Dynamic Assessment of Cognitive Rehabilitation Potential in Schizophrenic Persons and in Elderly Persons With and Without Dementia
Abstract
Summary: Dynamic assessment is a diagnostic approach in which specific interventions are integrated into assessment procedures to estimate cognitive modifiability. The study investigates the utility of this approach in persons with compelling rehabilitational needs. Samples of schizophrenic patients and of elderly with and without dementia were assessed with dynamic versions of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the Auditory Verbal Learning Test. Both tests were administered by applying specific procedures of verbal mediation designed to increase performance. Results demonstrated superior predictive validity with regard to proficiency in a clinical training in schizophrenic subjects and better discrimination of nondemented and demented elderly with the help of dynamic measures compared to static test scores. Subsequent correlational analyses indicated that, for both tests, performance change following intervention is related to the processing of verbal context information. Results are discussed with respect to the concept of verbal working memory as one component of the patients' rehabilitation potential.
References
References
Baltes, M. Kühl, K. Sowarka, D. (1992). Testing the limits of cognitive reserve capacity: A promising strategy for early diagnosis of dementia?. Journal of Gerontology, 47, 165– 167Baltes, M. Kühl, K.P. Gutzmann, H. Sowarka, D. (1995). Potential of cognitive plasticity as a diagnostic instrument: A cross-validation and extension. Psychology and Aging, 10, 167– 172Baltes, P.B. (1993). The aging mind: Potentials and limits. The Gerontologist, 33, 580– 594Baltes, M. Raykov, T. (1996). Prospective validity of cognitive plasticity in the diagnosis of mental status: A structural equation model. Neuropsychology, 10, 549– 556Budoff, M. (1987). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment (pp. 173-195). New York: GuilfordCalero, M.-D. Lonzano, M. A. (1994). La evaluación del potencial de aprendizaje en ancianos [Learning potential assessment in elderly]. Revista de Psicología General y aplicada, 44, 89– 100Calero, M.D. Navarro, E. Arnedo, M.L. García-Berben, T.M. Robles, P. (2000). Estimación del potencial de rehabilitación en ancianos con y sin deterioro cognitivo asociado a demencias [Estimating the rehabilitation potential in the elderly with cognitive deterioration by dementia]. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 35 (in press)Carlson, J. Wiedl, K.H. (2000). The validity of dynamic assessment. In C. Lidz & J. Elliot (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 681-710). Greenwich: JAI PressCicerone, K.D. Tupper, D.E. (1986). Cognitive assessment in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of head injured adults. In B. Uzzel & J. Gross (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology of intervention (pp. 59-83). Boston: NijhoffCorrigan, P.W. Wallace, C.J. Schade, M.L. Green, M.F. (1994). Learning medication self-management skills in schizophrenia. Relationships with cognitive deficits and psychiatric symptom. Behavior Therapy, 25, 5– 15Fernández-Ballesteros, R. Calero, M.D. Campllonch, J.M. Belchí, J. (1990). EPA: evaluación del Potencial de Aprendizaje [LPA: Learning potential assessment]. Madrid, MEPSAFernández-Ballesteros, R. Calero, M.D. (1993). Measuring learning potential. International Journal of Cognitive Education and Mediated Learning, 3, 1 9– 20Fernández-Ballesteros, R. Calero, M.D. (1995). Training effect on intelligence of older persons. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 20, 135– 148Fernández-Ballesteros, R. Calero, M.D. (2000). The assessment of learning potential: The EPA instrument. In C.S. Lidz & J. Elliot (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 293-323). Greenwich: JAI PressFernández-Ballesteros, R. Juan Espinosa, M. Colom, R. Calero, M.D. (1997). Contextual and personal sources of individual differences in intelligence: Empirical results. In J. Kingma & W. Tomic (Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice (Vol. 4, pp. 221-274). London: JAI PressFeuerstein, R. Rand, Y. Hoffmann, M.B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of related performance: The learning assessment potential device, theory, instruments and techniques . Baltimore: University Park PressFolstein, M.F. Fostein, S.E. McHugh, P.R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal Psychiatric Research, 12, 189– 198Goldberg, T.E. Weinberger, D.R. Berman, K.F. Pliskin, N.H. Podd, M.H. (1987). Further evidence for dementia of prefrontal type in schizophrenia? A controlled study of teaching the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 1008– 1014Green, M.F. (1993). Cognitive remediation in schizophrenia. Is it time yet?. