Abstract
Abstract. This study reexamined the factor structure of the Emotional Autonomy Scale (EAS; Steinberg & Silverberg, 1986) by means of confirmatory factor analysis on a large adolescent sample (N = 5065) from the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium. By looking for homogeneous subsets of items within the EAS, the meaning of the measure was clarified. None of the factor structures of the EAS suggested in the literature was supported, because of lack of fit and/or lack of construct validity. Instead, a model with seven first-order factors (Deidealization, Nondependency, Nonimitation, Privacy, Perceived ignorance, Distrust, and Perceived alienation) and two second-order factors (Separation and Detachment) was retained that proved invariant and equal across gender and grade. These findings call for continuing work on the conceptual foundations of the EAS and have important implications for the ongoing debate on the developmental outcomes of emotional autonomy (the detachment debate).
References
Beyers, W. Goossens, L. (1999). Emotional autonomy, psychosocial adjustment, and parenting: Interactions, moderating, and mediating effects. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 753– 769Beyers, W. Goossens, L. (2003). Psychological separation and adjustment to university: Moderating effects of gender, age, and perceived parenting style. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 363– 382Beyers, W. Goossens, L. Vansant, I. Moors, E. (2003). A structural model of autonomy in middle and late adolescence: Connectedness, separation, detachment, and agency. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 351– 365Blos, P. (1979). The adolescent passage . Madison, CT: International Universities PressBollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables . New York: WileyBray, J.H. Adams, G.J. Getz, J.G. Baer, P.E. (2001). Developmental, family, and ethnic influences on adolescent alcohol use: A growth curve approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 301– 314Chen, Z. Dornbusch, S.M. (1998). Relating aspects of adolescent emotional autonomy to academic achievement and deviant behavior. Journal of Adolescent Research, 13, 293– 319Du Toit, M. Du Toit, S. (2001). Interactive LISREL: User's guide . Chicago: Scientific Software InternationalFinkenauer, C. Engels, R.C.M.E. Meeus, W. (2002). Keeping secrets from parents: Advantages and disadvantages of secrecy in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31, 123– 136Frank, S.J. Pirsch, L.A. Wright, V.C. (1990). Late adolescents' perceptions of their relationships with their parents: Relationships among deidealization, autonomy, relatedness, and insecurity and implications for adolescent adjustment and ego identity status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 571– 588Garber, J. Little, S.A. (2001). Emotional autonomy and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 355– 371Hu, L. Bentler, P.M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424– 453Hu, L. Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1– 55Jöreskog, K.G. Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language . Chicago: Scientific Software InternationalLamborn, S.D. Steinberg, L. (1993). Emotional autonomy redux: Revisiting Ryan and Lynch. Child Development, 64, 483– 499Levy-Warren, M.H. (1999). I am, you are, and so are we: A current perspective on adolescent separation-individuation theory. In A.H. Esman, L.T. Flaherty, & H.A. Horowitz (Eds.), Adolescent psychiatry: Developmental and clinical studies (Vol. 24, pp. 3-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic PressLoehlin, J.C. (1998). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumPapini, D.R. Roggman, L.A. (1992). Adolescent perceived attachment to parents in relation to competence, depression, and anxiety: A longitudinal study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 12, 420– 440Ryan, R.M. Lynch, J.H. (1989). Emotional autonomy versus detachment: Revisiting the vicissitudes of adolescence and young adulthood. Child Development, 60, 340– 356Satorra, A. Bentler, P.M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C.C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis: Applications in developmental research (pp. 399-419). Newbury Park, CA: SageSatorra, A. Bentler, P.M. (2001). A scaled difference χ2 test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507– 514Schmitz, M.F. Baer, J.C. (2001). The vicissitudes of measurement: A confirmatory factor analysis of the Emotional Autonomy Scale. Child Development, 72, 207– 219Silverberg, S.B. Gondoli, D.M. (1996). Autonomy in adolescence: A contextualized perspective. In G.R. Adams, R. Montemayor, & T.P. Gullotta (Eds.), Psychosocial development during adolescence (pp. 12-61). Thousand Oaks, CA: SageSörbom, D. (1989). Model modification. Psychometrika, 54, 371– 384Smollar, J. Youniss, J. (1989). Transformations in adolescents' perceptions of parents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 71– 84Steinberg, L. Silverberg, S.B. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Development, 57, 841– 851Turner, R.A. Irwin, C.E. Tschann, J.M. Millstein, S.G. (1993). Autonomy, relatedness, and the initiation of health risk behaviors in early adolescence. Health Psychology, 12, 200– 208Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J. Collins, W.A. (2003). Autonomy development during adolescence. In G.R. Adams & M. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 175-204). Oxford: Blackwell
