Abstract
Widespread and effective implementation of research-based prevention practices will be facilitated by the explicit adoption of a functional contextualist framework for prevention research. Such a framework has as its central goal predicting and influencing behavior and cultural practices. Research within this framework is evaluated in terms of its ability to contribute to that goal. As a result, it contributes directly to the ultimate goals of prevention science—affecting the incidence and prevalence of problems in populations. The approach contrasts with the mechanist framework, which is implicit in much behavioral science research. The mechanist framework has as its truth criterion the predictive verification of models of the interrelationships among variables. Such models can—but need not—identify manipulable variables that can be exploited to affect problems of interest. Such models require the inclusion of multiple cases for testing and this requirement may impede the tendency of scientists to work with a single school or community. Functional contextualism is suited to the study of the individual case. It provides a framework within which researchers can more readily collaborate with practitioners in the development and further evaluation of practices within the settings where practitioners will ultimately use those practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Biglan, A. (1995). Changing Cultural Practices: A Contextualist Framework for Intervention Research, Context, Reno, NV.
Biglan, A. (2003). Selection by consequences: One unifying principle for a transdisciplinary science of prevention. Prevention Science, 4(4), 213-232.
Biglan, A., Ary, D. V., Koehn, V., Levings, D., Smith, S., Wright, Z., James, L., & Henderson, J. (1996). Mobilizing positive reinforcement in communities to reduce youth access to tobacco. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24(5), 625-638.
Biglan, A., Ary, D. V., & Wagenaar, A. C. (2000). The value of interrupted time-series experiments for community intervention research. Prevention Research, 1(1), 31-49.
Biglan, A., Brennan, P. A., Foster, S. L., Holder, H. D., Miller, T. L., Cunningham, P. B., Derzon, J. H., Embry, D. D., Fishbein, D. H., Flay, B., Goeders, N. E., Kelder, S. H., Kenkel, D., Meyer, R., & Zucker, R. A. (2004). Helping Adolescents at Risk: Prevention of Multiple Problem Behaviors, Guilford, New York, NY.
Biglan, A., & Hayes, S. C. (1996). Should the behavioral sciences become more pragmatic? The case for functional contextualism in research on human behavior. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 5(1), 47-57.
Biglan, A., Henderson, J., Humphreys, D., Yasui, M., Whisman, R., Black, C., & James, L. E. (1995). Mobilising positive reinforcement to reduce youth access to tobacco. Tobacco Control, 4, 42-48.
Biglan, A., Mrazek, P., Carnine, D. W., & Flay, B. R. (2003). The integration of research and practice in the prevention of youth problem behaviors. American Psychologist, 58(6/7), 433-440.
Biglan, A., & Smolkowski, K. (2002). The role of the community psychologist in the 21st century. Prevention and Treatment, 5, Article 2, posted January 15, 2002.
Biglan, A., & Taylor, T. K. (2000). Why have we been more successful in reducing tobacco use than violent crime? American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(3), 269-302.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281-302.
Dishion, T. J., & Patterson, G. R. (1992). Age effects in parent training outcome. Behavior Therapy, 23, 719-729.
Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Li, F. (in press). Power analysis models and methods: A Latent variable framework for power estimation and analyses. In W. Bukowski & Z. Sloboda (eds.), Issues in Prevention Research, Plenum, New York, NY.
Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Strycker, L. A., Li, F., & Alpert, A. (1999). An Introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Fawcett, S. B. (1990). Some emerging standards for community research and action: Aid from a behavioral perspective. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (eds.), Researching Community Psychology: Issues of Theory and Methods, APA, Washington, DC.
Flay, B. R., & Petraitis, J. M. (1994). The theory of triadic influence: A new theory of health behavior with implications for preventive interventions. Advances in Medical Sociology, 4, 19-44.
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1322-1327.
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). Unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3-25.
Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64-105.
Hayes, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes (ed.), Behavior Analysis of Language and Cognition Context, Reno, pp. 9-30.
Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior–behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view of the purposes of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9(2), 175-190.
Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., Reese, H. W., & Sarbin, T. R. (1993). Varieties of Scientific Contextualism, Context, Reno.
James, W. (1948). Essays in Pragmatism, Hafner, New York, NJ. (Original work published 1907).
Kelly, J. G. (1986). Context and process: An ecological view of the interdependence of practice and research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(6), 581-589.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, 2, 1-210.
MacCorquodale, K., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychological Review, 55, 95-107.
Menand, L. (2001). The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America, Farrar, New York, NY.
Mrazek, P., Biglan, A., & Hawkins, J. D. (2004). Creating communities that monitor the well being of America's children and adolescents. Manuscript in preparation.
Peirce, C. S. (1905). What pragmatism is. The Monist, 15(2), 161-181.
Pepper, S. C. (1942). World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. UC Press, Berkeley, CA.
Ringwalt, C. L., Ennett, S., Vincus, A., Thorne, J., Rohrbach, L. A., & Simons-Rudolph, A. (2002). The prevalence of effective substance use prevention curricula in U.S. middle schools. Prevention Science, 3(4), 257-265.
Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of Scientific Research, Basic Books, New York, NY.
Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270-277.
Skinner, B. F. (1972). Are theories of learning necessary? Cumulative Record: A Selection of Papers, Appleton Century Crofts, New York, NY, pp. 69-100.
Smith, L. (1986). Behaviorism and Logical Positivism: A Reassessment of Their Alliance, University of California at Stanford, Stanford, CA.
Sugai, G., Horner, R. H., Dunlap, G., Hieneman, M., Lewis, T. J., Nelson, C. M., Scott, T., Liaupsin, C., Sailor, W., Turnbull, A. P., Turnbull, H. R., Wickham, D., Wilcox, B., & Ruef, M. (2000). Applying positive behavior support and functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 2(3), 131-143.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1996). Synar Regulation: Tobacco Outlet Inspection—Guidance, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP), Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biglan, A. Contextualism and the Development of Effective Prevention Practices. Prev Sci 5, 15–21 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000013977.07261.5a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PREV.0000013977.07261.5a