Abstract
Two studies were designed to investigate the current and possible academic self-views of university and high school students. In the first study, upper level university students were shown to diverge by gender in their current- and possible-self-views. Women reported more ability for and identification with the arts, communication, and social sciences; men reported more ability for and identification with mathematics, science, technology, and business. Gender differences were greater with respect to possible future selves than to current selves. The second study included lower and upper level university students as well as high school students. Again, a gender divergence appeared among the university students; however, it was not as marked among high school students. Analyses showed that both women and men differed significantly across educational levels in their self-ratings and that, within the masculine-stereotyped academic domains linked to powerful careers, university women endorsed fewer possibilities for themselves that high school women did. These findings suggest that, as they make the transition from high school to university, young women may be actively closing off possibilities for their futures.
Similar content being viewed by others
references
Adamuti-Trache, M., & Andres, L. (2002). Issues of retention of B.C. young women through the science and engineering pipeline. In Women in a knowledge-based society: Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Women in Engineering and Science, Paper #245. CD-ROM available from the International Network of Women in Engineering and Science, at http://www.inwes.org/
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Brown, J. D. (1998). The self. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Cross, S. E. (2001). Training the scientists and engineers of tomorrow: A person-situation approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 296-323.
Cross, S. E., & Vick, N. V. (2001). The interdependent self-construal and social support: The case of persistence in engineering. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 820-832.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eccles, J. (1987). Gender roles and women's achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135-172.
Fitzgerald, L. F., & Harmon, L. W. (2001). Women's career development: A postmodern update. In F. T. L. Leong & A. Barak (Eds.). Contemporary models in vocational psychology (pp. 207-230). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gaudet, J., & Lapointe, C. (2002). Girls and science: An untimely missed rendezvous. In Women in a knowledge-based society: Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Women in Engineering and Science, Paper #41. CD-ROM available from the International Network of Women in Engineering and Science, at http://www.inwes.org/
Hackett, G. (1985). Role of mathematics self-efficacy in the choice of math-related majors of college women and men: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 47-56.
Hartman, H., & Hartman, M. (2002). Comparing female and male experiences in the Rowan undergraduate engineering program. In Women in a knowledge-based society: Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Women in Engineering and Science, Paper #220. CD-ROM available from the International Network of Women in Engineering and Science, at http://www.inwes.org/
Ivie, R., & Stowe, K. (2002). U.S. women in academic physics. In Women in a knowledge-based society: Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Women in Engineering and Science, Paper #169. CD-ROM available from the International Network of Women in Engineering and Science, at http://www.inwes.org/
Lips, H. M. (1993). Bifurcation of a common path: Gender splitting on the road to engineering and physical science careers. Initiatives, 55(3), 13-22.
Lips, H. M. (1995). Through the lens of mathematical/scientific self-schemas: Images of students' current and possible selves. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1671-1699.
Lips, H. M. (1996, August). Linking students' current and possible selves to teaching and learning in academic domains. Paper presented at the XXVI International Congress of Psychology, Montreal, Canada.
Lips, H. M. (1998, June). Gendered possibilities: Young women's and men's visions of their future power and competence. Invited plenary address, Canadian Psychological Association convention, Edmonton, Canada.
Lips, H. M., & Casey, J. F., III (1996, March). Fuzzy effects in scales assessing self-schemas and possible selves. Paper presented at the annual convention of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Norfolk, VA.
Lips, H. M., & Wilson, L. A. (1997, October). What is possible for me? Gender and academic self-concept among university students. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Southern Regional Chapter of the Association for Women in Psychology, Wilmington, NC.
Lockwood, P., & Kunda, Z. (1997). Superstars and me: Predicting the impact of role models on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 91-103.
Mahoney, M. J., & Lyddon, W. J. (1988). Recent developments in cognitive approaches to counseling and psychotherapy. Counseling Psychologist, 16, 190-234.
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
Marx, D. M., & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women's math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1183-1193.
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math [not equal to] me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44-59.
Norusis, M. J. (1985). SPSS X Advanced Statistics Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ornstein, N. J., Mann, T. E., Malbin, M. J., & Bibby, R. E. (1993). Vital statistics of Congress, 1993. Washington, DC: American Institute for Policy Research.
Räty, H., Vänskä, J., Kasanen, K., & Kärkkäinen, R. (2002). Parents' explanations of their child's performance in mathematics and reading: A replication. Sex Roles, 46, 121-128.
Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schoon, I. (2001). Teenage job aspirations and career attainment in adulthood: A 17-year follow-up study of teenagers who aspired to become scientists, health professionals, or engineers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 124-132.
Steele, J., James, J. B., & Barnett, R. C. (2002). Learning in a man's world: Examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in male-dominated academic areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 46-50.
The corporate elite: Portrait of a CEO. (1993, October 11). Business Week, 64-70, 82–101.
Zeldin, A. L., & Pajares, F. (2000). Against the odds: Self-efficacy beliefs of women in mathematical, scientific, and technological careers. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 215-246.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lips, H.M. The Gender Gap in Possible Selves: Divergence of Academic Self-Views Among High School and University Students. Sex Roles 50, 357–371 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000018891.88889.c9
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000018891.88889.c9