Abstract
Abstract. Threat-related attention bias is thought to contribute to the development and maintenance of anxiety disorders. Dot-probe studies using event-related potentials (ERPs) have indicated that several early ERP components are modulated by threatening and emotional stimuli in anxious populations, suggesting enhanced allocation of attention to threat and emotion at earlier stages of processing. However, ERP components selected for examination and analysis in these studies vary widely and remain inconsistent. The present study used temporospatial principal component analysis (PCA) to systematically identify ERP components elicited to face pair cues and probes in a dot-probe task in anxious adults. Cue-locked components sensitive to emotion included an early occipital C1 component enhanced for happy versus angry face pair cues and an early parieto-occipital P1 component enhanced for happy versus angry face pair cues. Probe-locked components sensitive to congruency included a parieto-occipital P2 component enhanced for incongruent probes (probes replacing neutral faces) versus congruent probes (probes replacing emotional faces). Split-half correlations indicated that the mean value around the PCA-derived peaks was reliably measured in the ERP waveforms. These results highlight promising neurophysiological markers for attentional bias research that can be extended to designs comparing anxious and healthy comparison groups. Results from a secondary exploratory PCA analysis investigating the effects of emotional face position and analyses on behavioral reaction time data are also presented.
References
. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). APA.
(2003). Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: Facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(11), 1325–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00039-1
(2005). Attentional bias in anxiety: A behavioral and ERP study. Brain and Cognition, 59(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2005.03.005
(2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1
(1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
(1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551
(1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
(2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.003
(1996). Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(5), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.5.387
(2016). Something to sink your teeth into: The presence of teeth augments ERPs to mouth expressions. NeuroImage, 127, 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.12.020
(2010a). Evaluating two‐step PCA of ERP data with geomin, infomax, oblimin, promax, and varimax rotations. Psychophysiology, 47(1), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00885.x
(2010b). The ERP PCA Toolkit: An open source program for advanced statistical analysis of event-related potential data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 187(1), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JNEUMETH.2009.12.009
(2012). Applying principal components analysis to event-related potentials: A tutorial. Developmental Neuropsychology, 37(6), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2012.697503
(2017). Best practices for repeated measures ANOVAs of ERP data: Reference, regional channels, and robust ANOVAs. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 111, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.006
(2005). Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: Matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116(8), 1808–1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2004.11.025
(2005).
Introduction to principal components analysis of event-related potentials . In T. HandyEd., Event-related potentials: A methods handbook (pp. 189–208). MIT Press. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joseph_Dien/publication/228449904_Introduction_to_Principal_Components_Analysis_of_Event-Related_Potentials/links/00b7d52aa6c7b5b3e8000000.pdf(1976). Pictures of facial affect, Consulting Psychologists Press.
(2010). Enhanced neural reactivity and selective attention to threat in anxiety. Biological Psychology, 85(2), 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.07.010
(2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
(2008). Trait anxiety modulates the electrophysiological indices of rapid spatial orienting towards angry faces. Neuroreport, 19(3), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282f53d2a
(1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55(4), 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9
(2019). The neural chronometry of threat-related attentional bias: Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for early and late stages of selective attentional processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 146, 20–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.08.006
(2009). Motivated and controlled attention to emotion: Time-course of the late positive potential. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(3), 505–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CLINPH.2008.11.028
(2001). Combined expectancies: Event-related potentials reveal the early benefits of spatial attention that are obscured by reaction time measures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.303
(2008). Affective primes suppress attention bias to threat in socially anxious individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(7), 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.03.011
(2009). Attentional selectivity for emotional faces: Evidence from human electrophysiology. Psychophysiology, 46(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00750.x
(2004). Face to face: Visual scanpath evidence for abnormal processing of facial expressions in social phobia. Psychiatry Research, 127(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2004.02.016
(1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
(1995). Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 2(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)90008-X
(2014). Behavioral and ERP measures of attentional bias to threat in the dot-probe task: Poor reliability and lack of correlation with anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01368
(2015). Electrocortical evidence for rapid allocation of attention to threat in the dot-probe task. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(4), 577–583. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu098
(2003). Optimizing PCA methodology for ERP component identification and measurement: Theoretical rationale and empirical evaluation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114(12), 2307–2325. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245703002414
(2003). A generally robust approach to hypothesis testing in independent and correlated groups designs. Psychophysiology, 40(4), 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00060
(2013). Differentiating event-related potential components sensitive to emotion in middle childhood: Evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. Developmental Psychobiology, 55(5), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21058
(2020). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=emmeans
(2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique (2nd ed.). MIT Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=y4-uAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=an+introduction+to+the+event+related+potential+technique+second+edition&ots=jBX_G0RQDH&sig=n9SK7x9crVI1hW9Gtyl7xyz9NN0
(2000). Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01545-X
(1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.95.1.15
(2008). Identification of angry faces in the attentional blink. Cognition & Emotion, 22(7), 1340–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701774218
(1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(9), 809–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(98)00063-1
(2016). Anxiety and attention to threat: Cognitive mechanisms and treatment with attention bias modification. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 87, 76–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BRAT.2016.08.001
(2018). Anxiety and threat-related attention: Cognitive-motivational framework and treatment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TICS.2018.01.001
(1997). Time course of attentional bias for threat information in non-clinical anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35(4), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00109-x
(1993). Subliminal processing of emotional information in anxiety and depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(2), 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.102.2.304
(1987). Memory bias in clinical anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.96.2.94
(2009). Electrophysiological evidence of attentional biases in social anxiety disorder. Psychological Medicine, 39(7), 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291708004820
(2020). Developmental trajectory of the late positive potential: Using temporal‐spatial PCA to characterize within‐subject developmental changes in emotional processing. Psychophysiology, 57(2), Article e13478. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13478
(1983). Allocation of attention according to informativeness in visual recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 35(3), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748308402484
(2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/AXJ96-3445.130.3.466
(2018). The role of attention bias to threat in anxiety: Mechanisms, modulators and open questions. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COBEHA.2017.09.008
(2019). Stability and change in emotional processing across development: A 6‐year longitudinal investigation using event‐related potentials. Psychophysiology, 56(11), Article e13438. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13438
(2017). Temperament differentially influences early information processing in men and women: Preliminary electrophysiological evidence of attentional biases in healthy individuals. Biological Psychology, 122, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.07.007
(2004). Electrophysiological correlates of rapid spatial orienting towards fearful faces. Cerebral Cortex, 14(6), 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh023
. (2019). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. https://cran.r-project.org/
(2017). The N2pc component reliably captures attentional bias in social anxiety. Psychophysiology, 54(4), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12809
(2013). Fear of negative evaluation and attentional bias for facial expressions: An event-related study. Brain and Cognition, 82(3), 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.05.008
(2018). afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=afex
(1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Consulting Psychologists Press.
. (2020). jamovi. [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org
(2018). Event-related potentials of attentional bias toward faces in the dot-probe task: A systematic review. Psychophysiology, 55(6), Article e13051. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13051
(2014). A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety. Psychological Bulletin, 140(3), 1–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034834
(2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cognition & Emotion, 24(1), 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903205698
