Construction and Validation of the Death Anxiety Inventory (DAI)
Abstract
Abstract.Background. Over the last 40 years the study of human attitudes toward death has attracted much scientific interest and a significant amount of research has been carried out in the English-speaking world. However, among Spanish-speaking researchers the subject has been practically ignored, as has the issue of related psychometric instruments. The aim of this study was to develop the Death Anxiety Inventory (DAI) and thus provide a valid and reliable assessment instrument for measuring death anxiety among Spanish-speaking subjects. Methods: This study examined the psychometric properties of the DAI. The DAI is a self-administered questionnaire of 20 items that can be used in either a dichotomous true/false format or on a six-point Likert scale. The properties of both scales were investigated by means of six empirical studies and several samples. Results: The scale has an α coefficient of internal consistency of 0.90 and test-retest correlation, at 4 weeks, of 0.94. The correlation with Templer's Death Anxiety Scale was 0.79. Factor analysis of the DAI identified five significant factors. Taken together these factors explained 54.60% of the total variance and were labeled as: (1) Externally generated death anxiety, (2) Meaning and acceptance of death, (3) Thoughts about death, (4) Life after death, and (5) Brevity of life. The English form of the DAI is also presented in the study in order to enable cross-cultural comparisons to be made. Conclusion: Results of this study suggest that the DAI has adequate psychometric properties that make it a valid and reliable instrument to assess death anxiety in Spanish-speaking individuals.
References
Abdel-Khalek, A.M. Beshai, J.A. Templer, D.I. (1993). The structure of Templer's Death Anxiety Scale among Egyptian students. Psychological Reports, 72, 920– 922Collett, L. Lester, D. (1969). The fear of death and the fear of dying. Journal of Psychology, 72, 179– 181Devins, G.M. (1979). Death anxiety and voluntary passive euthanasia: Influences of proximity to death and experiences with death in important other persons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 301– 309Gilliland, J.C. Templer, D.I. (1985-1986). Relationship of death anxiety scale factors to the subjective state. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 16, 155– 167Hoogstraten, J. Koele, P. Van der Laan, J. (1998). Templer's Death Anxiety Scale revisited: The Dutch version. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 1259– 1264Lester, D. Templer, D.I. (1992-1993). Death anxiety scales: A dialogue. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 26, 239– 253Lonetto, R. Fleming, S. Mercer, G.W. (1979). The structure of death anxiety: A factor analytic study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 388– 392Lonetto, R. Templer, D.I. (1986). Death anxiety . Washington: Hemisphere PublishingMartin, T.O. (1982-1983). Death anxiety and social desirability among nurses. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 13, 51– 58Stillon, J.M. (1985). Death and the sexes . Washington: Hemisphere PublishingSwaminathan, H. Rogers, H.J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 361– 370Taylor, J.A. (1953). A personality scale of manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 285– 290Templer, D.I. (1970). The construction and validation of a Death Anxiety Scale. Journal of General Psychology, 82, 165– 177Templer, D.I. (1976). Two factor theory of death anxiety: A note. Essence, 1, 91– 93Thorson, J.A. Powell, F.C. (1984, October). Revision and factor analysis of a death anxiety scale . Paper presented at the 37th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society, San Antonio, TXTomás-Sábado, J. Gómez-Benito, J. (2002). Psychometric properties of the Spanish form of Templer's Death Anxiety Scale. Psychological Reports, 91, 1116– 1120Wong, P.T. Reker, G.T. Gesser, G. (1994). Death attitude profile-revised. In R.A. Neimeyer (Ed.), Death anxiety handbook: Research, instrumentation, and application (pp.121-148). Washington: Taylor & Francis