Parents' Judgments and Students' Self-Judgments of Empathy
Abstract
Summary: A sample of 221 adolescents and their parents were asked to complete the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI; Davis, 1980), which is comprised of four subscales: empathic concern, perspective taking, fantasy, and personal distress; and a global-item measure containing four items, one for each subscale. The factorial structure that emerged in a previous study (Cliffordson, 2000) involving the students was tested on ratings provided by their parents. The results from the IRI scale were also compared to results from the global-item measure. Structural equation modeling was used to examine the structure of empathy and the agreement of self/other judgments. The results support the conclusions from the previous study that the concept of empathy can be considered to be identical to empathic concern, which also explains a great deal of perspective taking and fantasy. The agreement between the students' and their parents' judgments was substantial, and there are several reasons to believe that the interjudge agreement obtained is accurate.
References
References
Arbuckle, J.L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G.A. Marcoulides & R.E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling. Issues and techniques. Mahwah, NJ: ErlbaumArbuckle, J.L. (1997). Amos Users' Guide. Version 3.6 . Chicago, IL: SmallWaters CorporationBollen, K. Long, J.S. (1993). Testing structural equation models . Newbury Park, CA: SageCliffordson, C. (2000). The structure of empathy: An analysis of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) . Manuscript submitted for publicationColvin, C.R. Vogt, D. Ickes, W. (1997). Why do friends understand each other better than strangers do?. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Empathic accuracy. London: GuilfordCronbach, L.J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity”. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177– 193Cronbach, L.J. Gleser, G.C. Nanda, H. Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements . New York: WileyCronbach, L.J. Meehl, P.E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281– 302Davis, M.H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85– 85Davis, M.H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113– 126Davis, M.H. (1996). Empathy - A social psychological approach . Boulder, CO: Westview PressFunder, D.C. (1980). On seeing ourselves as other see us: Self-other agreement and discrepancy in personality ratings. Journal of Personality, 48, 473– 493Funder, D.C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 75– 90Funder, D.C. Colvin, C.R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149– 158Funder, D.C. Colvin, C.R. (1997). Congruence of others' and self-judgments of personality. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson & S. Briggs (Ed.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 617-647). London: Academic PressGustafsson, J.-E. Stahl, P.A. (1997). STREAMS User's guide, Version 1.7. for Windows . Mölndal, Sweden: Multivariate-WareGustafsson, J.-E. Stahl, P.A. (1998). STREAMS User's guide, Version 2.0. for Windows . Mölndal, Sweden: Multivariate-WareHofstee, W.K.B. (1994). Who should own the definition of personality?. European Journal of Personality 8, 149– 162Hogan, R. (1969). Development of an empathy scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 307– 316Johnson, J.A. Cheek, J.M. Smither, R. (1983). The structure of empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1299– 1312Jöreskog, K.G. Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user's reference guide (2nd ed.). Chicago: Scientific SoftwareKulich, K.M. Bengtsson, H. (1997). Swedish dental students' and dentists' self-perceived interpersonal skills measured by self-report inventories . Manuscript in preparationKunda, Z. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 636– 647Litvack-Miller, W. McDougall, D. Romney, D.M. (1997). The structure of empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 123, 303– 324Maruyama, G.M. (1997). Basics of structural equation modeling . London: SageMehrabian, A. Epstein, N.A. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525– 543Muthén, B. O. Kaplan, D. Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52, 431– 462Pedhazur, E.J. Pedhazur Schmelkin, L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach . Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumRiggio, E. Tucker, J. Coffaro, D. (1989). Social skills and empathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 93– 99Snow, R.E. Corno, L. Jackson III, D. (1996). Individual differences in affective and conative functions. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 243-310). New York: Simon & Schuster MacmillanStinson, L. Ickes, W. (1992). Empathic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 787– 797Wise, P.S. Cramer, S.H. (1988). Correlates of empathy and cognitive style in early adolescence. Psychological Reports, 63, 179– 192
