The Erlangen Instrument of Alternating Word Fluency in Dementia (EAWF-D)
A New Assessment Tool Combining Set-Shifting and Semantic Word Fluency
Abstract
The Erlangen Instrument of Alternating Word Fluency in Dementia (EAWF-D) is a new alternating word fluency task that combines set-shifting and semantic word fluency based on psycholinguistic theory that the ability to switch between two different semantic categories should already be impaired in beginning dementia. N = 138 (58.7% female; age: M = 73.9; SD = 7.03) outpatients of a memory clinic were diagnosed according to the ICD-10 criteria: subjective memory complainers (N = 60), mild cognitive impairment (N = 37), and mild to moderate dementia (N = 41). An analysis of variance of the EAWF-D revealed a significant main effect of diagnosis (F(2, 135) = 46.7; p < .001; η² = .41). The EAWF-D score correlates significantly with the MMSE total score (r = .54, p < .001) as well as with MMSE subscores “Orientation” (r = .41, p < .001) and “Recall” (r = .53, p < .001). Ordinal logistic regression analysis confirmed the potential for diagnosis of beginning dementia.
References
1982). Limits of the Mini-Mental-State as a screening test for dementia and delirium among hospital patients. Psychological Medicine, 12, 397–408.
(2008). Trail Making Test errors in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23, 129–137.
(1969 ). A linguistic feature study of aphasic responses to a free word association task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.1984). Cognitive and motor shifting aptitude disorder in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 47, 443–453.
(2000). Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen. ICD-10 Kapitel V (F) Klinisch-diagnostische Leitlinien (4. Aufl.). Bern: Huber.
(1985). The effect of Parkinson’s disease on the ability to maintain a mental set. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 48, 517–529.
(1975). Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
(1988). “Frontal” cognitive function in patients with Parkinson’s disease “on” and “off” levodopa. Brain, 111 (Pt 2), 299–321.
(1990). Parkinson’s disease and the frontal hypothesis: Task alternation in verbal fluency. Advances in Neurology, 53, 321–325.
(2006). Covariates of production and perseveration on tests of phonemic, semantic and alternating fluency in normal aging. Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 13, 529–551.
(1956). Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(2008). Screening for cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease with the Parkinson neuropsychometric dementia assessment (PANDA) instrument. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 14, 93–101.
(2009). Increasing levels of semantic verbal fluency in elderly English adults. Neuropsychology, Development, and Cognition. Section B, Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 16, 433–445.
(2006). Category and letter fluency in semantic dementia, primary progressive aphasia, and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Language, 97, 258–265.
(1988). Consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD) clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24, 641–652.
(1969). Missile wounds of the brain: A study of psychological deficits. London: Oxford University Press.
(1955). The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 19, 393–394.
(1997). Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: Evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 11, 138–146.
(1998). Clustering and switching on verbal fluency: The effects of focal frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 36, 499–504.
(1998). Clustering and switching on verbal fluency tests in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 137–143.
(