Abstract
A primary goal of the foster care system is to reunite foster children with their biological parents. Keeping foster children connected to their biological parents, through visiting and other forms of contact, is essential for reunification because it helps to reestablish and maintain family ties during out-of-home placement. Parent-child contact can also increase the child's well-being while in care. Although foster parents are expected to help foster children stay connected to their biological parents, their actual involvement in this process remains problematic. This study tests the hypothesis that agencies can promote foster parent involvement in the parent-child connection by providing foster parents with specialized training and ongoing support. The findings support the notion that training and support increases the involvement of foster parents in parent-child contact.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cantos, A.L., L.T. Gries, & V. Slis. (1997). Behavioral correlates of parental visiting during family foster care. Child Welfare, 76, 309–329.
Davis, I.P., & E. Ellis-MacLeod. (1994). Temporary foster care: Separating and reunifying families. In J. Blacher (Ed.), When there's no place like home: Options for children living apart from their natural families (pp. 123–161). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.
Davis, I.P., J. Landsverk, R. Newton, & W. Ganger. (1996). Parental visiting and foster care reunification. Children and Youth Services Review, 18, 363–382.
Fanshel, D., & E.B. Shinn. (1978). Children in foster care: A longitudinal investigation. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hardy, M.A. (1993). Regression with dummy variables. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Hess, P.M. (1987). Parental visiting of children in foster care: Current knowledge and research agenda. Children and Youth Services Review, 9, 29–50.
Hess, P. (1988). Case and context: Determinants of planned visit frequency in foster family care. Child Welfare, 67, 311–326.
Hess. P.M., & K.O. Proch. (1988). Family visiting in out-of-home care: A guide to practice. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
Hess, P.M., & K. Proch. (1993). Visiting: The heart of reunification. In B.A. Pine, R. Warsh, & A. N. Maluccio (Eds.), Together again: Family reunification in foster care (pp. 119–139). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
Kadushin, A., & J.A. Martin. (1988). Child welfare services. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Lawder, E.A., J.E. Poulin, & R.G. Andrews. (1986). A study of 185 foster children 5 years after placement. Child Welfare, 65, 241–251.
Lee, J.A.B., & D. Nisivoccia. (1989). Walk a mile in my shoes. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
Maluccio, A.N., R. Warsh, & B.A. Pine (1993). Family reunification: An overview. In B.A. Pine, R. Warsh, & A.N. Maluccio (Eds.), Together again: Family reunification in foster care (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
Mech, E.V. (1985). Parental visiting and foster placement. Child Welfare, 64, 67–72.
Milner, J.L. (1987). An ecological perspective on duration of foster care. Child Welfare, 66, 113–123.
Oyserman, D., & R. Benbenishty. (1992). Keeping in touch: Ecological factors related to foster care visitation. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 9, 541–554.
Palmer, S.E. (1995). Maintaining family ties: Inclusive practice in foster care. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
Pasztor, E.M., & S.F. Wynne. (1995). Foster parent retention and recruitment: The state of the art in practice and policy. Washington, D.C: Child Welfare League of America.
Pecora, P.J., J.K. Whittaker, & A.N. Maluccio. (1992). The child welfare challenge: Policy, practice, and research. New York: Aldine DeGruyter.
Ryan, P., E.J. McFadden, & B.L. Warren. (1981). Foster families: A resource for helping parents. In A.N. Maluccio, & P.A. Sinanoglu (Eds.), The challenge of partnership: Working with parents of children in foster care (pp. 189–199). New York: Child Welfare League of America.
Seaberg, J.R. (1981). Foster parents as aides to parents. In A.N. Maluccio, & P.A. Sinanoglu (Eds.), The challenge of partnership: Working with parents of children in foster care (pp. 209–220). New York: Child Welfare League of America.
Sherman, E.A., R. Neuman, & A.W. Shyne. (1993). Children adrift in foster care: A study of alternative approaches. New York: Child Welfare League of America.
Simms, M.D., & B.J. Bolden. (1991). The family reunification project: Facilitating regular contact among foster children, biological families, and foster families. Child Welfare, 70, 679–690.
Steinhauer, P.D. (1991). The least detrimental alternative: A systematic guide to case planning and decision making for children in care. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Tucker, D.J., & L.F. Hurl. (1992). An ecological study of the dynamics of foster home entries. Social Service Review, 66, 617–641.
Warsh, R., B.A. Pine, & A.N. Maluccio. (1996). Reconnecting families: A guide to strengthening family reunification services. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
Weisz, V.G. (1994). Consequences of placement for children who are abused. In J. Blacher (Ed.), When there's no place like home: Options for children living apart from their natural families (pp. 63–100). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.
White, M., E. Albers, & C. Bitonti. (1996). Factors in length of foster care: Worker activities and parent-child visitation. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 23, 75–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanchirico, A., Jablonka, K. Keeping Foster Children Connected to Their Biological Parents: The Impact of Foster Parent Training and Support. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 17, 185–203 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007583813448
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007583813448