Familienfunktionalität und familiäre Beziehungen im Perspektivenvergleich
Effekte einer manualisierten Intervention für Familien mit einem psychisch kranken Elternteil
Abstract
Zusammenfassung. Die Familienfunktionalität und die Familienbeziehungen werden aus der Perspektive der Familie (erkrankter Elternteil, Lebenspartner, Kind) mit dem Allgemeinen Familienbogen FB-A und aus der Perspektive der Therapeuten mit der GARF-Skala erfasst. Die Stichprobe besteht aus 19 Familien in der Interventionsgruppe und 14 Familien in der Kontrollgruppe. In die Analyse gingen Daten aus drei Messzeitpunkten (vor der Intervention, nach Abschluss der Intervention und ein Jahr nach Abschluss der Intervention) ein. Die Familienfunktionalität aus der Perspektive des erkrankten Elternteils verbesserte sich in der Interventionsgruppe im Vergleich zur Kontrollgruppe in der Skala Aufgabenerfüllung und in den Beziehungsskalen Emotionalität und Affektive Beziehungsaufnahme. Eine Verbesserung der Familienfunktionalität aus der Therapeutenperspektive wird deutlich, aber der Effekt durch einen gegenläufige Veränderung der Kontrollgruppe und einen signifikanten Interaktionseffekt verhindert. Im Verlauf über drei Messzeitpunkte verbesserten sich aus der Perspektive der erkrankten Elternteile der Gesamtwert, die Kommunikation, die Aufgabenerfüllung und die Werte und Normen. Die Verbesserungen zeigten sich jedoch nur aus der Perspektive der erkrankten Elternteile. Die Veränderungen aus der Perspektive der Lebenspartner und Kinder erreichen keine Signifikanz.
Abstract. Children of parents with mental health problems represent a high-risk group for developing mental health problems themselves. Beside genetic factors, environmental factors – such as socioeconomic status, family characteristics, and stressful life events – are involved in the transmission of mental health problems from one generation to the next. Family functioning is a complex, multidimensional construct encompassing several conceptual domains. In families with parental mental health problems, family functioning is clearly impaired in contrast to the total population. Family functioning is an important factor for the course of parental mental problems but also particularly for the mental development of the children, with an impaired family functioning predicting impaired mental development of the children. Therefore, family functioning has become a focus of family interventions that are aimed at reducing transgenerational dissemination of mental health problems. Beardslee and colleagues developed a cognitive behavioral prevention program for families with depressive parents that showed, among others, a lower incidence for depressive symptoms in children after a 6-year follow-up compared with the control group. At the same time, there is a lack of experimentally controlled intervention programs for children of mentally ill parents in German-speaking countries. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the family-oriented intervention program CHIMPs (children of mentally ill parents) with regard to changes in the criterion of family functioning. The CHIMPs intervention is based on the model of psychosocial mediation by Mattejat and colleagues, the work of Beardslee and colleagues, and an assessment of need results. Family functioning was assessed via the indications of all family members (mentally ill parent, partner, child) on the Allgemeinen Familienbogen (FB-A) as well as the indications of the therapist on the GARF scale. The sample consisted of 19 families in the intervention group and 14 families in the control group. Data from three measurement points (before the intervention, after the intervention, and 1 year after completion of the intervention) where analyzed. Compared with the control group, mentally ill parents who took part in the intervention group improved in the scale of Task Fulfilment and the relationship scales Emotionality and Affective Family Relationships of the FB-A. Therapists’ indications about family functioning suggested improvement; however, this effect is countered by a change in the opposite direction of the control group, impeding a significant intervention effect. Over all three measurement points (pre–post, 1 year follow-up) the total scores of the scales Communication, Task Fulfilment, and Values and Norms within the family improved. However, the improvement was restricted to the indications of mentally ill parents only. Changes in family functioning as indicated by the partner and children were not significant. The results show evidence of an improvement in family functioning from the mentally ill parent’s perspective after the CHIMPs intervention.
Literatur
2003). A family-based approach to the prevention of depressive symptoms in children at risk: Evidence of parental and child change. Pediatrics, 112, E119-E131.
(2007). Long-term effects from a randomized trial of two public health preventive internventions for parental depression. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 703 – 713.
(2006). Family issues in child anxiety: Attachment, family functioning, parental rearing and beliefs. Clinical Psychology Review 26, 834 – 856.
(2000). Chronicity, severity, and timing of maternal depressive symptoms: Relationships with the child outcome at age 5. Developmental Psychology, 36, 759 – 766.
(2015). Effect of a cognitive-behavioral prevention program on depression 6 years after implementation among at-risk adolescents: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, online September 30, 2015
(1994). Die Familienbögen. Ein Inventar zur Einschätzung von Familienfunktionen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2001). A randomized trial of a group cognitive intervention for preventing depression in adolescent offspring of depressed parents. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 1127 – 1134.
(2005). Towards a family process model of maternal and paternal depressive symptoms: exploring multiple relations with child and family functioning. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 479 – 489.
(2012). Predicting depression in mothers with and without HIV: The role of social support and family dynamics. Aids and Behavior, 16, 2198 – 2208.
(2015). Increasing understanding in children of depressed parents: Predictors and moderators of intervention response. Depression Research and Treatment, 2015, doi: 10.1155/2015/347971
(2004). Family discord and stress predictors of depression and other disorders in adolescent children of depressed and nondepressed women. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 994 – 1002.
(2014). Psychische Auffälligkeiten und psychosoziale Beeinträchtigungen bei Kindern und Jugendlichen im Alter von 3 bis 17 Jahren in Deutschland – Prävalenz und zeitliche Trends zu 2 Erhebungszeitpunkten (2003 – 2006 und 2009 – 2012). Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz, 57, 807 – 819.
(2008). Longitudinal relations between parental drinking problems, family functioning, and child adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 195 – 212.
(2013). Maternal Depression, Family Functioning and Children’s Longitudinal Development. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 28, 223 – 234.
(2000). Kinder psychisch kranker Eltern. Forschungsperspektiven am Beispiel von Kindern depressiver Eltern. Nervenarzt, 71, 164 – 172.
(2012). Parent psychopathology and offspring mental disorders: results from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. British Journal of Psychiatry, 200, 290 – 299.
(2016). Faktoren der Gesunderhaltung bei Kindern psychisch belasteter Eltern: Ergebnisse der BELLA-Studie. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 25, 41-49.
(2008). Die Funktionalität von Familien mit einem psychisch kranken Elterteil. Zusammenhänge zum elterlichen Bindungsmuster und zur elterlichen Erkrankung. Familiendynamik, 33, 274 – 287.
(2011). Paternal Depression: An examination of its links with father, child and family functioning in the postnatal period. Depression and Anxiety, 28, 471 – 477.
(2015). Parental psychopathology and treatment outcome for anxious youth: Roles of family functioning and caregiver strain. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83, 213 – 224.
(2015). The roles of resilience and childhood trauma history: Main and moderating effects on postpartum maternal mental health and functioning. Journal of Affective Disorders, 174, 532 – 568.
(2012). Effect of preventive interventions in mentally ill parents on the mental health of the offspring: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51, 8 – 17.
(2014). Effects of structural and dynamic family characteristics on the development of depressive and aggressive problems during adolescence. The TRAILS study. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 23, 499 – 513.
(2004). Genotype-environment interaction in schizophrenia-spectrum disorder. Long-term follow-up study of Finnish adoptees. British Journal of Psychiatry, 184, 217 – 222.
(2011). Prenatal and postnatal psychological symptoms of parents and family functioning: the impact on child emotional and behavioural problems. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 20, 341 – 350.
(2013). Krankheitsbewältigung psychisch kranker Eltern und psychische Auffälligkeiten ihrer Kinder im Fokus einer manualisierten Familienintervention. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 61, 51 – 58.
(2013). Psychische Auffälligkeiten von Kindern psychisch kranker Eltern im Perspektivenvergleich. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 22, 31 – 40.
(2015). CHIMPs – Ein multizentrisches Projekt für Kinder psychisch kranker Eltern. Dialog Erziehungshilfe, 1, 35 – 38.
(2011). Kinder und ihre psychisch kranken Eltern: Familienorientierte Prävention – Der CHIMPs-Beratungsansatz. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
(2012). Gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität und soziale Unterstützung von Kindern psychisch kranker Eltern. Kindheit und Entwicklung, 21, 64 – 73.
(2008). Risk and protective factors for children’s and adolescents’ mental health: results of the BELLA study. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 17, 133 – 147.
(