Abstract
The development and initial psychometric studies for the Ohio Youth Problems, Functioning, and Satisfaction Scales (Ohio Scales) are described. The Ohio Scales were developed to be practical yet rigorous, multi-content, multi-source measures of outcome for children and adolescents receiving mental health services. Initial studies suggest that the Ohio Scales are promising (reliable, valid, and sensitive to change) measures that can be used to track the effectiveness of mental health interventions for youth with serious emotional disorders. Additional studies are warranted to expand the situations and populations within which the scales are valid.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Attkisson, C. C., & Zwick, R. (1982). The client satisfaction questionnaire: Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Evaluation and Program Planning, 5 233-237.
Bickman, L., Lambert, E. W., Karver, M. S., & Andrade, M. R. (1998). Two low-cost measures of child and adolescent functioning for services research. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21 263-275.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Frisch, M. B. (1994). Manual and treatment guide for the Quality of Life Inventory. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Assessments.
Hawkins, R. P., Almeida, M. C., Fabry, B., & Reitz, A. (1992). A scale to measure restrictiveness of living environments for troubles children and youths. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 43 54-58.
Hodges, K., & Wong, M. M. (1996). Psychometric characteristics of a multidimensional measure to assess impairment: The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5 445-467.
Ihilevich, D., & Glesser, G. C. (1982). Evaluating mental-health programs: The Progress Evaluation Scales. Lexington: DC Heath and Company.
Lambert, M., Ogles, B. M., & Masters, K. (1992). Choosing outcome assessment devices. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70 538-539.
Maruish, M. E. (Ed.) (1999). The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mordock, J. B. (2000). Outcome assessment: Suggestions for agency practice. Child Welfare, LXXIX 689-710.
Newman, F. L., Ciarlo, J. A., & Carpenter, D. (1999). Guidelines for selecting psychological instruments for treatment planning and outcome assessment. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (2nd ed.)(pp. 153-170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ogles, B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Masters, K. S. (1996). Assessing outcome in clinical practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Rosenblatt, A. (1998). A primer on outcome measures for children's services. Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow, August 41-43.
Sederer, L. I., & Dickey, B. (Eds.). (1996). Outcomes assessment in clinical practice. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
Shaffer, D., Gould, M. S., Brasic, J., Ambrosini, P., Fisher, P., Bird, H., & Aluwahilia, S. (1983). A Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). Archives of General Psychiatry, 40 1228-1231.
Weber, D. O. (1998). A field in its infancy: Measuring outcomes for children and adolescents. In K. J. Midgail (Ed.), The behavioral outcomes & guidelines sourcebook. Washington, DC: Faulkner and Gray's Healthcare Information Center.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ogles, B.M., Melendez, G., Davis, D.C. et al. The Ohio Scales: Practical Outcome Assessment. Journal of Child and Family Studies 10, 199–212 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016651508801
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016651508801