Phasic Alertness and the Residual Task-Switching Cost
Abstract
Abstract. Participants switched between two randomly ordered discrimination tasks and each trial began with the presentation of a task cue instructing which task to execute. The authors induced phasic alertness by presenting a salient uninformative stimulus after the task cue was provided, and at variable intervals before the target stimulus was presented (Experiments 1-3) or before the task cue (Experiment 4). When the alerting stimulus preceded the target stimulus or the task cue by an optimal interval, RT was faster, indicating an alert state and the task-switching cost was reduced. These results support the suggestion of De Jong (Acta Psychologica, 1999) that alertness improves the overcoming of retrieval competition through improved goal representation, but also show that the effect is specific to the residual task-switching cost.
References
(2000). Task-switching, stimulus-response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35-70).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Advance preparation in task switching: What work is being done?. Psychological Science,
(in press)(2003). When the same response has different meaning: Recoding the response meaning in the lateral prefrontal cortex.. NeuroImage, 20, 1026– 1031
(1995). Strategical determinants of compatibility effects with task uncertainty. Acta Psychologica, 88, 187– 207
(2000). An intention-activation account of the residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 357-376).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2001). Adult age difference in goal activation and goal maintenance. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 71– 89
(1999). Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: Dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations. Acta Psychologica, 101, 379– 394
(2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 343– 353
(1996). Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goal-directed behavior. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 257– 303
(1994). Chronometric investigations of task switching. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, San Diego.
(2000). Decomposing the central executive: Persistence, deactivation, and reconfiguration of voluntary task set. In S. Monsell and J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 331-356).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1990). Age differences and similarities in the effects of cues and prompts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 523– 537
(1998). Automatic alerting does not speed late motoric processes in a reaction-time task. Nature, 391, 786– 788
(1999). Accessory stimulus effects on response selection: Does arousal speed decision making?. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 321– 329
(2001). The time course of effortful mobilization and strategic adjustments on response criteria. Psychological Research, 65, 216– 263
(2001). Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 27, 1474– 1486
(1999). Task coordination and aging: Explorations of executive control processes in the task switching paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 101, 339– 378
(2001). Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 370– 386
(2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 1124– 1140
(2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362– 372
(1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 22, 1423– 1442
(2000a). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching. Psychological Research, 63, 234– 249
(2000b). Reconfiguration of stimulus task-sets and response task-sets during task-switching. In S. Monsell and J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 377-400). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211– 253
(2004). Parkinson’s disease is associated with goal setting deficits during task switching. Brain and Cognition, 54, 260– 262
(2001). Old is associated with a pattern of relatively impaired and relatively intact task-set switching abilities. The Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 56B, P88– P102
(2002). Residual costs in task switching: Testing the failure-to-engage hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 86– 92
(1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133– 162
(1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391– 408
(1995). The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207– 231
(2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 763– 797
(1998). Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(2003). The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 92– 105
(1965). Choice reaction with variable S-R mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(3), 284– 288
(2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361– 413