Short German Versions of Empathizing and Systemizing Self-Assessment Scales
Abstract
Short German-language versions of empathizing and systemizing self-assessment scales have been developed based on the questionnaires by Baron-Cohen and colleagues (e.g., Baron-Cohen, Richler, Bisarya, Gurunathan, & Wheelwright, S., 2003; Baron-Cohen, 2004). According to the E-S theory, empathizing is characterized by the drive to cognize emotional and cognitive mental states in others and to react to these in an appropriate manner. In contrast, systemizing circumscribes the interest in systems, which includes analyzing, constructing, predicting, and controlling it. The present study pursued two goals: First, to provide a psychometrically tested measure of the constructs in German language; second, to provide a short form of the scale to reduce participants’ work load. Study 1 (N = 206) used factor analyses to select a subset of the 80 items used in the Baron-Cohen et al. Study 2 (N = 201) demonstrated the internal consistency and stability of the new empathizing and systemizing scales with 13 items each. Study 3 (N = 122) revealed high retest reliabilities.
References
(1997). Are children with autism superior at folk physics? In , The emergence of core domains of thought: Children’s reasoning about physical, psychological and biological phenomena (pp. 45–54). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
(2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 248–254.
(2004). Vom ersten Tag anders: Das weibliche und das männliche Gehirn [
The essential difference: Men, women and the extreme male brain ]. Düsseldorf, Germany: Walter.(2004). The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Development Disorder, 34, 163–175.
(2003). The systemizing quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. In , Autism: Mind and brain (pp. 161–186). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
(2007). Empathizing and systemizing cognitive traits in the sciences and humanities. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 619–625.
(2005). Empathizing and systemizing in males and females, and in autism. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 2, 338–345.
(2007, June). Intra- and interpersonal emotion regulation and socioaffective dispositions. Poster presented at the NCCR Panel, Geneva, Switzerland.
(2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the empathy quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34, 911–924.
(2004). Empathizing and systemizing in adults with and without Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 301–310.
(1994). ToMM, ToBy, and agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In , Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 119–148). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(1995). Causal cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(in press). The influence of empathizing and systemizing on humor processing: Theory of mind and humor. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research.
(2010). Stimulus characteristics affect humor processing in individuals with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 438–447.
(2006). Development of short forms of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short) and the Systemizing Quotient (SQ-Short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 929–940.
