Abstract
The question of whether the mismatch negativity (MMN) is modulated by attention has been debated for over a decade. Although the MMN is widely regarded as reflecting a preattentive auditory process, many studies have shown attention effects on MMN. So, what does preattentive mean if attention can modulate the MMN? To understand the function of MMN in auditory processing, we need to shed new light on the “MMN and attention” debate. This review will discuss the apparent paradox that MMN can be modulated by attention and still be considered an attention-independent process, and provide a new framework for viewing the MMN system. The new model proposes that the principal factor governing MMN is the sound context. MMN generation relies on multiple processing mechanisms that are part of a larger system of auditory scene analysis.
References
(1997). Attention modulates auditory pattern memory as indexed by event-related potentials. Psychophysiology, 34, 534–546.
(2002). Stepping out of the spotlight: MMN attenuation as a function of distance from the attended location. Neuroreport, 13, 2209–2212.
(2003). Effects of temporal encoding on auditory object formation: A mismatch negativity study. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 359–371.
(1990). Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(1999). Mismatch negativity to acoustic differences not differentiated behaviorally. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10, 388–399.
(2007). The frontal generator of the mismatch negativity revisited. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 188–203.
(2000). Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 5, 151–166.
(2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355–373.
(2000). Mismatch negativity in children and adults, and effects of an attended task. Psychophysiology, 37, 807–816.
(2005). Preattentive and attentive processing of temporal and frequency characteristics within long sounds. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 711–721.
(1998). Impaired mismatch negativity (MMN) generation in schizophrenia as a function of stimulus deviance, probability, and interstimulus/interdeviant interval. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 108(2), 143–153.
(1996). Role of cortical N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in auditory sensory memory and mismatch negativity generation: Implications for schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 93, 11962–11967.
(1994). Detection of stimulus deviance within primate primary auditory cortex: Intracortical mechanisms of mismatch negativity (MMN) generation. Brain Research, 667, 192–200.
(1998). Anatomic bases of event-related potentials and their relationship to novelty detection in humans. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, 15, 3–13.
(1996). Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems. Science, 273, 971–973.
(2001). The mismatch negativity in evaluating central auditory dysfunction in dyslexia. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 535–543.
(2006). The independence of memory traces of attended and unattended stimuli. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1566–1570.
(2006). Temporal grouping affects the automatic processing of deviant sounds. Biological Psychology,
in press .(2005). Auditory streaming affects the processing of successive deviant and standard sounds. Psychophysiology, 42, 668–676.
(2005). “... and were instructed to read a self-selected book while ignoring the auditory stimuli”: The effects of task demands on the mismatch negativity. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, 2142–2152.
(2006). The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the mismatch negativity. Brain Research, 1078, 112–130.
(1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
(2003). Mismatch negativity: Clinical research and possible applications. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 48, 179–188.
(1978). Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313–329.
(1993). Attention and mismatch negativity. Psychophysiology, 30, 436–450.
(1982). Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials. Biological Psychology, 14, 53–98.
(2003). Preattentive evaluation of multiple perceptual streams in human audition. Neuroreport, 14, 871–4.
(1992). The chronometry of attention-modulated processing and automatic mismatch detection. Psychophysiology, 29, 412–430.
(1993). Mismatch negativity to slight pitch changes outside strong attentional focus. Biological Psychology, 37, 23–41.
(2000). Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 5, 111–139.
(2001). MMN is unaffected by top-down predictive information. NeuroReport, 12, 2209–2213.
(1995). The mismatch negativity of event-related potentials as a probe of transient auditory memory: A review. Ear and Hearing, 16, 52–67.
(2000). Evidence that the mismatch negativity system works on the basis of objects. NeuroReport, 11, 61–63.
(1999). Two cognitive systems simultaneously prepared for opposite events. Psychophysiology, 36, 835–838.
(1989). A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 336–355.
(2007). Direct evidence for differential roles of temporal and frontal components of auditory change detection. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1878–1888.
(2005). Integration and segregation in auditory scene analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 1285–1298.
(2005). Attentional modulation of electrophysiological activity in auditory cortex for unattended sounds in multistream auditory environments. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(1), 93–110.
(2001). Auditory stream segregation processes operate similarly in school-aged children as adults. Hearing Research, 153, 108–114.
(2005). Organization of sequential sounds in auditory memory. NeuroReport, 16, 1519–1523.
(2007). The role of attention in the formation of auditory streams. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 136–152.
(2004). Automatic and controlled processing of acoustic and phonetic contrasts. Hearing Research, 190, 128–140.
(1998a). Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system. Brain Research, 789, 130–138.
(1998b). Stimulus predictability and the mismatch negativity system. NeuroReport, 9, 4167–4170.
(1999). An investigation of the auditory streaming effect using event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 36, 22–34.
(2006). Neurophysiological evidence for context-dependent encoding of sensory input in human auditory cortex. Brain Research, 1075(1), 165–174.
(2001). Dynamic sensory updating in the auditory system. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 431–439.
(2002). Top-down effects on the initially stimulus-driven auditory organization. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 393–405.
(2003a). Representation of the standard: Stimulus context effects on the process generating the mismatch negativity component of event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 40, 465–471.
(2003b). Top-down control over involuntary attention-switching in the auditory modality. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10, 630–637.
(2003c). MMN and attention: Competition for deviance detection. Psychophysiology, 40, 430–435.
(1999). Phonemes, intensity, and attention: Differential effects on the mismatch negativity (MMN). Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 106, 3492–3505.
(1995). Attentional modulation of the mismatch negativity elicited by frequency differences between binaurally presented tone bursts. Psychophysiology, 32, 319–328.
(2004). Multiple time scales of adaptation in auditory cortex neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 10440–10453.
(2003). Processing of low-probability sounds by cortical neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 391–398.
(2005). Auditory organization of sound sequences by a temporal or numerical regularity – A mismatch study comparing musicians and nonmusicians. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 270–76.
(2003). Human auditory cortex tracks task-irrelevant sound sources in auditory cortex. NeuroReport, 14, 2053–2056.
(2002). Temporary and longer-term retention of acoustic information. Psychophysiology, 39, 530–534.
(2003). Preattentive auditory context effects. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 3(1), 57–77.
(2006). Object representation in the human auditory system. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 625–634.
(1991). The effects of channel-selective attention on the mismatch negativity wave elicited by deviant tones. Psychophysiology, 28, 30–42.
(1998). Magnetoencephalographic recordings demonstrate attentional modulation of mismatch-related neural activity in human auditory cortex. Psychophysiology, 35, 283–292.
(1990). The physiological basis of selective attention: Implications of event-related potential studies. In , Event-related potentials: Basic issues and applications (pp. 178–209). New York: Oxford University Press.
(2001). Organizing sound sequences in the human brain: The interplay of auditory streaming and temporal integration. Cognitive Brain Research, 897(1–2), 222–227.
(2005). Graded visual attention modulates brain responses evoked by task-irrelevant auditory pitch changes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1819–28.
