Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

The Development of a Short Form of the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire

Published Online:May 05, 2008https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.29.2.90

Abstract

The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) has been proposed as a measure of the behavioral approach system (BAS) and behavioral inhibition system (BIS). Previous research with the SPSRQ has highlighted potential problems with the factor structure of the measure and individual item properties. The aim of the current studies was to use factor analytic and item response theory (IRT) methods to examine the psychometric properties of the SPSRQ. A further aim was to develop a short version of the SPSRQ. In Study 1, 393 adult participants completed the SPSRQ. The results from this study highlighted problems with the factor structure and item properties that had been noted in previous research. On this basis, a short form of the measure was proposed. In Study 2, the short form of the SPSRQ was tested with an independent sample (N = 327). These analyses suggested the short form of the SPSRQ had an improved factor structure, good item properties, and acceptable reliability.

References

  • Baker, F. (2001). The basics of item response theory. College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Beauducel, A., Kersting, M., Liepmann, D. (2005). A multitrait-multimethod model for the measurement of Sensitivity to Reward and Sensitivity to Punishment. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 168–175. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent-trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F.M. Lord M.R. NovickEds., Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 397–479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bolt, D.M., Hare, R.D., Vitale, J.E., Newman, J.P. (2004). A multigroup item response theory analysis of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Psychological Assessment, 16, 155–168. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Browne, M.W., Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen J.S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Carver, C.S., White, T.L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67, 319–333. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Caseras, X., Ávila, C., Torrubia, R. (2003). The measurement of individual differences in behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation systems: A comparison of personality scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 999–1013. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cogswell, A., Alloy, L.B., van Dulmen, M.H.M., Fresco, D.M. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1649–1658. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cooper, A., Gomez, R., Aucote, H. (2007). The Behavioural Inhibition System and Behavioural Approach System (BIS/BAS) Scales: Measurement and structural invariance across adults and adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 295–305. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Cooper, A.J., Perkins, A.P., Corr, P.J. (2007). A confirmatory factor analytic study of anxiety, fear, and behavioral inhibition system measures. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 179–187. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Corr, P.J. (2001). Testing problems in J.A. Gray's personality theory: A commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999). Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 333–352. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Corr, P.J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317–332. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Embretson, S.E., Reise, S.P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Eysenck, H.J., Eysenck, S.B.G. (1991). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS Adult). London: Hodder & Stoughton. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Fraley, R.C., Waller, N.G., Brennan, K.A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Gray, J.A., McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gomez, R., Cooper, A., Gomez, A. (2005). An item response theory analysis of the Carver and White (1994) BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1093–1103. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hu, L.T., Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McNaughton, N., Corr, P.J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 285–305. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthen, L.K., Muthen, B.O. (2007). MPlus 4.2. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • O'Connor, R.M., Colder, C.R., Hawk, L.W.J. (2004). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 985–1002. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pickering, A.D. (in press). Formal and computational models of reinforcement sensitivity theory. In P.J. Corr, (Ed.), The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pickering, A.D., Corr, P.J., Gray, J.A. (1999). Interactions and reinforcement sensitivity theory: A theoretical analysis of Rusting and Larsen (1997). Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 357–365. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Pickering, A.D., Corr, P.J., Powell, J.H., Kumari, V., Thornton, J.C., Gray, J.A. (1997). Individual differences in reactions to reinforcing stimuli are neither black nor white: To what extent are they gray? In H. Nyborg, (Ed.), Scientific study of human nature: Tribute to Hans J. Eysenck at eighty (pp. 36–67). Amsterdam: Pergamon/Elsevier. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Reise, S.P., Smith, L., Furr, R.M. (2001). Invariance on the NEO PI-R Neuroticism scale. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 83–110. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smillie, L.D., Jackson, C.J. (2005). The appetitive motivation scale and other BAS measures in the prediction of approach and active avoidance. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 981–994. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smillie, L.D., Pickering, A.D., Jackson, C.J. (2006). The new reinforcement sensitivity theory: Implications for personality measurement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 320–335. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Steinberg, L., Thissen, D. (1995). Item response theory in personality research. In P.E. Shrout S.T. FiskeEds., Personality research, methods, and theory: A Festschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske (pp. 161–181). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R., Lushene, R., Vagg, P.R., Jacobs, G.A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B.G., Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Torrubia, R., Ávila, C., Moltó, J., Caseras, X. (2001). The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray's anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 837–862. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Velicer, W.F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Zimowski, M.F., Muraki, E., Mislevy, R.J., Bock, D.R. (2003). BILOG-MG 3. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar