Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Nach der ideo-motorischen Hypothese werden Aktionen mit ihren kontingenten sensorischen Effekten bidirektional verbunden, so dass eine Antizipation der Effekte direkt die Aktionen aktiviert, die erfahrungsgemäß das Antizipierte hervorbringen. Wir diskutieren (1) die Rolle von exterozeptiven und propriozeptiven Effekten, (2) die Situationsabhängigkeit von Aktions-Effekt Beziehungen, (3) die Notwendigkeit abstrakter effektorunspezifischer Aktionsrepräsentationen und schließlich (4) die Verwertung von sensorischen Rückmeldungen bei der Kontrolle der Aktionsausführung. Unsere Diskussion führt zu einer hypothetischen Struktur ideo-motorischer Beziehungen, in der die “Idee” (das antizipierte Ziel) die “Motorik” (die Körperbewegung) über eine Kaskade von inversen Modellen determiniert.
Abstract. The ideomotor hypothesis predicts that actions become connected bidirectionally with their sensory effects so that anticipations of the effects directly trigger the actions that have been learned to produce them. This article discusses (1) the role of both exteroceptive and proprioceptive effects, (2) the dependency of action-effect relations on the current situation, (3) the need for more abstract, effector-unspecific action representations, and finally (4) the use of sensory feedback in action control. The discussion leads to the formulation of a tentative structure of ideomotor relations in which the ”idea” (anticipated goal) determines the ”motor activity” (body movements) over a cascade of inverse models.
References
Ach, N. (1932). Finale Qualität (Gefügigkeitsqualität) und Objektion. Archiv für die Gesamte Psychologie . (Zweiter Ergänzungsband, S. 267-366). Leipzig: Akademische VerlagsgesellschaftAdams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111– 149Ansorge, U. (2002). Spatial intention - response compatibility. Acta Psychologica, 109, 285– 299Ansorge, U. (2006). Die Rolle von Absichten bei der automatischen Verarbeitung visuell-räumlicher Informationen. Psychologische Rundschau, 57, 2– 12Beckers, T. , DeHouwer, J. , Eelen, P. (2002). Automatic integration of non-perceptual action effect features: The case of the associative affective Simon effect. Psychological Research, 66, 166– 173Berner, M. , Hoffmann, J. in press Effector-related sequence learning in a bimannual-biseqeuntial serial reaction time task. Psychological Research, –Butz, M. V. , Herbort, O. , Hoffmann, J. (2007). Exploiting redundancy for flexible behavior: Unsupervised learning of a modular sensorimotor control architecture . Manuscript submitted for publicationCole, J. (1995). Pride and a daily marathon . Cambridge, MA: MIT PressColwill, R. M. , Rescorla, R. A. (1990). Effect of reinforcer devaluation on discriminative control of instrumental behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 16, 40– 47Criscimagna-Hemminger, S. E. , Donchin, O. , Gazzaniga, M. S. , Shadmehr, R. (2003). Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 168– 176Desmurget, M. , Grafton, S. (2000). Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4, 423– 431Dickinson, A. (1994). Instrumental conditioning. In N. J. Mackintosh (Ed.), Animal learning and cognition (pp. 45-79). San Diego, CA: Academic PressElsner, B. , Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229– 240Elsner, B. , Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research, 68, 138– 154Greenwald, A. G. (1970a). A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 20– 25Greenwald, A. G. (1970b). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73– 99Harleß, E. (1861). Der Apparat des Willens. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 38, 50– 73Hazeltine, E. (2002). The representational nature of sequence learning: Evidence for goal-based codes. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.), Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention and Performance XIX (pp. 673-689). Oxford: Oxford University PressHerbart, J. F. (1825). Psychologie als Wissenschaft neu gegründet auf Erfahrung, Metaphysik und Mathematik. Zweiter, analytischer Teil . Königsberg: August Wilhelm UnzerHerbort, O. , Butz, M. V. , Hoffmann, J. (2005). Towards an adaptive hierarchical anticipatory behavioral control system. In C. Castelfranchi, C. Balkenius, M. V. Butz & A. Ortony (Eds.), From reactive to anticipatory cognitive embodied systems: Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium (pp. 83-90). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI PressHeuer, H. (1983). Bewegungslernen . Stuttgart: KohlhammerHinton, G. E. (1989). Connectionist learning procedures. Artificial Intelligence, 40, 185– 234Hoffmann, J. (1993). Vorhersage und Erkenntnis: Die Funktion von Antizipationen in der menschlichen Verhaltenssteuerung und Wahrnehmung . Göttingen: HogrefeHoffmann, J. (2001). Das ideomotorische Prinzip, ABC, Closed Loops und Schemata. In J. R. Nitsch & H. Allmer (Hrsg.), Denken-Sprechen-Bewegen, Bericht über die 32. Tagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Sportpsychologie (asp) vom 1. bis 3. Juni 2000 in Köln (S. 69-75). Köln: bpsHoffmann, J. (2003). Anticipatory behavioral control. In M. Butz, O. Sigaud & P. Gerard (Eds.), Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems (pp. 44-65). Heidelberg: SpringerHoffmann, J. , Lenhard, A. (2004). Psychology has to deal with efferences too. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 384– 385Hoffmann, J. , Sebald, A. (2000). Lernmechanismen zum Erwerb verhaltenssteuernden Wissens. Psychologische Rundschau, 51, 1– 9Hommel, B. (1996). The cognitive representation of action: Automatic integration of perceived action effects. Psychological Research, 59, 176– 186Hommel, B. (1998). Perceiving one´s own action - and what it leads to. In J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Systems theory and apriori aspects of perception (pp. 143-179). Amsterdam: ElsevierHommel, B. (2003). Acquisition and control of voluntary action. In S. Maasen, W. Prinz & G. Roth (Eds.), Voluntary action: Brain, Minds, and sociality (pp. 34-48). Oxford: University PressHommel, B. , Alonso, D. , Fuentes, L. J. (2003). Acquisition and generalization of action effects. Visual Cognition, 10, 965– 986James, W. (1981). The principles of psychology . (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (orig. 1890)Jordan, M. I. , Rumelhart, D. E. (1992). Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive Science, 16, 307– 354Kalveram, K. T. (2004). The inverse problem in cognitive, perceptual and proprioceptive control of sensorimotor behaviour: Towards a biologically plausible model of the control of aiming movements. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2, 255– 273Kunde, W (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387– 394Kunde, W. (2003). Temporal response-effect compatibility. Psychological Research, 67, 153– 159Kunde, W. (2006). Antezedente Effektrepräsentationen in der Verhaltenssteuerung. Psychologische Rundschau, 57, 34– 42Kunde, W. , Hoffmann, J. , Zellmann, P. (2002). The impact of anticipated action effects on action planning. Acta Psychologica, 109, 137– 155Kunde, W. , Koch, I. , Hoffmann, J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation and execution of actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 57A, 87– 106Laycock, T. (1845). On the reflex functions of the brain . (pp. 1-16). Bartholomew Close, UK: AdlardLenhard, A. , Hoffmann, J. (2004). Adaptation von Handbewegungen an targetspezifische virtuelle Zielverlagerungen . Vortrag auf der 46. Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen in GießenMechsner, F. (2004). A psychological approach to bimanual coordination. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36, 355– 370Miller, G. A. , Galanter, E. , Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior . New York: Holt, Rinehart, and WinstonMünsterberg, H. (1889). Beiträge zur Experimentalpsychologie. Heft 1 . Freiburg i. B.: MohrNeisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology . New York: AppletonPaelecke, M. , Kunde, W. (2005). How the mind controls the body: Anticipatory effect codes in action planning. In D. T. Rosen (Ed.), Trends in experimental psychology research (pp. 187-202). New York: Nova SciencePowers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception . Oxford: AldinePrinz, W. (1987). Ideomotor action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 47-76). Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumPrinz, W. (1992). Why don't we perceive our brain states?. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1– 20Prinz, W. (1998). Die Reaktion als Willenshandlung. Psychologische Rundschau, 49, 10– 20Proteau, L. , Marteniuk, R. G. , Girouard, Y. , Dugas, C. (1987). On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training. Human Movement Science, 6, 181– 199Rieger, M. (2004). Automatic keypress activation in skilled typing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 555– 565Rosenbaum, D. A. , Loukopoulus, L. D. , Meulenbroek, R. G. J. , Vaughan, J. , Engelbrecht, S. E. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102, 28– 67Rosenbaum, D. A. , Meulenbroek, R. G. J. , Vaughan, J. , Jansen, C. (2001). Posture-based motion planning:Applications to grasping. Psychological Review, 108, 709– 734Sainburg, R. L. , Wang, J. (2002). Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: Independence of direction and final position information. Experimental Brain Research, 145, 437– 447Schicke, T. , Röder, B. (2006). Spatial remapping of touch: confusion of perceived stimulus order across hand and foot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 11808– 11813Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225– 260Simon, J. R. , Rudel, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300– 304Spence, C. , Driver, J. (2004). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention . Oxford: University PressStock, A. , Hoffmann, J. (2002). Intentional fixation of behavioural learning, or how R-O learning blocks S-R learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 127– 153Stock, A. , Stock, C. (2004). A short history of ideo-motor action. Psychological Research, 68, 176– 188Stöcker, C. , Sebald, A. , Hoffmann, J. (2003). The influence of response-effect compatibility in a serial reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 685– 703Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Ideo-motor action. Psychological Review, 20, 91– 106Verwey, W. B. , Clegg, B. A. (2005). Effector dependent sequence learning in the serial RT task. Psychological Research, 69, 242– 251Verwey, W. B. , Wright, D. L. (2004). Effector-independent and effector-dependent learning in the discrete sequence production task. Psychological Research, 68, 64– 70Wasserman, E. A. , Elek, S. M. , Chatlosh, D. L. , Baker, A. G. (1993). Rating causal relations: Role of probability in judgements of response-outcome contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 174– 188Ziessler, M. (1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 962– 978Ziessler, M. , Nattkemper, D. , Frensch, P. A. (2004). The role of anticipation and intention in the learning of effects of self-performed actions. Psychological Research, 68, 163– 175