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 178– 187Green, M.F. Satz, P. Ganzell, S. Vaclav, J.F. (1992). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance in schizophrenia: Remediation of a stubborn deficit. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 62– 67Green, M.F. Hellman, S. Kern, R.S. (1997). Feasibility studies of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: Grasping the little picture. In H.D. Brenner, W. Böker, & R. Genner (Eds.), Towards a comprehensive therapy for schizophrenia (pp. 79-93). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber PublishersGuthke, J. Adler, L. (1990). Empirische Untersuchungsergebnisse zum Dynamischen Testen bei der Psychodiagnostik von Hirnorganikern. Zeitschrift für Gerontopsychologie und -psychiatrie, 3, 1– 12Guthke, J. Wiedl, K.H. (1996). Dynamisches Testen. Zur Psychodiagnostik der intraindividuellen Variabilität [Dynamic testing: Toward the psychodiagnosis of intraindividual differences]. Göttingen: HogrefeHeaton, R.K. (1981). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual . Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment ResourcesHeaton, R.K. Paulsen, J.S. McAdams, L.A. Kuck, J. Zisook, S. (1994). Neuropsychological deficits in schizophrenics. Relationships to age, chronicity and dementia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 469– 475Hedges, L. Olkin, J. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis . New York: Oxford University PressKruse, A. (1992). Das Rehabilitationspotential älterer Menschen [The rehabilitation potential of the elderly]. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie, 25, 231– 237Lezak, M.D. (1983). Neuropsychological assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University PressRey, A. (1934). D'une procédé pour évaluer l'éducabilité: Quelques applications en psychopathologie [An educability assessment device: Some applications in psychopathology]. Archives de Psychologie, 24, 96 298– 337Schöttke, H. Bartram, M. Wiedl, K.H. (1993). Psychometric implications of learning potential assessment: A typological approach. In J.H.M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 153-173). Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets and ZeitlingerVygotsky, L.S. (1934). Thought and language (original work published 1934). Cambridge, MA: MIT PressWiedl, K.H. (1999). Assessing cognitive modifiability as a supplement to readiness for rehabilitation in schizophrenic persons. Psychiatric Services, (in press)Wiedl, K.H. Schöttke, H. (1995). Dynamic assessment of selective attention in schizophrenic subjects: The analysis of intraindividual variability of performance. In J.S. Carlson (Ed.), European contributions to dynamic assessment (pp. 185-208). London: JAI Press LtdWiedl, K.H. Wienöbst, J. (1999). Interindividual differences in cognitive remediation research with schizophrenic patients. Indicators of rehabilitation potential?. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 22, 1– 5Wiedl, K.H. Wienöbst, J. Schöttke, H. (2000). Estimating rehabilitation potential in schizophrenic subjects. In H.-D. Brenner, W. Böker, & R. Genner (Eds.), The treatment of schizophrenia: Status and emerging trends. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber PublishersWiedl, K.H. Wienöbst, J. Schöttke, H. Green, M.F. Nuechterlein, K.H. (2000). Attentional characteristics of schizophrenic patients differing in learning proficiency in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Schizophrenia Bulletin, (in press)Wiedl, K.H. Wienöbst, J. Schöttke, H. Kauffeldt, S. (1999). Differentielle Aspekte kognitiver Remediation bei schizophren Erkrankten auf der Grundlage des Wisconsin Card Sorting Tests. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 28, 214– 219