4), 411– 425
2005(1989). Modern mind-brain reading: Psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. Psychophysiology, 26, 251– 269
(1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371– 396
(1998). Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain. Trends in Neurosciences, 21(8), 355– 361
(1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731– 750
(1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 357– 427
(1998). The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30(1), 146– 156
(1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143– 149
(2001). Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Psychological Research, 65, 250– 259
(1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95– 110
(2005). Spatial representation of number. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 43-54). New York: Psychology Press.
(2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555– 556
(2005). Towards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effects. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 659– 673
The hunt for SNARC. Psychology Science,
in press(1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: Does arousal speed decision making?. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 321– 329
(1995). Response complexity and precue interval effects on the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 32, 230– 241
(1999). Effect of the irrelevant location of the response signal on choice reaction time: An electromyographic study in humans. Psychophysiology, 36(4), 522– 526
(2005). Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(1), 48– 56
Searching for the functional locus of the SNARC effect: Evidence for a response-related origin. Memory and Cognition,
in press(1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253– 270
(1980). Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials. Brain Research, 202, 95– 115
(1977). Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197, 792– 795
(2002). Semantic influences on feature-based attention due to overlap of neural circuits. Cortex, 38, 878– 882
(1996). Partial advance information and response preparation: Inferences from the lateralized readiness potential. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 307– 323
(1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 147– 207
(1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163– 203
(2003). The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?. Cognition, 88(3), B1– B10
(2000). An electrophysiological study of the locus of the interference effect in a stimulus-response compatibility paradigm. Psychophysiology, 37, 464– 472
(2004). The functional locus of the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology, 41, 1– 11
(1998). Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. Psychophysiology, 35, 99– 115
(2000). Detecting the onset of the lateralized readiness potential: a comparison of available methods and procedures. Psychophysiology, 37, 347– 360
(1996). Absence of coactivation in the motor component: Evidence from psychophysiological measures of target detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 25– 41
(1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature, 215, 1519– 1520
(1996). Unix implementation of the ERP evaluation package (EEP 3.0). In A. D. Friederici & D. Y. von Cramon (eds.), Annual report of Max-Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience (pp. 124-126). Leipzig, Germany.
(1995). Precuing effects on perceptual-motor overlap. Acta Psychologica, 90, 111– 127
Eds. (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North Holland.
(1984). Perceptual and motor space representation: An event related potential study. Psychophysiology, 21, 159– 170
(1981). P300 as a function of S-R compatibility and motor programming. Biological Psychology, 13, 289– 294
(1990). Issues and trends in the debate on discrete vs. continuous processing of information. Acta Psychologica, 74, 123– 167
(1969). Reaction toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 1974– 1976
(1990). Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: The Stroop effect vs. the Simon effect. Acta Psychologica, 73, 159– 170
(1993). The selectivity of age effects on information processing: Response times and electrophysiology. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
(1993). Covert effects of alcohol revealed by event-related potentials. Perception and Psychophysics, 54, 127– 135
(1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ Method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276– 315
(2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electropsychophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(6), 1345– 1363
(2002). The processing of numbers in choice-reaction tasks. Australian Journal of Psychology, 54, 94– 98
(1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 89-116). Amsterdam: North Holland.
(1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: an ERP study. Biological Psychology, 43, 147– 162
(2001). Influence of time pressure in a simple response task, a choice-by-location task and the Simon task. Journal of Psychophysiology, 15(4), 241– 255
(1997). On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. Psychophysiology, 34, 131– 156
(1993). Age-related differences in the timing of stimulus and response processes during visual selective attention: Performance and psychophysiological analysis. Psychophysiology, 30, 138– 151
(1995). A computational model of the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 58, 193– 205