The Universal SNARC Effect
The Association between Number Magnitude and Space is Amodal
Abstract
Abstract. It is thought that number magnitude is represented in an abstract and amodal way on a left-to-right oriented mental number line. Major evidence for this idea has been provided by the SNARC effect (Dehaene, Bossini, & Giraux, 1993): responses to relatively larger numbers are faster for the right hand, those to smaller numbers for the left hand, even when number magnitude is irrelevant. The SNARC effect has been used to index automatic access to a central semantic and amodal magnitude representation. However, this assumption of modality independence has never been tested and it remains uncertain if the SNARC effect exists in other modalities in a similar way as in the visual modality. We have examined this question by systematically varying modality/notation (auditory number word, visual Arabic numeral, visual number word, visual dice pattern) in a within-participant design. The SNARC effect was found consistently for all modality/notation conditions, including auditory presentation. The size of the SNARC effect in the auditory condition did not differ from the SNARC effect in any visual condition. We conclude that the SNARC effect is indeed a general index of a central semantic and amodal number magnitude representation.
References
(1977). Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time. Neuropsychologia, 15, 295– 302
(1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 286– 308
(1994). Architectures for numerical cognition. Cognition, 53, 1– 44
(1992). Numerical cognition: an encoding complex perspective. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), The nature and origins of mathematical skills (pp. 457-491). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
(1995). Toward a multiroute model of number processing: Impaired number transcoding with preserved calculation skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 375– 390
(2000). Calculating without reading: Unsuspected residual abilities in pure alexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 563– 583
(1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1– 42
(1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371– 396
(1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 83– 120
(1997). Cerebral pathways for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic. Cortex, 33, 219– 250
(2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487– 506
(1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 626– 641
(2001). Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Psychological Research, 65, 250– 259
(1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 95– 110
(2005). Spatial representation of numbers. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition. NY: Psychology Press.
(2003). Cognitive representation of negative numbers. Psychological Sciences, 14, 278– 282
(2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555– 556
(2004, January). A SNARC in the dark: Input modality affects number representation. A poster presented at the 22nd European Workshop of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Bressanone, Italy.
Do negative numbers have a place on the mental number line?. Psychology Science: Special Issue Brain & Number,
in press(2004). Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. Experimental Psychology, 51, 91– 98
The hunt for SNARC. Psychology Science: Special Issue Brain & Number,
in press(2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87– B95
(1995). Obligatory activation of magnitude information during non-numerical judgments of Arabic numerals. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society, New York.
(2004). Do signers think differently? The processing of number parity in deaf participants. Cortex, 40, 176– 178
(submitted). What’s odd about 6 in German sign language. How language properties can drive number processing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 149– 157
(1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence form acquired dyscalculia. Cognition, 44, 107– 157
(1985). Cognitive mechanisms in number processing and calculation: Evidence from dyscalculia. Brain & Cognition, 4, 171– 196
(1995). Representing and using numerical information. American Psychologist, 50, 351– 363
The power of the mental number line: How the magnitude of unattended numbers affects performance in an Eriksen task. Psychology Science: Special Issue Brain & Number,
in press(2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness association of response codes) effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A, 57, 835– 863
(1986). What is crossed in crossed-hand effects?. Acta Psychologica, 62, 89– 100
(2003a). The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect. Psychological Research, 67, 43– 55
(2003b). Intrahemispherical activation, visuomotor transmission, and the Simon effect. Comment on Wascher et al. (2001) Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 152– 158
(1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174– 176
(1970). Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97– 102
(2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 731– 751
(1971). S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354– 360
(2002). Brain damage: neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature, 9, 417, 138– 139