Skip to main content
Log in

Health-related quality of life in childhood disorders: A modified focus group technique to involve children

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: Qualitative methodology has been under-utilized in child health research due to lack of a specific set of instruments. The objective of this study was to develop a child-centred qualitative research methodology to facilitate direct exploration of health-related quality of life (HRQL) issues and to identify the quality of life elements in pre-adolescent children with a chronic medical condition. Study Design: Purposeful stratified sampling of children, ages 6–12, who function in a regular school class, with active epilepsy who were assembled in small focus groups. The groups met in four phases and were led by moderators who probed preset open questions and activities. Results: The study demonstrated that our modified focus groups process was a powerful exploratory experience eliciting meaningful and important issues in quality of life beyond what parents and health professionals expected, and helped identify HRQL elements in childhood epilepsy. Conclusion: Modified focus groups are appropriate and suitable to explore quality of life issues in pre-adolescent children with a chronic medical condition. The process is feasible and trustworthy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bradlyn AS, Ritchey AK, Harris CV. Quality of life research in pediatric oncology: Research methods and barriers. Cancer 1996; 78: 1833–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schipper H, Clinch JJ, Olweny LM. Quality of life studies: Definitions and conceptual issues. In: Spilker B (ed.) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1996: 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crabtree BJ, Miller WL (eds). Doing qualitative research. Research methods for primary care, Vol. 3, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 1991.

  4. Goering PN, Streiner DL. Reconcilable differences: The marriage of qualitative and quantitative methods. Can J Psychiatry 1996; 41: 491–497.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Folch-Lyon E, Trost JF. Conducting focus group sessions. Stud Fam Plann 1981; 12: 443–449.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Editorial. Population health looking upstream. Lancet 1994; 343: 429–430.

  7. Hoppe MJ, Wells EA, Morrison DM, Gillmore MR, Wilsdon A. Using focus groups to discuss sensitive topics with children. Eval Rev 1995; 19: 102–114.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fiese BH, Bickham NL. Qualitative inquiry: An overview for pediatric psychology. J Pediatr Psychol 1998; 23: 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jenney ME, Campbell S. Measuring quality of life. Arch Dis Child 1997; 77: 347–350.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Landgraf JM, Abetz LN. Measuring Health outcomes in pediatric populations: Issue in psychometrics and application. In: Spilker B (ed.) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 1996: 793–802.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McLauglin JF, Bjornson K. Quality of Life and developmental disabilities, editorial. Dev Med Child Neurol 1998; 40: 435.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ronen GM, Rosenbaum P, Law M, Streiner DL. Health-related quality of life in childhood epilepsy: The results of children's participating in identifying the components. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999; 41: 554–559.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Patton MW. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: WL Sage Publication, 1990: 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krueger RA. Focus groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eiser C. Children's quality of life measures. Arch Dis Child 1997; 77: 350–354.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Chap. 11, Establishing Trustworthiness. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1985: 284–331.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoppe MJ, Wells EA, Wilsdon A, Gillmore MR, Morrison DM. Children's knowledge and beliefs about AIDS: Qualitative data from focus group interviews. Health Educ Q 1994; 21: 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Worden JK, Flynn BS, Geller BM, et al. Development of a smoking prevention mass media program using diagnostic and formative research. Prev Med 1988; 17: 531–558.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hockenberry-Eaton M, Hinds PS, Alcoser P, et al. Fatigue in children and adolescents with cancer. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 1998; 15: 172–182.

    Google Scholar 

  21. French DJ, Carroll A, Christie MJ. Health-related quality of life in Australian children with asthma: Lessons for the cross-cultural use of quality of life instruments. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 409–419.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rae WA. Analyzing drawings of children who are physically ill and hospitalized, using the ipsative method. Child Health Care 1991; 20: 198–207.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Denzin NK. Sociological Methods: A Source Book, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ronen, G.M., Rosenbaum, P., Law, M. et al. Health-related quality of life in childhood disorders: A modified focus group technique to involve children. Qual Life Res 10, 71–79 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016659917227

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016659917227

Navigation