Local Contextual Cuing in Visual Search
Abstract
Abstract. Previous research has indicated that covariations between the global layout of search displays and target locations result in contextual cuing: the global context guides attention to probable target locations. The present experiments extend these findings by showing that local redundancies also facilitate visual search. Participants searched for randomly located targets in invariant homogenous displays, i.e., the global context provided information neither about the location nor about the identity of the target. The only redundancy referred to spatial relations between the targets and certain distractors: Two of the distractors were frequently presented next to the targets. In four of five experiments, targets with frequent flankers were detected faster than targets with rare flankers. The data suggest that this local contextual cuing does not depend on awareness of the redundant local topography but needs the redundantly related stimuli to be attended to.
References
(1981). Processing global information in briefly presented pictures. Psychological Research, 43, 277– 292
(1972). Perceiving real-world scenes. Science, 177, 77– 80
(1989). Effect of background information on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 556– 566
(1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28– 71
(2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 2224– 2234
(1992). Automatization and training in visual search. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 271– 315
(1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316– 355
(1989). Implicit learning of new verbal associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1070– 1082
(1995). Visual object recognition. In W. Prinz & B. Bridgeman (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action. Volume 1: Perception (pp. 297-344). London: Harcourt Brace.
(1988). Kontexteffekte bei der Benennung und Entdeckung von Objekten [Context effects with the naming and detection of objects]. Sprache und Kognition, 7, 25– 39
(1999). Location-specific target expectancies in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1127– 1141
(2003). Unique transitions between stimuli and responses in SRT tasks: Evidence for the primacy of response predictions. Psychological Research, 67, 160– 173
(1983). Objektidentifikation in künstlichen Begriffshierarchien [Object identification in artificial concept hierarchies]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 191, 135– 167
(2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1105– 1124
(Ed.) (2003). Attention and implicit learning.. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
(1999). Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 236– 259
(1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289– 303
(1987). The time to identify disoriented letters: Effects of practice and font. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 303– 316
(1998). Über die Wahl von Referenzsystemen in der visuellen Suche [On the choice of reference systems in the visual search]. In U. Kotkamp & W. Krause (Eds.), Intelligente Informationsverarbeitung [Intelligent information processing] (pp. 121-130). Wiesbaden, Germany: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
(1978). Visual search of common scenes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 297– 310
(1988). Components of the location probability effect in visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 453– 471
(1996). Effects of task demands on implicit memory for object-location associations. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 104– 113
(2000). Attentional requirements for object-location priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 646– 653
(1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353– 383
(1981). The forest revisited: More on global precedence. Psychological Research, 43, 1– 32
(1980). Evidence in support of word unitization. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 390– 402
(2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9, 273– 302
(1975). The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory & Cognition, 3, 519– 526
(1997). Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 324– 354
(1985). Building permanent memory codes: codification and repetition effects in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 50– 77
(1998). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1– 53
(1994). The ontogeny of part representation in object concepts. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 31, pp. 305-354). San Diego: Academic.
(1978). A capacity allocation model for reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 586– 598
(1977). Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 211– 211
(1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233– 282
(2000). Postattentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 693– 716
(1998). Control of visual attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 223-256). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
