Ambulatory Assessment - Monitoring Behavior in Daily Life Settings
Abstract
Abstract. Ambulatory assessment refers to the use of computer-assisted methodology for self-reports, behavior records, or physiological measurements, while the participant undergoes normal daily activities. Since the 1980s, portable microcomputer systems and physiological recorders/analyzers have been developed for this purpose. In contrast to their use in medicine, these new methods have hardly entered the domain of psychology. Questionnaire methods are still preferred, in spite of the known deficiencies of retrospective self-reports. Assessment strategies include: continuous monitoring, monitoring with time- and event-sampling methods, in-field psychological testing, field experimentation, interactive assessment, symptom monitoring, and self-management. These approaches are innovative and address ecological validity, context specificity, and are suitable for practical applications. The advantages of this methodology, as well as issues of acceptance, compliance, and reactivity are discussed. Many technical developments and research contributions have come from the German-speaking countries and the Netherlands. Nonetheless, the current Decade of Behavior (APA) calls for a more widespread use of such techniques and developments in assessment. This position paper seeks to make the case for this approach by demonstrating the advantages - and in some domains - necessities of ambulatory monitoring methodology for a behavioral science orientation in psychology.
References
1999). “Decade of Behavior” moves forward. APA MONITOR Online, 30(3), www.decadeofbehavior.org/index.cfm
(Barrett, L.F. Barrett, D.J. (2001). An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 175– 185Buse, L. Pawlik, K. (1984). Inter-Setting-Korrelationen und Setting-Persönlichkeit-Wechselwirkungen: Ergebnisse einer Felduntersuchung zur Konsistenz von Verhalten und Erleben. [Between-setting correlations and setting-personality interactions: Results of a field-study of behavioural consistency.rsqb; Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 15, 44– 59Buse, L. Pawlik, K. (1996). Ambulatory behavioral assessment and in-field psychological testing. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 29-50). Seattle, WA.: Hogrefe & HuberBussmann, H. (1998). Ambulatory monitoring of mobility-related activities in rehabilitation medicine . Delft, The Netherlands: EburonCohen, G. (1991). Memory in the real world . East Sussex: ErlbaumCohen, G. Java, R. (1995). Memory for medical history. Accuracy of recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 273– 288Csikszentmihalyi, M. Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the experience-sampling method. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526– 536Ebner-Priemer, U.W. Ed. (2006). Ambulantes psychophysiologisches Monitoring - neue Perspektiven und Anwendungen . [Ambulatory assessment - New perspectives and applications]. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang2006). Homepage at www.ambulatory-assessment.org/
(Fahrenberg, J. (2006). Assessment in daily life .. . 2000-2005 . Retrieved August 6, 2007, from www.ambulatory-assessment.org/Fahrenberg, J. Leonhart, R. Foerster, F. (2002). Alltagsnahe Psychologie mit hand-held PC und physiologischem Mess-System . [Psychology of daily life based on hand-held PC and physiological recording system]. Bern: HuberFahrenberg, J. Myrtek, M. Eds. (1996). Ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies . Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber PublishersFahrenberg, J. Myrtek, M. Eds. (2001a). Progress in ambulatory assessment: Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies . Seattle, WA: Hogrefe and Huber PublishersFahrenberg, J. Myrtek, M. (2001b). Ambulantes Monitoring und Assessment. [Ambulatory monitoring and assessment.]. In F. Rösler (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Serie Biologische Psychologie. Band 4: Grundlagen und Methoden der Psychophysiologie (pp. 657-798). Göttingen: HogrefeFahrenberg, J. Myrtek, M. (2005). Psychophysiologie in Labor, Klinik und Alltag. 40 Jahre Projektarbeit der Freiburger Forschungsgruppe Psychophysiologie - Kommentare und Neue Perspektiven . [Psychophysiology in the laboratory, clinic, and field. 40 years of research - Commentaries and new perspectives]. Frankfurt a.M.: LangFoerster, F. Fahrenberg, J. (2000). Motion pattern and posture: Correctly assessed by calibrated accelerometers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 32, 450– 457Hansen, T.W. Jeppesen, J.R. Rasmussen, S. Ibsen, H. Torp-Pedersen, C. (2006). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and risk of cardiovascular disease: A population based study. American Journal of Hypertension, 19, 243– 50Hektner, J.M. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The experience sampling method: Measuring the context and content of lives. In R.B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 233-243). New York: WileyHektner, J.M. Schmidt, J.A. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method. Measuring the quality of everyday life . Thousand Oaks, CA: SageKäppler, C. Brügner, G. Fahrenberg, J. (2001). Pocketcomputer-unterstütztes Assessment mit MONITOR: Befindlichkeit im Alltag, Methodenakzeptanz und die Replikation des Retrospektionseffektes. [Pocket-computer assisted assessment of subjective state, compliance, and replication of the negative retrospection effect] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 22, 249– 266Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science . New York: Harper and BrothersMagnusson, D. (1980). Personality in an interactional paradigm of research. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 1, 17– 34Michel, G. (in press). Daily patterns of symptom reporting in families with adolescent children. British Journal of Health Psychology,Mischel, W. (1969). Continuity and change in personality. American Psychologist, 24, 1012– 1018Myrtek, M. (2004). Heart and emotion. Ambulatory monitoring studies in everyday life . Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & HuberMyrtek, M. Brügner, G. Fichtler, A. König, K. Müller, W. Foerster (1988). Detection of emotionally induced ECG changes and their behavioral correlates: A new method for ambulatory monitoring. European Heart Journal, 9(Supplement N), 55– 60Myrtek, M. Foerster, F. Brügner, G. (2001). Freiburger Monitoring System (FMS). Ein Daten-Aufnahme- und Auswertungssystem für Untersuchungen im Alltag: Emotionale Beanspruchung, Körperlage, Bewegung, EKG, subjektives Befinden, Verhalten . [Freiburg Monitoring System (FMS). A data-acquisition system for research in daily life: Emotional strain, body position, activity, ECG, and subjective state]. Frankfurt: Peter LangPatry, J.-L. Eds. (1982). Feldforschung . [Field research]. Bern: Hans HuberPawlik, K. (1988). “Naturalistische” Daten für Psychodiagnostik: Zur Methodik psychodiagnostischer Felderhebungen. [“Naturalistic” data for psychological assessment: The methodology of in-field assessments] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 9, 169– 181Pawlik, K. Buse, L. (1982). Rechnergestützte Verhaltensregistrierung im Feld: Beschreibung und erste psychometrische Überprüfung einer neuen Erhebungsmethode. [Computer-assisted behaviour recording in the field: Description and first psychometric evaluation of a new method of study] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 3, 101– 118Pawlik, K. Buse, L. (1992). Felduntersuchungen zur transsituativen Konsistenz individueller Unterschiede im Erleben und Verhalten. [In-field studies of transsituation consistency of individual differences in experience and behavior]. In K. Pawlik & K.H. Stapf (Eds.), Umwelt und Verhalten [Environment and behavior] (pp. 25-69). Bern: HuberPawlik, K. Buse, L. (1996). Verhaltensbeobachtung in Labor und Feld. [Behavior observation in the laboratory and in the field]. In K. Pawlik (Eds.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Differentielle Psychologie und Persönlichkeitsforschung. Band 1. Grundlagen und Methoden der Differentiellen Psychologie [Encyclopedia of psychology: Differential psychology and personality research. Vol. 1: Foundations and methods of differential psychology] (pp. 359-394). Göttingen: HogrefePawlik, K. Buse, L. (2002). AMBU. Ambulatory monitoring and behavior-test unit . Göttingen: HogrefePerrez, M. (2006). Plädoyer für eine theorieadäquatere Methodik in gewissen Domänen der Psychologie. [Arguments against the mismatch of theoretical assumptions and measures in certain domains of psychology] Verhaltenstherapie & Psychosoziale Praxis, 38, 319– 330Perrez, M. Reicherts, M. (1989). Belastungsverarbeitung: Computerunterstützte Selbstbeobachtung im Feld. [Coping with stress: Computer-aided self-observation under natural conditions] Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 10, 129– 139Perrez, M. Reicherts, M. (1996). A computer-assisted self-monitoring procedure for assessing stress-related behavior under real life conditions. In J. Fahrenberg & M. Myrtek (Eds.), Ambulatory assessment. Computer-assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 51-71). Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & HuberPerrez, M. Schoebi, D. Wilhelm, P. (2000). How to assess social regulation of stress and emotions in daily family life? A computer-assisted family self-monitoring system (FASEM-C). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 7, 326– 339Perrez, M. Wilhelm, P. (2000). Control psychology under the control of questionnaires. The search for an alternative assessment procedure. In W.J. Perrig & A. Grob (Eds.), Control of human behaviour, mental processes, and consciousness (pp. 245-261). Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumPohl, R.F. Ed. (2004). Cognitive illusions. A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgment, and memory . New York: Psychology PressSmith, R.E. Leffingwell, T.R. Ptacek, J.T. (1999). Can people remember how they coped? Factors associated with discordance between same-day and retrospective reports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 1050– 1061Stone, A. Shiffman, S. Atienza, A. Nebeling, L. (2007). The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research . New York: Oxford University PressThiele, C. Laireiter, A.-R. Baumann, U. (2002). Diaries in clinical psychology and psychotherapy: A selective review. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 1– 37Todd, M. Tennnen, H. Carney, M.A. Armeli, S. (2004). Do we know how we cope? Relating daily coping reports to global and time-limited retrospective assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 310– 319Tourangeau, R. Rasinski, K.A. (1988). Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 299– 314Wilhelm, P. (2004). Empathie im Alltag von Paaren. Akkuratheit und Projektion bei der Einschätzung des Befindens des Partners . [Empathy in daily life of couples. Accuracy and projection when judging the emotional state of the partner]. Bern: HuberWilhelm, P. Perrez, M. (2001). Felddiagnostik. [Diagnostic under field conditions.]. In R.-D. Stieglitz, U. Baumann, & H.J. Freyberger, Psychodiagnostik in Klinischer Psychologie, Psychiatrie, Psychotherapie (pp. 169-182). Stuttgart: ThiemeWilhelm, P. Perrez, M. (2004). How is my partner feeling in different daily-life settings? Accuracy of spouses' judgments about their partner's feelings at work and at home. Social Indicators Research, 67, 183– 246