MOS-SF 36
Structural Equation Modeling to Test the Construct Validity of the Second-Order Factor Structure
Abstract
The objective was to study the construct validity of the MOS SF-36 (Medical Outcome Study, short form questionnaire, version of 36 items) using structural equation modeling (SEM). Despite the widespread use of the questionnaire, several problems with the measurement model have been shown in the past, and it is highly disputable whether the computation of two component (summary) scales according to the published algorithm is a valid condensation. The SEM was conducted with the data of N = 2,874; the SF-36 was part of a questionnaire given prior to acupuncture treatment. The results indicated poor construct validity of the proposed structure of the first and second order factor solutions. First and foremost, contrary to the algorithm stated in the manual, the two component scales are not uncorrelated. Second, the overall fit of the original measurement model does not reflect the data structure very well. The current measurement model is discussed and starting points for revisions are provided.
References
2006). Different factor loadings for SF-36: The Strong Heart Study and the National Survey of Functional Status. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59, 208–215.
(1998). SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Fragebogenversion. [
(SF-36 Health Survey. Manual for the German version ]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.1995). Der deutsche SF-36 Health Survey. [The German SF-36 Health Survey] Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften, 3, 21–36.
(2004). Psychometric evaluation of the SF-36 Health Survey in Medicare Managed Care. Health Care Financing Review, 25, 5–25.
(1998). Test of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF-36 in 11 countries: Result from the IQOLA project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1149–1158.
(2004). Measuring the effects of acupuncture and homoeopathy in general practice: An uncontrolled prospective documentation approach. BMC-Public Health, 4, 6–6.
(1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
(2002). Quality of life measurement after stroke. Uses and abuses of the SF-36. Stroke, 33, 1348–1356.
(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1–55.
(2002, retrieved 2005). Structural equation modeling with ordinary variables using LISREL. Retrieved on 31 January 2006 from www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/corner.htm
(1998). Use of structural equation modeling to test the construct validity of the SF-36 health survey in 10 countries: Results from the IQOLA project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1179–1188.
(1999). The SF-36 health survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and score reliability. Medical Care, 37Suppl(5), MS10–22.
(2004). Strukturelle Validität des Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) bei neurologischen Patienten. [Structural validity of the SF-36 Health Survey in patients with neurological diseases] Neurologie & Rehabilitation, 10, 13–20.
(2004). Analysen zum Strukturmodell des SF-36/SF-12 – eine Übersicht. [
(Analysis of the structural model of the SF-36/SF-12 – an overview ]. In , Lebensqualität: Nützlichkeit und Psychometrie des Health Survey SF-36/SF-12 in der medizinischen Rehabilitation[Quality of life: Usefulness and psychometrics of the Health Survey SF-36/SF-12 within medical rehabilitation] (pp. 29– 47). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst1994). The MOS 36-Item-Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32, 40–66.
(1993). The MOS 36-Item-Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31, 247–263.
(1998). Medical outcomes study short form 36: Testing and cross-validating a second-order factorial structure for health system employees. Health Services Research, 33, 1361–1380.
(2003). Evaluation the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23–74.
(1998). SF-36 summary score – are physical and mental health truly distinct? Medical Care, 36, 567–572.
(2001). Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores? Quality of Life Research, 10, 395–404.
(2004). Are factor analytical techniques used appropriately in the validation of health status questionnaires? A systematic review on the quality of factor analysis of the SF-36. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1203–1218.
(2001). Die psychometrischen Eigenschaften des deutschen MOS-SF-36 Health Surveys. Eine Analyse anhand von Akupunkturpatienten. [Psychometric properties of the German SF 36] Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften, 9, 242–260.
(2005). A comparison of alternative estimation methods in confirmatory factor analyses of the General Health Questionnaire across four groups of australian immigrants Thesis at Swinburne University of Technology, Lilydale. Retrieved 30 January 2006 from http://adt.lib.swin.edu.au/uploads/approved/adt-VSWT20051025.122616/public/01front.pdf
(2003). Conceptualization and measurement of health-related quality of life: Comments on an evolving field. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 43–51.
(1998). Overview of the SF-36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 903–912.
(1992). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Medical Care, 30, 473–481.
(2001a). Interpreting the SF-36 summary health measures: A response. Quality of Life Research, 10, 405–413.
(2001b). Interpreting the SF-36 Summary Health Measures: A response. Supplemental documentation Retrieved on 20 September 2004 from www.sf-36.org/news/responsetotaft.pdf.
(1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: A user's manual. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
(1993). SF-36 Health Survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
(2000). The SF-36 summary scales: Problems and solutions. Sozial- und Präventivmedizin, 45, 239–246.
(1996). A measurement model of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey in a clinical sample of disadvantaged, older, black, and white men and women. Medical Care, 34, 537–548.
(