Skip to main content
Original Article

Measurement Invariance of English and French Language Versions of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000365

Abstract. The alexithymia construct is commonly measured with the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), with more than 20 different language translations. Despite replication of the factor structure, however, it cannot be assumed that observed differences in mean TAS-20 scores can be interpreted similarly across different languages and cultural groups. It is necessary to also demonstrate measurement invariance (MI) for language. The aim of this study was to evaluate MI of the English and French versions of the TAS-20 using data from 17,866 Canadian military recruits; 71% spoke English and 29% spoke French as their first language. We used confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) to establish a baseline model of the TAS-20, and four increasingly restrictive multigroup CFA analyses to evaluate configural, metric, scalar, and residual error levels of MI. The best fitting factor structure in both samples was an oblique 3-factor model with an additional method factor comprised of negatively-keyed items. MI was achieved at all four levels of invariance. There were only small differences in mean scores across the two samples. Results support MI of English and French versions of the TAS-20, allowing meaningful comparisons of findings from investigations in Canadian French-speaking and English-speaking groups.

References

  • Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. doi: 10.1007/BF02294359 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Baezo-Velasco, C., Carton, S. & Almohsen, C. (2012). Alexithymia and emotional awareness in females with painful rheumatic conditions. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 73, 398–400. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.08.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bagby, R. M., Ayearst, L. E., Morariu, R. A., Watters, C. & Taylor, G. J. (2014). The internet administration version of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Psychological Assessment, 26, 16–22. doi: 10.1037/a0034316 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bagby, R. M., Parker, J. D. A. & Taylor, G. J. (1994). The Twenty-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale – I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 23–32. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J. & Parker, J. D. A. (1994). The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale-II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 33–40. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90006-X First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J., Parker, J. D. A. & Dickens, S. E. (2006). The development of the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia: Item selection, factor structure, reliability and concurrent validity. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 75, 25–39. doi: 10.1159/000089224 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bentler, P. M. (2005). ESQ 6.1 Structural equations program manual. Los Angeles, CA: Multivariate Software. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Berthoz, S., Artiges, E., Van de Moortele, P.-F., Poline, J.-B., Rouquette, S., Consoli, S. M. & Martinot, J.-L. (2002). Effect of impaired recognition and expression of emotions on frontocingulate cortices: An fMRI study of men with alexithymia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 961–967. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. BollenJ. S. LongEds., Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301834 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Chen, F. F. (2008). What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks? The impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1005–1018. doi: 10.1037/a0013193 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-to-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Culhane, S. E., Morera, O. F., Watson, P. J. & Millsap, R. E. (2009). Assessing measurement and predictive invariance of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 in U.S. Anglo and U.S. Hispanic student samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 387–395. doi: 10.1080/00223890902936264 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eid, P. & Boucher, S. (2012). Alexithymia and dyadic adjustment in intimate relationships: Analyses using the actor partner interdependence model. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31, 1095–1111. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2012.31.10.1095 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gignac, G. E., Palmer, B. R. & Stough, C. (2007). A confirmatory factor analytic investigation of the TAS-20: Corroboration of a five-factor model and suggestions for improvement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 247–257. doi: 10.1080/00223890701629730 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grabe, H. J., Löbel, S., Dittrich, D., Bagby, R. M., Taylor, G. J., Quilty, L. C., … Rufer, M. (2009). The German version of the Toronto Structured Interview for Alexithymia: Factor structure, reliability, and concurrent validity in a psychiatric patient sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 50, 424–430. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2008.11.008 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Grynberg, D., Luminet, O., Corneille, O., Grèzes, J. & Berthoz, S. (2010). Alexithymia in the interpersonal domain: A general deficit in empathy? Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 845–850. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.07.013 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. T. & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lee, J. E. C., Whitehead, J. & Dubiniecki, C. (2010). Descriptive analyses of the Recruit Health Questionnaire: 2003–2004 (DGMPRA TM 2010–010). Ottawa, Canada: Director General Military Personnel Research and Analysis, Department of National Defence. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Loas, G., Corcos, M., Stephan, P., Pellet, J., Bizouard, P., & Venisse, J. L., The Réseau INSERM no. 494013. (2001). Factorial structure of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Confirmatory factorial analyses in nonclinical and clinical samples. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 50, 255–261. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00197-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Loas, G., Otmani, O., Verrier, A., Fremaux, D. & Marchand, M. P. (1996). Factor analysis of the French version of the 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). Psychopathology, 29, 139–144. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Luminet, O., Vermeulen, N. & Grynberg, D. (2013). L’Alexithymie. Bruxelles, Belgium: De Boeck. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T. & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320–341. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Mattila, A. K., Keefer, K. V., Taylor, G. J., Joukamaa, M., Jula, A., Parker, J. D. A. & Bagby, R. M. (2010). Taxometric analysis of alexithymia in a general population sample from Finland. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.038 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C. & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 568–592. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meganck, R., Vanheule, S. & Desmet, M. (2008). Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in clinical and nonclinical samples. Assessment, 15, 36–47. doi: 10.1177/1073191107306140 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. doi: 10.1007/BF02294825 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Milfont, T. L. & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3, 112–131. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Müller, J., Bühner, M. & Ellgring, H. (2003). Is there a reliable factorial structure in the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale? A comparison of factor models in clinical and normal adult samples. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55, 561–568. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00033-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nemiah, J. C., Freyberger, H. & Sifneos, P. E. (1976). Alexithymia: A view of the psychosomatic process. In O. W. HillEd., Modern trends in psychosomatic medicine (Vol. 3, pp. 430–439). London, UK: Butterworths. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Parker, J. D. A., Taylor, G. J. & Bagby, R. M. (2003). The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale III. Reliability and factorial validity in a community population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55, 269–275. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00578-0 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von EyeC. C. CloggEds., Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • SPSS Inc (2008). SPSS Version 16.0 [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Author. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, G. J. & Bagby, R. M. (2012). The alexithymia personality dimension. In T. A. WidigerEd., The Oxford handbook of personality disorders (pp. 648–673). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, G. J. & Bagby, R. M. (2013). Alexithymia and the five-factor model of alexithymia. In T. A. WidigerP. T. CostaJr.Eds., Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 193–207). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Taylor, G. J., Bagby, R. M. & Parker, J. D. A. (2003). The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale IV. Reliability and factorial validity in different languages and cultures. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55, 277–283. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00601-3 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tsaousis, I., Taylor, G., Quilty, L., Georgiades, S., Stavrogiannopoulos, M. & Bagby, R. M. (2010). Validation of a Greek adaptation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 51, 443–448. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.09.005 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. doi: 10.1177/109442810031002 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zhu, X., Yi, J., Ryder, A. G., Taylor, G. J. & Bagby, R. M. (2007). Cross-cultural validation of a Chinese translation of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 48, 489–496. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.04.007 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar