Skip to main content
Log in

Variables Associated with Resilience in Divorced Families

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study focuses on the salutogenicproperties of post-divorce families andattempts to identify factors that promoteresilience and family well-being. Within thesalutogenic paradigm the focus is on positivecharacteristics and strengths that contributetowards the growth and development of a system.Family coherence is used as an indication ofthe level of recovery after the crisis, and isused as the dependent measure with regard tothe present well-being of the family. Across-sectional survey research design wasused. The 98 participating families wereidentified on the grounds of the nature of thecrisis (divorce) and the developmental phase ofthe family. An open-ended question and thefollowing self-report questionnaires werecompleted by the parent and a child: abiographical questionnaire, the Relative andFriend Support Index, the Social Support Index,Family Crises Oriented Personal EvaluationScales, Family Sense of Coherence Scale, andthe Family Hardiness Index. Results show thatintra-family support, support of the extendedfamily, support of friends, religion, opencommunication amongst family members, and workand financial security were factors promotingresilience in these families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, K.H.: 1998, ‘The relationship between family sense of coherence and family quality of life after illness diagnosis',, in H.I. McCubbin and T. Elizabeth (eds.), Stress, Coping, and Health in Families: Sense of Coherence and Resiliency (Sage Publications, New York), pp. 169-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky, A.: 1987, ‘The salutogenic perspective: Toward a new view of health and illness', Advances 4(1), pp. 47-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovsky, A. and T. Sourani: 1988, ‘Family sense of coherence and adaptation', Journal of Marriage and the Family 50, pp. 79-92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C.P.: 1994, ‘Resiliency: A shift in our perception?’ American Journal of Family Therapy 22, pp. 135-144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batchelder, M.L.: 1995, ‘Adolescent's adaptation to structural changes in family relationships with parental divorce: A combinatorial model', in T.A. Kindermann and J. Valsiner (eds.), Development of Person-context Relations (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale), pp. 165-203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drapeau, S., C. Samson and M. Saint-Jaques: 1999, ‘The coping process among children of separated parents', Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 31(1/2), pp. 15-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duran-Aydintug, C.: 1998, ‘Emotional support during separation: Its sources and determinants', Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 29(3/4), pp. 121-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, D.M. and M.T. Lynskey: 1996, ‘Adolescent resiliency to family adversity', Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 37, pp. 281-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, V., N. Kalter and J. Hansell: 1993, ‘Divorced women: Factors contributing to resiliency and vulnerability', Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 21(1/2), pp. 21-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Rouse, K.A., M. Longo and M. Trickett: 2000, Fostering resilience in children: Fostering resilience. Removed from the World Wide Web on 9 October 2001: http://content.ag.ohiostate.edu/ohioline/b875/b8755.html

  • Hanson, T.L., S.S. McLanahan and E. Thomson: 1998, ‘Widows on divorce: Before and after', Social Science Research 27, pp. 329-349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, D.R.: 2000, ‘Clinical implications of family resilience', The American Journal of Family Therapy 28(2), pp. 101-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, D.R. and L. De Haan: 1996, ‘Toward a definition of family resilience: Integrating life span and family Perspectives', Family Process 35, pp. 283-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linker, J.S., A.L. Stolberg and R.G. Green: 1999, ‘Family communication as a mediator of child adjustment to divorce', Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 30(1/2), pp. 83-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, H.I., A. Larsen and D.H. Olson: 1982, ‘F-COPES', in D.H. Olson, H.I. McCubbin, H. Barnes, A. Larsen, M. Muxen and M. Wilson (eds.), Family Inventories (University of Minnesota, St Paul), pp. 143-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, H. and M. McCubbin: 1993, ‘Typologies of resilient families: Emerging roles of social class and ethnicity', Family Relations 37, pp. 247-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, H., M. McCubbin and E.A. Thompson: 1996, ‘Resiliency in ethnic families: A conceptual model for predicting family adjustment and adaptation', in H.I. McCubbin, M.A. McCubbin, A.I. Thompson and J.E. Fromer (eds.), Resiliency in Ethnic Minority Families: Native and Immigrant American Families (University of Wisconsin Press, Madison WI), pp. 3-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, H.I. and J.M. Patterson: 1983, ‘The family stress process: The double ABCX model of adjustment and adaptation', in H.I. McCubbin, M. Sussman and J. Patterson (eds.), Social Stress and Family: Advances and Development in Family Stress Theory and Research (The Haworth Press, New York), pp. 7-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKerny, P.C. and S.J. Price: 1994, Families and Change: Coping with Stressful Events (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mederer, H.J.: 1998, ‘Surviving the demise of a way of life: Stress and resilience in North-eastern commercial fishing families', in H.I. McCubbin, E.A. Thompson, A.I. Thompson and J. Furtell (eds.), The Dynamics of Resilient Gamilies (Sage Publications, London), pp. 204-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D.H., H.I. McCubbin, H. Barnes, A. Larsen, M. Muxen and M. Wilson: 1985, Family Inventories: Inventories Used in a National Survey of Families across the Family Life Cycle, 2nd ed. (University of Minnesota, St. Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, S.D. and P.P. Heppner: 1993, ‘Examination of coping resources and family adaptation in mothers and daughters of incestuous versus nonclinical families', Journal of Counselling Psychology 40(1), pp. 100-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M.: 1987, ‘Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms', American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 57, pp. 316-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagy, S. and A. Antonovsky: 1998, ‘The development of the sense of coherence:A retrospective study of early life experiences in the family', International Journal of Ageing and Human Development 51(2), pp. 155-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.: 1999, ‘Resilience concept and findings: Implications for family therapy', Journal of Family Therapy 21, pp. 154-158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strümpfer, D.J.W.: 1995, Psychosocial resilience in adults. International Person-Centered Approach Forum, 6 July 1998.

  • Thompson, C.L. and L.B. Rudolph: 2000, Counselling Children (Brooks/Cole, Belmont).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, F.: 1998, Beliefs, Spirituality, and Transcendence: Keys to Family Resilience (Guilford Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. and R.S. Smith: 1993, Vulnerable but Invincible: A Study of Resilient Children (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, M.F.: 1998, ‘The parental alliance following divorce: An overview', Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 24(1), pp. 3-24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greeff, A.P., van der Merwe, S. Variables Associated with Resilience in Divorced Families. Social Indicators Research 68, 59–75 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000025569.95499.b5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000025569.95499.b5

Keywords

Navigation