Skip to main content
Log in

The Angina-related Limitations at Work Questionnaire

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This report describes initial experience with a new self-report questionnaire, the 17 item Angina-related Limitations at Work Questionnaire. Forty employed individuals with chronic stable angina pectoris completed the questionnaire which retrospectively examined the subjects' difficulty in performing specific work activities during the preceding 4 week period. The questionnaire performed well in this study and there was initial evidence of its validity and reliability. More than one-half of the respondents (52.5%) indicated at least some difficulty in performing one or more of the 17 work items due to angina during the preceding 4 weeks, with the greatest difficulty experienced in physically exerting tasks, handling stressful situations and feeling a sense of accomplishment. In contrast, only one-quarter of the sample missed any work time. In tests of convergent validity, the degree of work limitation correlated significantly with SF-36 physical and mental health component scores and with self-reports of angina symptoms. The questionnaire had internal reliability, with item to total score correlations of 0.75 or higher for 14 of the 17 items. In summary, the Angina-related Limitations at Work Questionnaire offers promise for quantifying work limitations among individuals with chronic stable angina.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffman C, Rice D, Sung H-Y. Persons with chronic conditions: their prevalence and costs. JAMA 1996; 276: 1473–1479

    Google Scholar 

  2. Patrick DL, Erickson P. Health Status and Health Policy: Allocating Resources to Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993: 76–78.

    Google Scholar 

  3. LaPlante MP, Carlson D. Disability in the United States: Prevalence and Causes, 1992. Disability Statistics Report (7). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Heart Association. Heart and Stroke Facts: 1996, Statistical Supplement. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association National Center, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wenger N, Furberg CD. Cardiovascular disorders. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life Assessment in Clinical Trials. New York: Raven Press Ltd, 1990: 335–345.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feinstein AR, Wells CK. A new clinical taxonomy for rating change in functional activities of patients with angina pectoris. Am Heart J 1977; 93(2): 172–182.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goldman L, Hashimoto B, Cook F, Loscalzo A. Comparative reproducibility and validity of systems for assessing cardiovascular functional class: advantages of a new specific activity scale. Circulation 1981; 64: 1227–1234.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dennis C, Goins P, DeBusk RF. Conspectus: working after heart attack. Comp Ther 1989; 15(11): 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dimsdale JE, Hackett TP, Hutter AM, Jr, Block PC. The association of clinical, psychosocial, and angiographic variables with work status in patients with coronary artery disease. J Psychosomat Res. 1982; 26: 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Misra KK, Kazanchi BN, Davies GJ et al. Determinants of work capability and employment after coronary artery surgery. Eur Heart J. 1985; 6: 176–180.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mark DB, Lam LC, Lee KL et al. Effects of coronary angio-plasty, coronary bypass surgery, and medical therapy on employment in patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120(2): 111–117.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 333–341.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ware JE, Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bush JW. General health policy model: Quality of Well-being Scale (QWB). In: Wenger N, Mattson ME, Furberg CD, Elinson J, eds. Assessment of Quality of Life in Cardiovascular Therapies. LeJacq, 1984: 189–199.

  15. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981; 19(8): 787–805.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lerner DJ, Bungay KM. Measuring work outcomes. In: Bungay KM, Osterhaus JT, Paladino JA, Sanchez LA, eds. Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes: Applications for Patient Care. Module 3: Assessment of Humanistic Outcomes. Kansas City, MO: American College of Clinical Pharmacy, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rose GA. Ischemic heart disease: Chest Pain Questionnaire. Milbank Mem Fund Quart 1965; 43: 32–39.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha in internal structure tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16 297–334.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979; 86: 420.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Burgess AW, Lerner DJ, D'Agostino RB et al. A randomized control trial of cardiac rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med 1987; 24:359–370.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lerner, D.J., Amick, B.C., Malspeis, S. et al. The Angina-related Limitations at Work Questionnaire. Qual Life Res 7, 23–32 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008880704343

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008880704343

Navigation