Skip to main content
Original Article

MOS-SF 36

Structural Equation Modeling to Test the Construct Validity of the Second-Order Factor Structure

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.1.15

The objective was to study the construct validity of the MOS SF-36 (Medical Outcome Study, short form questionnaire, version of 36 items) using structural equation modeling (SEM). Despite the widespread use of the questionnaire, several problems with the measurement model have been shown in the past, and it is highly disputable whether the computation of two component (summary) scales according to the published algorithm is a valid condensation. The SEM was conducted with the data of N = 2,874; the SF-36 was part of a questionnaire given prior to acupuncture treatment. The results indicated poor construct validity of the proposed structure of the first and second order factor solutions. First and foremost, contrary to the algorithm stated in the manual, the two component scales are not uncorrelated. Second, the overall fit of the original measurement model does not reflect the data structure very well. The current measurement model is discussed and starting points for revisions are provided.

References

  • Beals, J. , Welty, T.K. , Mitchell, C.M. , Rhoades, D.A. , Yeh, J.-L. , Henderson, J.A. (2006). Different factor loadings for SF-36: The Strong Heart Study and the National Survey of Functional Status. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 208–215. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bullinger, M. , Kirchberger, I. (1998). SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Fragebogenversion. [SF-36 Health Survey. Manual for the German version]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bullinger, M. , Kirchberger, I. , Ware, J. (1995). Der deutsche SF-36 Health Survey. [The German SF-36 Health Survey] Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften, 3, 21–36. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Gandek, B. , Sinclair, S.J. , Kosinski, M. , Ware, J. (2004). Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36 Health Survey in Medicare Managed Care. Health Care Financing Review, 25, 5–25. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gandek, B. , Ware, J.E. , Aaronson, N.K. , Alonso, J. , Apolone, G. , & Bjorner, J. (1998). Test of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in 11 countries: Result from the IQOLA project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1149–1158. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Güthlin, C. , Lange, O. , Walach, H. (2004). Measuring the effects of acupuncture and homoeopathy in general practice: An uncontrolled prospective documentation approach. BMC-Public Health, 4, 6–6. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hair, J.F. , Anderson, R.E. , Tatham, R.L. , Black, W. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hobart, J.C. , Williams, L.S. , Kimberly, M. , Thompson, A.J. (2002). Quality of life measurement after stroke. Uses and abuses of the SF-36. Stroke, 33, 1348–1356. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. , Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jöreskog, K.G. (2002, retrieved 2005). Structural equation modeling with ordinary variables using LISREL. Retrieved on 31 January 2006 from www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/corner.htm First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Keller, S.D. , Ware, J.E. , Bentler, P.M. , Aaronson, N.K. , Alonso, J. , & Apolone, G. (1998). Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 health survey in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1179–1188. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kosinski, M. , Keller, S.D. , Hatoum, H. , Xiadong, S. , Ware, J.E. (1999). The SF-36 health survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and score reliability. Medical Care, 37Suppl(5), MS10–22. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maurischat, C. , Bestmann, A. , Hasenbein, U. , Bullinger, M. (2004). Strukturelle Validität des Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) bei neurologischen Patienten. [Structural validity of the SF-36 Health Survey in patients with neurological diseases] Neurologie & Rehabilitation, 10, 13–20. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Maurischat, C. , Krüger-Bödeker, A. (2004). Analysen zum Strukturmodell des SF-36/SF-12 – eine Übersicht. [Analysis of the structural model of the SF-36/SF-12 – an overview]. In C. Maurischat, M. Morfeld, T. Kohlmann, M. Bullinger, (Eds.), Lebensqualität: Nützlichkeit und Psychometrie des Health Survey SF-36/SF-12 in der medizinischen Rehabilitation[Quality of life: Usefulness and psychometrics of the Health Survey SF-36/SF-12 within medical rehabilitation] (pp. 29– 47). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • McHorney, C.A. , Ware, J.E. , Lu, R.J.F. , Sherbourne, C.D. (1994). The MOS 36-Item-Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32, 40–66. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • McHorney, C.A. , Ware, J.E. , Raczek, A.E. (1993). The MOS 36-Item-Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31, 247–263. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Reed, P.J. (1998). Medical outcomes study short form 36: Testing and cross-validating a second-order factorial structure for health system employees. Health Services Research, 33, 1361–1380. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schermelleh-Engel, K. , Moosbrugger, H. , Müller, H. (2003). Evaluation the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Simon, G.E. , Revicki, D. , Grothaus, L. , Von Korff, M. (1998). SF-36 summary score – are physical and mental health truly distinct? Medical Care, 36, 567–572. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Taft, C. , Karlsson, J. , Sullivan, M. (2001). Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores? Quality of Life Research, 10, 395–404. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vet de, H. , Ader, H. , Terwee, C.B. , Pouwer, F. (2004). Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1203–1218. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Walach, H. , Güthlin, C. (2001). Die psychometrischen Eigenschaften des deutschen MOS-SF-36 Health Surveys. Eine Analyse anhand von Akupunkturpatienten. [Psychometric properties of the German SF 36] Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften, 9, 242–260. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wang, W.C. (2005). A comparison of alternative estimation methods in confirmatory factor analyses of the General Health Questionnaire across four groups of australian immigrants Thesis at Swinburne University of Technology, Lilydale. Retrieved 30 January 2006 from http://adt.lib.swin.edu.au/uploads/approved/adt-VSWT20051025.122616/public/01front.pdf First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ware, J.E. (2003). Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: Comments on an evolving field. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 43–51. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ware, J.E. , Gandek, B. (1998). Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 903–912. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ware, J.E. , Sherbourne, C.D. (1992). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Medical Care, 30, 473–481. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ware, J.E. , Kosinski, M. (2001a). Interpreting the SF-36 summary health measures: A response. Quality of Life Research, 10, 405–413. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Ware, J.E. , Kosinski, M. (2001b). Interpreting the SF-36 Summary Health Measures: A response. Supplemental documentation Retrieved on 20 September 2004 from www.sf-36.org/news/responsetotaft.pdf. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ware, J.E. , Kosinski, M. , Keller, S.D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A user's manual. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Center. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ware, J.E. , Snow, K.K. , Kosinski, M. , Gandek, B. (1993). SF-36 Health Survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wilson, P. (2000). The SF-36 summary scales: Problems and solutions. Sozial- und Präventivmedizin, 45, 239–246. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Wolinsky, F.D. , Stump, T.E. (1996). A measurement model of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey in a clinical sample of disadvantaged, older, black, and white men and women. Medical Care, 34, 537–548. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar