Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the progression of hand osteoarthritis in rural population and to determine the factors which could influence that progression. Participants of both sexes were 54–56 years of age at the first visit. Radiographs of both hands, anthropometry and blood pressure measurement were performed at baseline and than repeated 10 years later. Total number of 286 participants completed the study. Radiographs were red according to Kellgren–Lawrence criteria. Distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints were most frequently affected with osteoarthritis at the baseline and after 10 years. The worst deterioration (three grades) was found in DIP joints in women and in proximal interphalangeal joints in men. Grip strength in men was significantly related with progression of the disease, which allow us to conclude that in our population sample mechanical factors, probably occupational workload, are associated with the more rapid progression of the disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Peyron JG. Epidemiologic and etiologic approach of osteoarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1979; 8: 288–303.
Lawrence JS. Rheumatism in populations. London: W. Helnemann, Medical Books Ltd., 1977; 98–155.
Van Saase JLCM, van Romunde LKJ, Cats A, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer Survey: Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other population. Ann Rheum Dis 1989; 48: 271–280.
Caspi D, Flusser G, Farber I, et al. Clinical, radiologic, demographic, and occupational aspects of hand osteoarthritis in the elderly. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2001; 30: 321–331.
Bagge E, Bjelle A, Eden S, Svanborg A. Osteoarthritis in the elderly: Clinical and radiological findings in 79 and 85 year olds. Ann Rheum Dis 1991; 50: 535–539.
Carman WJ, Sowers M, Hawthorne VM, Weissfeld LA. Obesity as a risk factor for osteoarthritis of the hand and wrist: A prospective study. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 139; 119–129.
Sahlstrom A, Montgomery F. Risk analysis of occupational factors influencing the development of arthrosis of the knee. Eur J Epidemiol 1997; 13: 675–679.
Caspi D, Flusser G, Farber I, et al. Clinical, radiologic, demographic and occupational aspects of hand osteoarthritis in the elderly. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2001; 30: 321–331.
Jones G, Cooley HM, Stankovich JM. A cross sectional study of the association between sex, smoking and other lifestyle factors and osteoarthritis of the hand. J Rheumatol 2002; 29: 1719–1724.
Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Atlas of standard radiographs of arthritis: The epidemiology of chronic rheumatism, Vol. 2. Philadelphia: FA Davis Co, 1963.
Plato CC, Norris AH. Osteoarthritis of the hand: Longitudinal studies. Am J Epidemiol 1979; 110: 740–746.
Sowers M, Zobel D, Weissfeld L, Hawthorne VM, Carman WJ. Progression of osteoarthritis of the hand and metacarpal bone loss: A twenty-year followup of incident cases. Arthritis Rheum 1991; 34: 36–42.
Harris PA, Hart DJ, Dacre JE, Huskisson EC, Spector TD. The progression of radiological hand osteoarthritis over ten years: A clinical follow-up study. Ostearthritis Cartilage 1994; 2: 247–252.
Hochberg MC, LethbridgeCejku M, Scott WW, Plato CC, Tobin JD. Appendicular bone mass and osteoarthritis of the hands in women: Data from the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 1532–1536.
Hochberg MC, LethbridgeCejku M, Scott WW, Plato CC, Tobin JD. Obesity and osteoarthritis of the hands in women. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1993; 1: 129–135.
Chaisson CE, Zhang Y, Sharma L, Kannel W, Felson DT. Grip strength and the risk of developing radiographic hand osteoarthritis: Results from the Framingham study. Arthritis Rheum 1999; 42: 33–38.
Acheson RM, Chan VK, Clement AR. New Haven survey of joint diseases XII. Distribution and symptoms of osteoarthritis in the hands with reference to the handedness. Ann Rheum Dis 1989; 48: 271–280.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cvijetić, S. Osteoarthritis of the Hands in the Rural Population: A Follow-Up Study. Eur J Epidemiol 19, 687–691 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJEP.0000036794.40723.8e
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJEP.0000036794.40723.8e