Skip to main content

Grit

Distinguishing Effortful Persistence From Conscientiousness

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000175

Abstract. Maximizing the translation of ability into accomplishment is of considerable interest. A two-factor construct of “grit” as perseverance and consistency of interest has been argued to predict accomplishment over and above personality and IQ (Duckworth, Peterson, Matthews, & Kelly, 2007). Here we test this in linked analyses addressing the structure of Grit and its fit within broader personality and intelligence constructs. An initial Structural Equation Model (SEM) in 494 subjects (age 18–69 years) confirmed a two-factor structure of the Grit scales. Tests adding facet-level assessments of conscientiousness (C) and neuroticism (N) indicated that while grit consistency fit well under C, grit perseverance and related measures of control defined an “effortful persistence” construct which could not be reduced to effects of C and/or N. While conscientiousness and IQ adequately accounted for school grades, higher perseverance was associated with higher life-course accomplishment. The work supports three factors of central relevance to achievement: IQ, conscientiousness, and effortful persistence, each with distinct mechanisms.

References

  • Ashton, M. C., Jackson, D. N., Paunonen, S. V., Helmes, E. & Rothstein, M. G. (1995). The criterion validity of broad factor scales versus specific facet scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 432–442. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1995.1025 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Barron, T. F., Gusnard, D. A., Zimmerman, R. A. & Clancy, R. R. (1992). Cerebral venous thrombosis in neonates and children. Pediatric Neurology, 8, 112–116. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A. & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr057 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boker, S., Neale, M., Maes, H., Wilde, M., Spiegel, M., Brick, T., … Fox, J. (2011). OpenMx: An open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika, 76, 306–317. doi: 10.1007/s11336-010-9200-6 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Boker, S., Neale, M., Maes, H., Wilde, M., Spiegel, M., Brick, T. R., … Fox, J. (2013). OpenMx: Multipurpose software for statistical modeling (version R package version 1.3.2) Software. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia. Retrieved from http://openmx.psyc.virginia.edu First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Box, G. E. P. & Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 26, 211–246. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T. & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B. & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499–506. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.499 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Church, A. T. (1994). Relating the Tellegen and five-factor models of personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 898–909. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Corker, K. S., Oswald, F. L. & Donnellan, M. B. (2012). Conscientiousness in the classroom: A process explanation. Journal of Personality, 80, 995–1028. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00750.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and five-factor inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1998). Six approaches to the explication of facet-level traits: Examples from conscientiousness. European Journal of Personality, 12, 117–134. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Costa, P. T. Jr., McCrae, R. R. & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 887–898. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deary, I. J., Batty, D. & Gottfredson, L. S. (2005). Human hierarchies, health, and IQ. Science, 309, 703. doi: 10.1126/science.309.5735.703 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Deary, I. J., Batty, G. D., Pattie, A. & Gale, C. R. (2008). More intelligent, more dependable children live longer: A 55-year longitudinal study of a representative sample of the Scottish nation. Psychological Science, 19, 874–880. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02171.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D. & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087–1101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckworth, A. L. & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166–174. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Duckworth, A. L. & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society/APS, 16, 939–944. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Frey, M. C. & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15, 373–378. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary Genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences. London, UK: Macmillan. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gignac, G. E., Jang, K. L. & Bates, T. C. (2009). Construct redundancy within the Five-Factor Model as measured by the NEO PI-R: Implications for emotional intelligence and incremental coherence. Psychology Science Quarterly, 51, 76–86. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why “g” matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24, 79–132. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heckhausen, J. & Schulz, R. (1995). A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102, 284–304. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Heim, A. (1970). AH 4 group test of general intelligence manual. Windsor, UK: NFER Publishing Company. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Coventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • James, W. (1907). The energies of men. Science, 25, 321–332. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • John, O. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. PervinO. P. JohnEds., Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 84, pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kuncel, N. R. & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Selective citation mars conclusions about test validity and predictive bias. American Psychologist, 62, 145–146. doi: 10.1037/003-066x62.2.145 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mischel, W., Shoda, Y. & Rodriguez, M. I. (1989). Delay of gratification in children. Science, 244, 933–938. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., … Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 2693–2698. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010076108 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Noftle, E. E. & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 116–130. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • O’connor, M. C. & Paunonen, S. V. (2007). Big five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 971–990. doi: 10.1016/J.Paid.2007.03.017 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Paunonen, S. V. & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 524–539. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.524 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 2.15.X). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ritchie, S. J. & Bates, T. C. (2013). Enduring links from childhood mathematics and reading achievement to adult socioeconomic status. Psychological Science, 24, 1301–1308. doi: 10.1177/0956797612466268 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A. & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sörbom, D. (1989). Model modification. Psychometrika, 54, 371–384. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sutton, L. N., Wang, Z., Gusnard, D., Lange, B., Perilongo, G., Bogdan, A. R., … Zimmerman, R. A. (1992). Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of pediatric brain tumors. Neurosurgery, 31, 195–202. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tellegen, A. (1982). Brief manual for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire, Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tellegen, A. (2000). Manual for the multidimensional personality questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tellegen, A. & Waller, N. G. (2008). Exploring personality through test construction: Development of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. In G. J. BoyleG. MatthewsD. H. SaklofskeEds., The Sage handbook of personality theoryand assessment: Vol. II. Personality measurement and testing (pp. 261–292). London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Thompson, L. A., Detterman, D. K. & Plomin, R. (1991). Associations between cognitive abilities and scholastic achievement: Genetic overlap but environmental differences. Psychological Science, 2, 158–165. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wai, J., Lubinski, D. & Benbow, C. P. (2005). Creativity and occupational accomplishments among intellectually precocious youths: An age 13 to age 33 longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 484. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.484 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Whiteside, S. P. & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00064-7 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wrosch, C., Heckhausen, J. & Lachman, M. E. (2000). Primary and secondary control strategies for managing health and financial stress across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 15, 387–399. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Yu, C. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles, CA: University of California. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/Yudissertation.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimmerman, R. A., Bogdan, A. R. & Gusnard, D. A. (1992). Pediatric magnetic resonance angiography: Assessment of stroke. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, 15, 60–64. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar