Skip to main content
Log in

Subjective Well-Being and Household Factors in South Africa

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses a household surveyfrom South Africa to estimate a model ofsubjective well-being based upon poverty andhousehold characteristics including housing,sanitation, and transportation. Following Sen,we allow for factors in addition to income andwe begin to incorporate functionings andcapabilities as determinants of well-being. This study finds that important differencesexist among groups based upon their economicstatus. For the poorest quartilestransportation and housing play the mostimportant role in determining well-being, whilefor the richest quartiles, sanitation, water,energy, education and health are relativelymore important. These results have importantpublic policy implications because many of thefactors affecting well-being have large publicgood components. In addition, these resultscould be used to help governments focus aid inorder to improve well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Allardt, E.: 1981, 'Experiences from the comparative Scandinavian welfare study, with a bibliography of the project', European Journal of Political Research 9, pp. 101-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T.: 1981, 'Qualitative response models: A survey', Journal of Economic Literature 19, pp. 1483-1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T.: 1985, Advanced Econometrics (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R. and H. Uusitalo: 1987, 'The Scandinavian approach to welfare research', in R. Erikson, E. Hansen, S. Ringen and H. Uusitalo (eds.), The Scandinavian Model, Welfare States, and Welfare Research (ME Sharpe: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H.: 2000, Econometric Analysis (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasen, S.: 1997, 'Poverty, inequality and deprivation in South Africa: An analysis of the 1993 SALDRU survey', Social Indicators Research 41, pp. 51-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasen, S.: 2000, 'Measuring poverty and deprivation in South Africa', Review of Income and Wealth 46(1), pp. 33-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, J., M. Carter and D. Posel: 1995, 'The composition and persistence of rural poverty in South Africa', Land and Agriculture Policy Centre Working Paper 15 (LAPC, Johannesburg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller, V. and W. Saris: 2001, 'The relationship between subjective well-being and domain satisfactions in South Africa,’ Social Indicators Research 55, pp. 97-114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.: 1988, 'The concept of development', in H. Chenery and T. N. Srinivasan (eds.), Handbook of Development Economics, Volume I (Elsevier Science Publisher).

  • Sen, A.: 1992, Inequality Examined (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.: 2000, Development as Freedom (Anchor Books: New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, T. N.: 1994, 'Human development: A new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel', American Economic Review 84(3), pp. 238-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R.: 1993, 'Welfare, resources and capabilities: A review of inequality reexamined by Amartya Sen', Journal of Economic Literature 31(4), pp. 1947-1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bookwalter, J.T., Dalenberg, D. Subjective Well-Being and Household Factors in South Africa. Social Indicators Research 65, 333–353 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003546.96008.58

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003546.96008.58

Keywords

Navigation