Assessment of Bidirectional Influences Between Family Relationships and Adolescent Problem Behavior
Abstract
Abstract. In family research, bidirectional influences between the family and the individual are usually analyzed in discrete time. Results from discrete time analysis, however, have been shown to be highly dependent on the length of the observation interval. Continuous time analysis using stochastic differential equations has been proposed to circumvent this problem. The present study examined the bidirectional influences between family relationships and adolescent problem behavior by means of both discrete- and continuous-time cross-lagged panel analysis. The effect of the length of the observation interval on the results from both procedures was investigated. Data were collected from a community sample of 288 Dutch families consisting of a father, a mother, and two of their adolescent children. Whereas results from discrete time analyses differed considerably when a 2-year instead of a 1-year interval between measurements was used, results from continuous time analysis appeared to be less affected by the length of the observation interval. Continuous time analysis revealed family relationship characteristics and levels of adolescent problem behavior to be highly stable over time. Relatively small cross-lagged effects were found between family relationships and adolescent problem behaviors.
References
Arminger, G. Wittenberg, J. Schepers, A. (1996). MECOSA 3: Mean and covariance structure analysis . Friedrichsdorf, Germany: AdditiveBell, R.Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychological Review, 75, 81– 95Bergstrom, A.R. (1966). Nonrecursive models as discrete approximations to systems of stochastic differential equations. Econometrica, 34, 173– 182Bergstrom, A.R. (1984). Continuous time stochastic models and issues of aggregation over time. In Z. Griliches & M.D. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (Vol. 2, pp. 1145- 1212). Amsterdam: North-HollandBoszormenyi-Nagy, I. Spark, G. (1984). Invisible loyalties: Reciprocity in intergenerational family therapy . New York: Brunner/MazelCampbell, D.T. Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs in research . Chicago: Rand McNallyCook, W.L. (1994). A structural equation model of dyadic relationships within the family system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 500– 509De Bruyn, E.E.J. Vermulst, A.A. Houtmans, M.J.M. De Meyer, R.E. (1997). The Nijmegen problem behavior list, Research version . Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen, The NetherlandsDelsing, M.J.M.H. Oud, J.H.L. De Bruyn, E.E.J. van Aken, M.A.G. (2003). Current and recollected perceptions of family relationships: The social relations model approach applied to members of three generations. Journal of Family Psychology, 17, 445– 459Gollob, H.F. Reichardt, C.S. (1987). Taking account of time lags in causal models. Child Development, 58, 80– 92Jöreskog, K. Sörbom, D. (1994). LISREL VIII: User's guide (5th Edition). Mooresville, IN: Scientific SoftwareKashy, D.A. Kenny, D.A. (1990). Analysis of family research designs. A model of interdependence. Communication Research, 17, 462– 482Kenny, D.A. La Voie, L. (1984). The social relations model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 141-182). Orlando, FL: Academic PressLazarsfeld, P.F. (1940). “Panel” studies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 4, 122– 128Lazarsfeld, P.F. Fiske, M. (1938). The panel as a new tool for measuring opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 2, 596– 612Lorenz, F.O. Conger, R.D. Simons, R.L. Whitbeck, L.B. (1995). The effects of unequal variances and covariances in simultaneous inference: The case of hostility and marital quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 574, 1049– 1064Lytton, H. (1990). Child and parental effects in boys' conduct disorder: A reinterpretation. Developmental Psychology, 26, 683– 697Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: Provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development, 56, 289– 302Neale, M.C. Boker, S.M. Xie, G. Maes, H.H. (1999). Mx: Statistical modeling (4th ed). Richmond, VA: Department of PsychiatryOud, J.H.L. (2002). Continuous time modeling of the cross-lagged panel design. Kwantitatieve Methoden, 69, 1– 26Oud, J.H.L. Welzen, K.F. (1989). De Nijmeegse Gezinsrelatie Test: Kinderversie . [The Nijmegen Family Relations Test: Child version]. Lisse: Swets & ZeitlingerSher, K.J. Wood, M.D. Wood, P.K. Raskin, G. (1996). Alcohol outcome expectancies and alcohol use: A latent variable cross-lagged panel study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 105, 561– 574Vuchinich, S. Bank, L. Patterson, G.R. (1992). Parenting, peers, and the stability of antisocial behaviors in preadolescent boys. Developmental Psychology, 28, 510– 521Wittenberg Fisher, S. (1996). The family and the individual: Reciprocal influences. In S. Duck & N. Vanzetti (Eds.), A lifetime of relationships (pp. 311-335). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/ Cole
