The Association Between Emotion, Social Information Processing, and Aggressive Behavior: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Abstract. Aggressive individuals are thought to process social information in such a manner that the likelihood of engaging in aggressive acts increases drastically. Additionally, emotion and emotion regulation skills are implicated in aggressive and violent behavior as well. However, little attention has been paid to the reciprocal relations between emotion and emotion regulation and Social Information Processing (SIP) in explaining aggression. Therefore, the present study systematically examined extant research on the role of emotion and SIP in aggressive behavior. The results supported substantial overlap between emotion and emotion regulation processes and SIP in explaining aggression. Due to the paucity and nature of available studies, no firm conclusion can be drawn about the nature of their reciprocal relationships. However, the integration of cognition and emotion seems a promising avenue of research for explaining the development and manifestation of aggressive behavior, as well as to inform its prevention and treatment. Future research is needed to elucidate the likely intertwined roles of emotion and the entire SIP process in offender or at-risk populations.
References Asterisks (*) indicate studies included in the systematic review.
2015). Dimorphous expressions of positive emotion: Displays of both care and aggression in response to cute stimuli. Psychological Science, 26, 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614561044
(2016). Aggression replacement training (ART) for reducing antisocial behavior in adolescents and adults: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 27, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.02.006
(2018). Classification and treatment of antisocial individuals: From behavior to biocognition. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 91, 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.010
(*2012). The role of emotion regulation in the predictive association between social information processing and aggressive behavior in adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 338–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025412444079
(*2012). Hostile attributional bias, negative emotional responding, and aggression in adults: Moderating effects of gender and impulsivity. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21407
(*2013). Developmental precursors of young school-age children’s hostile attribution bias. Developmental Psychology, 49, 2245–2256. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032293
(1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.1.74
(1990). Social information-processing bases of aggressive behavior in children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(1), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167290161002
(1992).
(Emotion, regulation, and the development of social competence . In M. S. ClarkEd., Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 119–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.2003). Towards a developmental understanding of violence. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 190–192. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.183.3.190
(2008). On-line social decision making and antisocial behavior: Some essential but neglected issues. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.09.004
(*2015). Is hostile attributional bias associated with negative urgency and impulsive behaviors? A social-cognitive conceptualization of impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.011
(2017). Negative emotionality and aggression in violent offenders: The moderating role of emotion dysregulation. Journal of Criminal Justice, 51, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.05.015
(2018). Emotion regulation and aggression: The incremental contribution of alexithymia, impulsivity, and emotion dysregulation facets. Psychology of Violence, 8, 470–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000141
(*2010). The effect of induced mood on children’s social information processing: Goal clarification and response decision. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9356-7
(*2012). Emotion regulation and aggressive behavior in preschoolers: The mediating role of social information processing. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 43, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-011-0252-3
(2017). The relationship between emotion regulation, executive functioning, and aggressive behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32, 1692–1707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515592619
(2009).
(The neurobiology of affective dyscontrol: Implications for understanding “dangerous and severe personality disorder” . In M. McMurranR. HowardEds., Personality, personality disorder and violence: An evidence based approach (pp. 157–174). Chichester, UK: Wiley.*2014). Adolescents’ aggressive and prosocial behaviors: Links with social information processing, negative emotionality, moral affect, and moral cognition. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 175, 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2014.885878
(2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Development, 71, 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00124
(*2005). The influence of provocateurs’ emotion displays on the social information processing of children varying in social adjustment and age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 344–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.12.003
(*2011). Hostile intent attributions and relational aggression: The moderating roles of emotional sensitivity, gender, and victimization. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39, 977–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9515-5
(2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
(*2005). Emotions in social information processing and their relations with reactive and proactive aggression in referred aggressive boys. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_10
(*2003). Negative feelings exacerbate hostile attributions of intent in highly aggressive boys. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP3201_06
(2002). Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: A meta‐analysis. Child Development, 73, 916–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00447
(*2012). Rage and revenge: Highly aggressive boys’ explanations for their responses to ambiguous provocation. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.680304
(2012). Emotion regulation and aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2011.09.006
(2019). Computations of Hostile Biases (CHB) model; Grounding hostility biases in a unified neuroscientific framework. Clinical Psychological Review, 73, 101775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101775
(2014). Computational approaches to psychiatry. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 25, 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2013.12.007
(2019). Hostile attribution bias and aggression in adults: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 46, 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.01.009
(2015). Model-based cognitive neuroscience approaches to computational psychiatry: Clustering and classification. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 378–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702614565359
(*2017). Adolescents’ emotional distress and attributions for face-to-face and cyber victimization: Longitudinal linkages to later aggression. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 48, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.11.002
(