Abstract
Multidimensional scaling (MDS) is introduced and discussed as a graphical method to complement conventional descriptive and confirmatory methods in the validation and analysis of quality of life (QOL) data. An outline of MDS as a statistical technique is given, and its application in the context of QOL research is described. The use of MDS is then illustrated in an example based on a study of 300 cancer survivors who completed the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) and the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30). The correlational structure of the two widely used QOL instruments is investigated by means of MDS, and differences between the two questionnaires are elaborated. Finally, the merits and drawbacks of MDS are discussed in the specific context of the example and in the general framework of QOL research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. 2nd edn., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
Fayers PM, Hand DJ. Factor analysis, causal indicators and quality of life. Qual Life Res 1997; 6: 139-150.
Skevington SM, Bradshaw J, Saxena S. Selecting national items for the WHOQOL: Conceptual and psychometric considerations. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 473-487.
Ringdal K, Ringdal GI, Kaasa S, et al. Assessing the consistency of psychometric properties of the HRQoL scales within the EORTC QLQ-C30 across populations by means of the Mokken scaling model. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 25-43.
Wagner AK, Wyss K, Gandek B, Kilima PM, Lorenz S, Whiting D. A Kiswahili version of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Tanzania: Translation and tests of scaling assumptions. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 101-110.
Prieto L, Santed R, Cobo E, Alonso J. A new measure for assessing the health-related quality of life of patients with vertigo, dizziness or imbalance. Qual Life Res 1999;: 131-139.
Revicki DA, Sorensen S, Wu AW. Reliability and validity of physical and mental health summary scores from the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey. Med Care 1998; 36: 126-137.
Van der Linden WJ, Hambleton RK. Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. New York: Springer, 1997.
Chatfield C, Collins AJ. Introduction to Multivariate Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall, 1980.
Dillon WR, Goldstein M. Multivariate Analysis. Methods and Applications. New York: Wiley, 1984.
Torgerson WS. Multidimensional scaling. I. Theory and method. Psychometrika 1952; 17: 401-419.
Andrews FM, Withey SB. Social Indicators of Well-being. New York: Plenum Press, 1976.
Tüchler H, Hofmann S, Bernhart M, et al. A short multilingual quality of life questionnaire-practicability, reliability and interlingual homogeneity. Qual Life Res 1992; 1: 107-117.
Pukrop R, Möller HJ, Steinmeyer EM. Quality of life in psychiatry: A systematic contribution to construct validation and the development of the integrative assessment tool ‘modular system for quality of life.’ Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000; 70: 41-53.
Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 570-579.
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Nat Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 364-376.
Everitt BS, Rabe-Hesketh S. The Analysis of Proximity Data. London: Arnold, 1997.
Kruskal JB, Wish M. Multidimensional Scaling. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1978.
Kruskal JB. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness-of-fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 1964; 29: 28-42.
Shye S. (ed) Theory Construction and Data analysis in the Behavioral Sciences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1978.
Borg I, Lingoes J. Multidimensional Similarity Structure Analysis. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1987.
Kemmler G, Holzner B, Kopp M, et al. Comparison of two quality of life instruments for cancer patients: The functional assessment of cancer therapy-general and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire-C30. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2932-2940.
Kopp M, Schweigkofler H, Holzner B, et al. EORTC QLQC30 and FACT-BMT for the measurement of quality of life in bone marrow transplant recipients: A comparison. Eur J Haematol 2000; 65: 87-103.
Aaronson NK, Cull AM, Kaasa S, Sprangers MAG. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) modular appraoch to quality of life assessment in oncology: an update. In: Spilker B (ed), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd edn., Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996.
Bonomi AE, Cella DF, Hahn EA, et al. Multilingual translation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 309-320.
Hahn EA, Holzner B, Kemmler G, Sperner-Unterweger B, Cella D. Using Rasch measurement to improve cross-cultural equivalence of quality of life instruments. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 601.
Lent L, Hahn E, Eremenco S, Webster K, Cella D. Using cross-cultural input to adapt the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT) scales. Acta Oncol 1999; 38: 695-702.
McLachlan SA, Devins GM, Goodwin PJ. Factor analysis of the psychosocial items of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in metastatic breast cancer patients participating in a psychosocial intervention study. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 311-317.
Ramsay JO. Some statistical approaches to multidimensional scaling data. J R Stat Soc, Series A 1982; 145: 285-312.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kemmler, G., Holzner, B., Kopp, M. et al. Multidimensional scaling as a tool for analysing quality of life data. Qual Life Res 11, 223–233 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015207400490
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015207400490