Skip to main content
Log in

Multidimensional scaling as a tool for analysing quality of life data

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multidimensional scaling (MDS) is introduced and discussed as a graphical method to complement conventional descriptive and confirmatory methods in the validation and analysis of quality of life (QOL) data. An outline of MDS as a statistical technique is given, and its application in the context of QOL research is described. The use of MDS is then illustrated in an example based on a study of 300 cancer survivors who completed the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) and the EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30). The correlational structure of the two widely used QOL instruments is investigated by means of MDS, and differences between the two questionnaires are elaborated. Finally, the merits and drawbacks of MDS are discussed in the specific context of the example and in the general framework of QOL research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. 2nd edn., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fayers PM, Hand DJ. Factor analysis, causal indicators and quality of life. Qual Life Res 1997; 6: 139-150.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Skevington SM, Bradshaw J, Saxena S. Selecting national items for the WHOQOL: Conceptual and psychometric considerations. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 473-487.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ringdal K, Ringdal GI, Kaasa S, et al. Assessing the consistency of psychometric properties of the HRQoL scales within the EORTC QLQ-C30 across populations by means of the Mokken scaling model. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 25-43.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner AK, Wyss K, Gandek B, Kilima PM, Lorenz S, Whiting D. A Kiswahili version of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Tanzania: Translation and tests of scaling assumptions. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 101-110.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Prieto L, Santed R, Cobo E, Alonso J. A new measure for assessing the health-related quality of life of patients with vertigo, dizziness or imbalance. Qual Life Res 1999;: 131-139.

  7. Revicki DA, Sorensen S, Wu AW. Reliability and validity of physical and mental health summary scores from the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey. Med Care 1998; 36: 126-137.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Van der Linden WJ, Hambleton RK. Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. New York: Springer, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chatfield C, Collins AJ. Introduction to Multivariate Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dillon WR, Goldstein M. Multivariate Analysis. Methods and Applications. New York: Wiley, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Torgerson WS. Multidimensional scaling. I. Theory and method. Psychometrika 1952; 17: 401-419.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Andrews FM, Withey SB. Social Indicators of Well-being. New York: Plenum Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tüchler H, Hofmann S, Bernhart M, et al. A short multilingual quality of life questionnaire-practicability, reliability and interlingual homogeneity. Qual Life Res 1992; 1: 107-117.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pukrop R, Möller HJ, Steinmeyer EM. Quality of life in psychiatry: A systematic contribution to construct validation and the development of the integrative assessment tool ‘modular system for quality of life.’ Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000; 70: 41-53.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 570-579.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Nat Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 364-376.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Everitt BS, Rabe-Hesketh S. The Analysis of Proximity Data. London: Arnold, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kruskal JB, Wish M. Multidimensional Scaling. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kruskal JB. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness-of-fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 1964; 29: 28-42.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shye S. (ed) Theory Construction and Data analysis in the Behavioral Sciences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Borg I, Lingoes J. Multidimensional Similarity Structure Analysis. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kemmler G, Holzner B, Kopp M, et al. Comparison of two quality of life instruments for cancer patients: The functional assessment of cancer therapy-general and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire-C30. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 2932-2940.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kopp M, Schweigkofler H, Holzner B, et al. EORTC QLQC30 and FACT-BMT for the measurement of quality of life in bone marrow transplant recipients: A comparison. Eur J Haematol 2000; 65: 87-103.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aaronson NK, Cull AM, Kaasa S, Sprangers MAG. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) modular appraoch to quality of life assessment in oncology: an update. In: Spilker B (ed), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd edn., Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bonomi AE, Cella DF, Hahn EA, et al. Multilingual translation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 309-320.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hahn EA, Holzner B, Kemmler G, Sperner-Unterweger B, Cella D. Using Rasch measurement to improve cross-cultural equivalence of quality of life instruments. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 601.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lent L, Hahn E, Eremenco S, Webster K, Cella D. Using cross-cultural input to adapt the functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT) scales. Acta Oncol 1999; 38: 695-702.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McLachlan SA, Devins GM, Goodwin PJ. Factor analysis of the psychosocial items of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in metastatic breast cancer patients participating in a psychosocial intervention study. Qual Life Res 1999; 8: 311-317.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ramsay JO. Some statistical approaches to multidimensional scaling data. J R Stat Soc, Series A 1982; 145: 285-312.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Kemmler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kemmler, G., Holzner, B., Kopp, M. et al. Multidimensional scaling as a tool for analysing quality of life data. Qual Life Res 11, 223–233 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015207400490

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015207400490

Navigation