Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attitudes and Dating Aggression: A Cognitive Dissonance Approach

  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the association between attitudes about dating aggression and select dating aggressive behaviors (verbal aggression and jealous behavior) in high school students. Our hypothesis, derived from cognitive dissonance theory, was that discrepancies between self-reported attitudes and aggressive behavior at Time 1 (i.e., putative cognitive dissonance) would predict decreases in aggression between Time 1 and Time 2 beyond what would be predicted by change in attitudes over the same period. Results indicated that cognitive dissonance (as indexed by the discrepancy between attitudes and behavior) was generally a significant predictor of behavior change, providing significant improvement in prediction of behavior over attitude change alone. We discuss the implications of these findings for prevention efforts and directions for future research in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relationship: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 888-918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias, I., Samios, M. & O'Leary, K. D. (1987). Prevalence and correlates of physical aggression during courtship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 82-90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E. (1999). Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. In E. Harmon-Jones, & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 103-126). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery-Leaf, S., Cascardi, M., O'Leary, K. D., & Cano, A. (1997). Efficacy of a dating violence prevention program on attitudes justifying aggression. Journal of Adolescent Health, 21, 11-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, L. (1992). Dating violence among high school students. Social Work, 37, 21-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookwala, J., Frieze, I. H., Smith, C., & Ryan, K. (1992). Predictors of dating violence: A multivariate analysis. Violence and Victims, 7, 297-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, C. F., Riggs, D. S., O'Leary, K. D., & Arias, I. (1990). Family precursors: Expected and actual consequences of dating aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 5, 247-258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burcky, W., Reuterman, N., & Kopsky, S. (1988). Dating violence among high school students. School Counselor, 35, 353-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, E. S., & Eno, R. J. (1991). Predicting men's sexual coercion and aggression from attitudes, dating history, and sexual response. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 4, 55-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cano, A., Avery-Leaf, S., Cascardi, M., & O'Leary, K. D. (1998). Dating Violence in Two High School Samples: Discriminating Variables. Journal of Primary Prevention, 18, 431-446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascardi, M., Langhinrichsen, J., & Vivian, D. (1992). Marital aggression: Impact, injury, and health correlates for husbands and wives. Archives of Internal Medicine, 152, 1178-1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascardi, M., Avery-Leaf, S., O'Leary, K. D., & Slep, A. M. S. (1999). Factor structure and convergent validity of the Conflict Tactics Scale in high school students. Psychological Assessment, 11, 546-555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. (1999). Unwanted consequences and the self: In search of the motivation for dissonance reduction. In E. Harmon-Jones, & J. Mills (Eds.). Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 149-173). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, C., Thibodeau, R., Arsonson, E., & Miller, D. (1992). Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 841-854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foo, L., & Margolin, G. (1996). Amultivariate investigation of dating aggression. Journal of Family Violence, 10, 351-377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Arriaga, X. B., Helms, R., Koch, G. G., & Linder, G. F. (1998). An evaluation of Safe Dates, and adolescent dating violence prevention program. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 45-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foshee, V. A., Bauman, K. E., Greene, W. F., Koch, G. G., Linder, G. F., & MacDougal, J. E. (2000). The Safe Dates Program: 1-year follow-up results. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1619-1622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foshee, V. A., Linder, G. F., Bauman, K. E., Langwick, S. A., Arriaga, X. B., Heath, J. L., McMahon, P. M., & Bangdiwala, S. (1996). The Safe Dates Project: Theoretical basis, evaluation design, and selected baseline findings. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 12(Suppl.), 39-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henton, J. M., Cate, R. M., Koval, J., Lloyd, S., & Christopher, F. S. (1983). Romance and violence in dating relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 4, 467-482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, P. G., Sudermann, M., Reitzel, D., & Killip, S. M. (1992). An evaluation of a secondary school primary prevention program on violence in intimate relationships. Violence and Victims, 7, 129-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasian, M., & Painter, S. L. (1992). Frequency and severity of psychological abuse in a dating population. Journal of Interper-sonal Violence, 7, 350-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, D. (2000). School-based interventions to prevent unprotected sex and HIV among adolescents. In J. L. Peterson, & R. J. DiClemente (Eds.), Handbook of HIV prevention (pp. 83-101). New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, K. E., & Gwartney-Gibbs, P. A. (1985). Violence in the context of dating and sex. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 45-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laner, M. R., & Thompson, J. (1982). Abuse and aggression in courting couples. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Jour-nal, 3, 229-244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, F., Vèzina, L., Pichè, C., & Boivin, M. (1995). Evaluation of a prevention program for violence in teen dating relationships.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 516-524.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGowan, M. J. (1997). An evaluation of a dating violence prevention program for middle school students. Violence and Victims, 12, 223-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makepeace, J. M. (1981). Courtship violence among college students. Family Relations, 30, 97-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Mental Health [NIMH] (2000). Translating behavioral science into action: Report of the National Advisory Mental Health Council Behavioral Science Workgroup (NIH Publication No. 00-4699).

  • O'Brien, M. K., Cascardi, M., & Avery-Leaf, S. (July, 1999). Dis-criminating variables of dating violence in a middle school sample. Paper presented in Symposium (S. Avery-Leaf), "The BRIGHT program: An evaluation of a dating violence pre-vention curriculum in an urban middle school setting" at the 6th International Family Violence Conference, Durham, NH.

  • O'Keefe, M. (1997). Predictors of dating violence among high school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 546-568.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Keefe, N. K., Brockopp, K., & Chew, E. (1986). Teen dating vio-lence. Social Work, 31, 465-468.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K. D., Barling, J., Arias, I., Rosenbaum, A., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1989). Prevalence and stability of physical ag-gression between spouses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 263-268.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, K. D., & Slep, A. M. S. (2003). A dyadic model of adoles-cent dating aggression. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psy-chology. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 314-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paglia, A., & Room, R. (1999). Preventing substance use problems among youth: Aliterature review and recommendations. Jour-nal of Primary Prevention, 20, 3-50

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, P., & Thomas, C. D. (1992). Prevalence and cor-relates of dating violence in a Canadian university sam-ple. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 24, 490-501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, E. L., & Byers, E. S. (1999). The Attitudes Towards Dating Violence Scales: Development and initial validation. Journal of Family Violence, 14, 351-375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitzel-Jaffe, D., & Wolfe, D. A. (2001). Predictors of relationship abuse among young men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 99-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuterman, N. A., & Burcky, W. D. (1989). Dating violence in high school: A profile of the victims. Psychology, 26, 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. S. (1993). Relationship problems and dating aggression: A potential treatment target. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 18-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. S., & O'Leary, K. D. (1996). Aggression between het-erosexual dating partners: An examination of a causal model of courtship aggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 519-540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, B., & Callahan, J. E. (1983). Adolescent's self report of violence in families and dating relationships. Adolescence, 10, 545-553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, B., & Kelsey, T. (1986). Dating violence among high school students. Psychology: AQuarterly Journal of HumanBehavior, 23, 53-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, J. A., Slep, A. M. S., & O'Leary, K. D. (1998, Novem-ber). The context and consequences of female to male dating aggression. Poster presented at the 32nd annual convention of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Washington, D.C.

  • Sigelman, C. K., Berry, C. J., & Wiles, K. A. (1984). Violence in col-lege students' dating relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 530-548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slep, A. M. S., Cascardi, M., Avery-Leaf, S., & O'Leary, K. D. (2001). Two new measures of attitudes accepting of teen dating aggres-sion. Psychological Assessment, 13, 306-318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J., Aronson, E., Crain, A. L., Winslow, M. P., & Fried, C. B. (1994). Inducing hypocrisy as a means of encouraging young adults to use condoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bul-letin, 20, 116-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman, D. B., & Frankel, S. L. (1996). Patriachal ideology and wife-assault: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Vio-lence, 11, 13-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, R. M. (1989). The development of a measure of psycholog-ical maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 159-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. W., & Koss, M. P. (1991). Courtship violence: Incidence in a national sample of higher education students. Violence and Victims, 6, 247-256.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Institute on Addictions, University of Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York

    Julie A. Schumacher

  2. Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York

    Amy M. Smith Slep

Authors
  1. Julie A. Schumacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy M. Smith Slep
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schumacher, J.A., Slep, A.M.S. Attitudes and Dating Aggression: A Cognitive Dissonance Approach. Prev Sci 5, 231–243 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000045357.19100.77

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000045357.19100.77

Search

Navigation