Skip to main content
Search
Search
    Quick Search anywhere
    Quick search in Citations
Advanced Search
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Previous article
Next article
Original Communication

Psychometrics of the Dyadic Coping Inventory in Three Language Groups

Published Online:November 29, 2010https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000024

Abstract

This article introduces the Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI; Bodenmann, 2008) and aims (1) to investigate the reliability and aspects of the validity of the Italian and French versions of the DCI, and (2) to replicate its factor structure and reliabilities using a new Swiss German sample. Based on 216 German-, 378 Italian-, and 198 French-speaking participants, the factor structure of the original German inventory was able to be replicated by using principal components analysis in all three groups after excluding two items in the Italian and French versions. The latter were shown to be as reliable as the German version with the exception of the low reliabilities of negative dyadic coping in the French group. Confirmatory factor analyses provided additional support for delegated dyadic coping and evaluation of dyadic coping. Intercorrelations among scales were similar across all three languages groups with a few exceptions. Previous findings could be replicated in all three groups, showing that aspects of dyadic coping were more strongly related to marital quality than to dyadic communication. The use of the dyadic coping scales in the actor-partner interdependence model, the common fate model, and the mutual influence model is discussed.

References

  • Barbee, A. P. (1990). Interactive coping: The cheering-up process in close relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 46–65). London, UK: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Berg, C. A., Meegan, S. P., Deviney, F. P. (1998). A social contextual model of coping with everyday problems across the life span. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22, 239–261. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (1995). A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54, 34–49. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (1997). Dyadic coping – a systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137–140. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (2000). Stress und Coping bei Paaren [Stress and coping in couples]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In T. Revenson, K. Kayser, G. Bodenmann (Eds.), Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadisches Coping Inventar: Testmanual [Dyadic Coping Inventory: Test manual]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G., Cina, A. (2006). Stress and coping among stable-satisfied, stable-distressed and separated/divorced Swiss couples: A 5-year prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 44, 71–89. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G., Perrez, M. (1991). Dyadisches Coping: Eine systemische Betrachtungsweise der Belastungsbewältigung in Partnerschaften [Dyadic coping: A systemic perspective on coping in couples]. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 3, 4–25. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G., Ledermann, T., Bradbury, T. N. (2007). Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage. Personal Relationships, 14, 551–569. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Bodenmann, G., Pihet, S., Kayser, K. (2006). The relationship between dyadic coping, marital quality, and well-being: A two year longitudinal study. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 485–493. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Buchwald, P., Schwarzer, C., Hobfoll, S. E. (Eds.). (2004). Stress gemeinsam bewältigen: Ressourcenmanagement und multiaxiales Coping [Coping with stress together: Resource management and multiaxial coping]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Christensen, A. (1988). Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. In P. Noller, M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 31–52). Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Christensen, A., Sullaway, M. (1984). Communication patterns questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript. Los Angeles, CA: University of California. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Coyne, J. C., Smith, D. A. F. (1991). Couples coping with a myocardial infarction: A contextual perspective on wives’ distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 404–412. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Coyne, J. C., Smith, D. A. F. (1994). Couples coping with myocardial infarction: Contextual perspective on patient self-efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 1–13. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Coyne, J. C., Ellard, J. H., Smith, D. A. (1990). Unsupportive relationships, interdependence, and unhelpful exchanges. In I. G. Sarason, B. R. Sarason, G. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 129–149). New York: Wiley. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Cutrona, C. (1996). Social support in couples: Marriage as a resource in times of stress. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • DeLongis, A., O’Brien, T. (1990). An interpersonal framework for stress and coping: An application to the families of Alzheimer’s patients. In M. A. P. Stephens, J. H. Crowther, S. E. Hobfoll, D. L. Tennenbaum (Eds.), Stress and coping in later-life families (pp. 221–240). New York: Hemisphere. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gmelch, S., Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., Ledermann, T., Steffen-Sozinova, O., Striegl, K. (2008). Dyadisches Coping Inventar (DCI): Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung des partnerschaftlichen Umgangs mit Stress [Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI): A questionnaire assessing dyadic coping in couples]. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 20, 185–203. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Griffin, D. W., Gonzalez, R. (1995). Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 430–445. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Hahlweg, K. (1996). Fragebogen zur Partnerschaftsdiagnostik (FPD) [Partnership questionnaire]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, culture, and community. New York: Plenum. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Horn, J. L., McArdle, J. J., Mason, R. (1983). When is invariance not invariant: A practical scientist’s look at the ethereal concept of factor invariance. Southern Psychologist, 4, 179–188. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Kayser, K., Sormanti, M., Strainchamps, E. (1999). Women coping with cancer: The influence of relationship factors on psychosocial adjustment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 725–739. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Kenny, D. A. (1996). Models of nonindependence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 279–294. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Lazarus, R. S., Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Ledermann, T., Macho, S. (2009). Mediation in dyadic data at the level of the dyads: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 661–670. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Ledermann, T., Bodenmann, G., Cina, A. (2007). The efficacy of the Couples Coping Enhancement Training (CCET) in improving relationship quality. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 940–959. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Lyons, R. F., Mickelson, K. D., Sullivan, M. J. L., Coyne, J. C. (1998). Coping as a communal process. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 579–605. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Pearlin, L. I., Schooler, C. (1978). The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2–21. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Randall, A. K., Bodenmann, G. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105–115. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Schumacker, R. E., Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Vandenberg, R. J., Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Widmer, K., Bodenmann, G. (2000). Alltagsstress, Coping und Befindlichkeit: Paare im Geschlechtervergleich [Everyday stress, coping and well-being in couples: An analysis of gender differences]. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie, 9, 17–26. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Williamson, G. M., Clark, M. S. (1992). Impact of desired relationship type on affective reactions to choosing and being required to help. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 10–18. First citation in articleCrossref, Google Scholar

  • Winkeler, M., Klauer, T. (2003). Inventar zur sozialen Unterstützung in Dyaden (ISU-DYA): Konstruktionshintergrund und erste Ergebnisse zur Reliabilität und Validität [Inventory of social support in dyads: Construction and initial results on reliability and validity]. Diagnostica, 49, 12–23. First citation in articleLink, Google Scholar