Skip to main content
Original Article

Development and Construct Validation of the Swedish Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000076

In this study, we developed and evaluated a Swedish version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI; Zimbardo & Boyd, 1999). The original version of the ZTPI was extended by including a Future Negative scale, and the psychometric properties of both versions were examined in a sample of 419 adults aged between 18 and 80 years. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) provided support both for the original five-factor solution proposed by Zimbardo and Boyd (1999) in a Swedish sample and for a six-factor solution with the Future Negative scale as an independent factor. These findings extend the original ZTPI and suggest that negative feelings about the future constitute a central dimension of the temporal perspective. The Swedish Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (S-ZTPI) provides a reliable and valid instrument for measuring time perspective in the context of Swedish research and to be beneficial in its application in multiple areas of psychology and related disciplines.

References

  • Boyd, J. N. , Zimbardo, P. G. (2005). Time perspective, health, and risk taking. In A. Strathman, J. Joireman, (Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time (pp. 85–107). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, Publishers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Boniwell, I. , Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Time to find the right balance. The Psychologist, 16, 129–131. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Caprara, G. V. , Barbaranelli, C. , Borgogni, L. , Perugini, M. (1993). The “Big Five Questionnaire”: A new questionnaire to assess the five factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 281–288. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Epel, E. S. , Bandura, A. , Zimbardo, P. G. (1999). Escaping homelessness: The influence of self-efficacy and time perspective on coping with homelessness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 575–596. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Goldberg, J. , Maslach, C. (1996). Understanding time: Connections between the past and future. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Western Psychological Association, San Jose, CA. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hambleton, R. K. (2001). The next generation of the ITC test translation and adaptation guidelines. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 164–172. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Harber, K. D. , Zimbardo, P. G. , Boyd, J. N. (2003). Participant self-selection biases as a function of individual differences in time perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 255–264. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Holgado-Tello, F. P. , Chacón-Moscoso, S. , Barbero-García, I. , & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality and Quantity, 44, 153–166. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Keough, K. A. , Zimbardo, P. G. , Boyd, J. N. (1999). Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 149–164. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lei, M. , Lomax, R. G. (2005). The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 1–27. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in the social sciences: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Milfont, T. L. , Andrade, P. R. , Belo, R. P. , Pessoa, V. S. (2008). Testing Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory in a Brazilian sample. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 42, 49–58. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Nurmi, J.-E. (2005). Thinking about and acting upon the future. Development of future orientation across the lifespan. In A. Strathman, J. Joireman, (Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time (pp. 31–58). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Associates Publishers. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Patton, J. H. , Stanford, M. S. , Barratt, E. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768–774. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K. , Moosbrugger, H. , Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schweizer, K. (2010). Some guidelines concerning the modeling of traits and abilities in test construction. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 1–2. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Scott, S. G. , Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 818–831. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Strathman, A. , Gleicher, F. , Boninger, D. S. , Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 742–752. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Tabachnick, B. G. , Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van de Vijver, F. , Tanzer, N. K. (2004). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliqué, 54, 119–135. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Worrell, F. C. , Mello, Z. R. (2007). The reliability and validity of Zimbardo time perspective inventory scores in academically talented adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 487–504. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zalesky, Z. (1996). Future anxiety. Concept measurement and preliminary research. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 165–174. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimbardo, P. G. (2008). The time paradox: The new psychology of time that will change your life. New York: Free Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Zimbardo, P. G. , Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271–1288. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Zimbardo, P. G. , Keough, K. A. , Boyd, J. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 1007–1023. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar