Skip to main content
Original Articles

Challenges in Nonlinear Structural Equation Modeling

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.3.3.100

Abstract. Challenges in evaluating nonlinear effects in multiple regression analyses include reliability, validity, multicollinearity, and dichotomization of continuous variables. While reliability and validity issues are solved by employing nonlinear structural equation modeling, multicollinearity remains a problem which may even be aggravated when using latent variable approaches. Further challenges of nonlinear latent analyses comprise the distribution of latent product terms, a problem especially relevant for approaches using maximum likelihood estimation methods based on multivariate normally distributed variables, and unbiased estimates of nonlinear effects under multicollinearity. The only methods that explicitly take the nonnormality of nonlinear latent models into account are latent moderated structural equations (LMS) and quasi-maximum likelihood (QML). In a small simulation study both methods yielded unbiased parameter estimates and correct estimates of standard errors for inferential statistics. The advantages and limitations of nonlinear structural equation modeling are discussed.

References

  • Aguinis, H. (1995). Statistical power with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management, 21, 1141– 1158 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Aiken, L.S. , West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Algina, J. , Moulder, B.C. (2001). A note on estimating the Jöreskog-Yang model for latent variable interaction using LISREL 8.3. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 40– 52 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bohrnstedt, G.W. , Goldberger, A.S. (1969). On the exact covariance of products of random variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, 1439– 1442 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K.A. (1995). Structural equation models that are nonlinear in latent variables. In P.V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1995 (Vol. 25). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bollen, K.A. (1996). An alternative two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimator for latent variable equations. Psychometrika, 61, 109– 121 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Busemeyer, J.R. , Jones, L.E. (1983). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the casual variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 549– 562 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249– 254 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cohen, J. , Cohen, P. , West, S.G. , Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Coulton, C. , Chow, J. (1992). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Journal of Social Service Research, 16(1/2), 179– 199 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cronbach, L.J. , Snow, R.E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions . New York: Irvington First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Evans, M.G. (1991). The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites: Interactions revisited. American Psychologist, 46, 6– 15 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ganzach, Y. (1997). Misleading interaction and curvilinear terms. Psychological Methods, 3, 235– 247 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Humphreys, L.G. (1978). Doing research the hard way: Substituting analysis of variance for a problem in correlational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 873– 876 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K.G. , Yang, F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In G. Marcoulides & R. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling (pp. 57-87). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kelava, A. , Moosbrugger, H. , Dimitruk, P. , Schermelleh-Engel, K. submitted The influence of multicollinearity and missing constraints of nonlinear error covariances on the performance of three estimation approaches for latent interaction and quadratic effects. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kenny, D. , Judd, C.M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201– 210 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klein, A. (2000). Moderatormodelle. Verfahren zur Analyse von Moderatoreffekten in Strukturgleichungsmodellen . [Moderator models: Method for the analysis of moderator effects in structural equation models]. Hamburg: Dr. Kovač First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Klein, A. (2006). A saturated model and evaluation of model fit for multivariate heteroscedastic models . (submitted) First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Klein, A. , Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457– 474 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klein, A. , Muthén, B.O. (2006). Quasi maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models with multiple interaction and quadratic effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research . (in press) First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lubinski, D. , Humphreys, L.G. (1990). Assessing spurious “moderator effects”: Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized (“synergistic”) relation between spatial and mathematical ability. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 385– 393 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacCallum, R.C. , Marr, C.M. (1995). Distinguishing between moderator and quadratic effects in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 405– 421 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • MacCallum, R.C. , Zhang, S. , Preacher, K.J. , Rucker, D.D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19– 40 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H.W. , Wen, Z. , Hau, K.T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275– 300 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moosbrugger, H. , Schermelleh-Engel, K. , Klein, A. (1997). Methodological problems of estimating latent interaction effects. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 2, 95– 111 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Muthén, L.K. , Muthén, B.O. (2004). Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers. User's guide (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rigdon, E.E. , Schumacker, R.E. , Wothke, W. (1998). A comparative review of interaction and nonlinear modeling. In R.E. Schumacker & G.A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 1-16). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Satorra, A. (2000). Scaled and adjusted restricted tests in multi-sample analysis of moment structures. In R.D.H. Heijmans, D.S.G. Pollock, & A. Satorra, (Eds.), Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis. A Festschrift for Heinz Neudecker (pp. 233-247). London: Kluwer First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K. , Klein, A. , Moosbrugger, H. (1998). Estimating nonlinear effects using a latent moderated structural equations approach. In R.E. Schumacker & G.A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 203-238). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schumacker, R.E. , Marcoulides, G.A. Eds. (1998). Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Steiger, J.H. , Shapiro, A. , Browne, M.W. (1985). On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential χ2 statistics . New York: Springer-Verlag First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wall, M.M. , Amemiya, Y. (2000). Estimation for polynomial structural equation models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 929– 940 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wall, M.M. , Amemiya, Y. (2001). Generalized appended product indicator procedure for nonlinear structural equation analysis. Journal of Education and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 1– 29 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • West, S.G. , Aiken, L.S. , Krull, J.L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64, 1– 48 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whisman, M.A. , McClelland, G.H. (2005). Designing, testing, and interpreting interactions and moderator effects in family research. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 111– 120 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yang-Jonsson, F. (1997). Nonlinear structural equation models. Simulation studies of the Kenny-Judd model . Stockholm: Gotab First citation in articleGoogle Scholar