Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Article

Replicability of the Psychometric Properties of Trait-Levels Measures of Spontaneous and Deliberate Mind Wandering

Published Online:June 28, 2017https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000422

Abstract

Abstract. Recent research on individual differences in mind wandering has shown that two different forms, spontaneous and deliberate, can be distinguished and measured with the Mind Wandering-Spontaneous (MW-S) and the Mind Wandering-Deliberate (MW-D) scales. In this study we tested whether the psychometric properties of Italian versions of these scales replicated across two common administration methods (paper-and-pencil and online survey). We also investigated their construct validity with respect to other self-report measures of MW and daydreaming, and measures of attentional control (AC). These measures were completed by 123 psychology students using the paper-and-pencil versions and by 165 online participants. The factor structure of the MW scales and their correlations with the other measures were replicated almost perfectly across administration methods. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) performed on data from 270 community participants further supported the replicability of the factor structure of the MW and AC scales. Albeit moderately correlated, the MW-S and the MW-D scales showed discriminant validity, since the former had significantly higher correlations with the other MW and AC measures, but not with daydreaming. These findings further supported the distinctiveness of the two forms of MW and suggested that in correlational studies the administration method is unlikely to affect results.

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2015, July 16). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. (2000). On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 25, 60–83. doi: 10.3102/10769986025001060 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buchanan, T., Ali, T., Heffernan, T. M., Ling, J., Parrott, A. C., Rodgers, J. & Scholey, A. B. (2005). Nonequivalence of on-line and paper-and-pencil psychological tests: The case of the Prospective Memory Questionnaire. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 148–154. doi: 10.3758/BF03206409 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Carriere, J. S. A., Seli, P. & Smilek, D. (2013). Wandering in both mind and body: Individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 67, 19–31. doi: 10.1037/a0031438 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Clark, L. A. & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Crump, M. J. C., McDonnell, J. V. & Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PLoS One, 8, e57410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057410 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Derryberry, D. & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 225–236. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.111.2.225 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • de Winter, J. C. F., Dodou, D. & Wieringa, P. A. (2009). Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 147–181. doi: 10.1080/00273170902794206 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Dolan, C. V., Oort, F. J., Stoel, R. D. & Wicherts, J. M. (2009). Testing measurement invariance in the target rotated multigroup exploratory factor model. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 295–314. doi: 10.1080/10705510902751416 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Finney, S. J. & DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. HancockR. O. MuellerEds., Structural Equation Modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Greenwich, CO: Information Age. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Forster, S. & Lavie, N. (2014). Distracted by your mind? Individual differences in distractibility predict mind wandering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 251–260. doi: 10.1037/a0034108 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Giambra, L. M. (1989). Task-unrelated-thought frequency as a function of age: A laboratory study. Psychology and Aging, 4, 136–143. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.4.2.136 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Giambra, L. M. (1993). The influence of aging on spontaneous shifts of attention from external stimuli to the contents of consciousness. Experimental Gerontology, 28, 485–492. doi: 10.1016/0531-5565(93)90073-M First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Giambra, L. M. (1995). A laboratory method for investigating influences on switching attention to task-unrelated imagery and thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 1–21. doi: 10.1006/ccog.1995.1001 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Green, S. B., Lissitz, R. W. & Mulaik, S. A. (1977). Limitations of coefficient alpha as an index of test unidimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 827–838. doi: 10.1177/001316447703700403 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. doi: 10.1007/BF02289447 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Jackson, J. D. & Balota, D. A. (2012). Mind-wandering in younger and older adults: Converging evidence from the sustained attention to response task and reading for comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 27, 106–119. doi: 10.1037/a0023933 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lorenzo-Seva, U. & ten Berge, J. M. F. (2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2, 57–64. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57 First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar

  • Maillet, D. & Schacter, D. L. (2016). From mind wandering to involuntary retrieval: Age-related differences in spontaneous cognitive processes. Neuropsychologia, 80, 142–156. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.017 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T. & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McVay, J. C. & Kane, M. J. (2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136, 188–197. doi: 10.1037/a0018298 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • McVay, J. C., Meier, M. E., Touron, D. R. & Kane, M. J. (2013). Aging ebbs the flow of thought: Adult age differences in mind wandering, executive control, and self-evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 142, 136–147. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.006 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mrazek, M. D., Phillips, D. T., Franklin, M. S., Broadway, J. M. & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Young and restless: Validation of the Mind-Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ) reveals disruptive impact of mind-wandering for youth. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 560. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00560 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Mrazek, M. D., Smallwood, J. & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Mindfulness and mind-wandering: Finding convergence through opposing constructs. Emotion, 12, 442–448. doi: 10.1037/a0026678 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Muthén, B. & Muthén, L. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ottaviani, C. & Couyoumdjian, A. (2013). Pros and cons of a wandering mind: a prospective study. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00524 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seli, P., Carriere, J. S. A. & Smilek, D. (2015). Not all mind wandering is created equal: Dissociating deliberate from spontaneous mind wandering. Psychological Research, 79, 750–758. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0617-x First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., Xu, M., Purdon, C. & Smilek, D. (2015). Motivation, intentionality, and mind wandering: Implications for assessments of task-unrelated thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1–9. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000116 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seli, P., Risko, E. F., Purdon, C. & Smilek, D. (2017). Intrusive thoughts: Linking spontaneous mind wandering and OCD symptomatology. Psychological Research, 81, 392–398. doi: 10.1007/s00426–016-0756–3 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Seli, P., Smallwood, J., Cheyne, J. A. & Smilek, D. (2015). On the relation of mind wandering and ADHD symptomatology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 629–636. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0793-0 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Shaw, G. A. & Giambra, L. M. (1993). Task-unrelated thoughts of college students diagnosed as hyperactive in childhood. Developmental Neuropsychology, 9, 17–30. doi: 10.1080/87565649309540541 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Singer, J. L. & Antrobus, J. S. (1970). Manual for the lmaginal Processes Inventory. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Smallwood, J. & Andrews-Hanna, J. (2013). Not all minds that wander are lost: The importance of a balanced perspective on the mind-wandering state. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 441. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00441 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Smallwood, J. & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 487–518. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Catale, C. & D’Argembeau, A. (2014). Relationships between mind-wandering and attentional control abilities in young adults and adolescents. Acta Psychologica, 148, 25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.007 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Tucker, L. R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section. Report No. 984). Washington, DC: Department of the Army. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vannucci, M., Batool, I., Pelagatti, C. & Mazzoni, G. (2014). Modifying the frequency and characteristics of involuntary autobiographical memories. PLoS ONE, 9, e89582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089582 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Velicer, W. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321–327. doi: 10.1007/BF02293557 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Westen, D. & Rosenthal, R. (2003). Quantifying construct validity: Two simple measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 608–618. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.608 First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar