Abstract
Stereotype threat is a situational experience in which an individual feels vulnerable and pressured by the possibility of confirming or being judged by a stereotype. This threatening experience leads to performance decrements, even among highly skilled individuals. This article chronicles empirically tested mechanisms for how stereotype threat negatively impacts performance outcomes. A review of relevant published investigations illustrate that a number of intuitive mediators have been suggested and tested, often with discouraging results. Thus, one objective of this article is to provide researchers with a comprehensive and straightforward account of such tested mechanisms to assist with future works. Indeed, there is much room for research in this area considering that to date, as measured, no individual mediator has completely explained the stereotype threat–poor performance relationship. As such, the second objective of this article is to propose a multiple mediator approach drawing from achievement goal theory. The Stereotyped Task Engagement Process Model is presented. This model hypothesizes that performance goal adoption can offer insights into the potential multiple processes involved in stereotype-threat effects on performance.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., and Pittinsky, T. L. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychol. Sci. 12: 385-390.
American Psychological Society (1999). Denver, Colorado.
American Educational Research Association (1998). Chicago, Illinois.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. J. Educ. Psychol. 84: 261-271.
Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., and Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38: 113-125.
Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., and Brown, J. (1999). When White men can't do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35: 29-46.
Aronson, J., Quinn, D. M., and Spencer, S. J. (1998). Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. In Swim, J. K., and Stangor, C. (eds.), Prejudice: The Target's Perspective, Academic Press, New York, pp. 83-103.
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An Introduction to Motivation, Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ.
Atkinson, J. W., and Litwin, G. H. (1973). Achievement motive and test anxiety conceived as motive to approach success and motive to avoid failure. In McClelland, D. C., and Steele, R. S. (eds.), Human Motivation: A Book of Readings, General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ, pp. 145-230.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, W. H. Freeman, New York.
Barron, K. E., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 80: 706-720.
Begley, S. (2000, November 6). The stereotype trap. Newsweek pp. 66-68.
Benbow, C. P., and Stanley, J. C. (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: Fact or artifact?; Science, 210: 1262-1264.
Betz, N. E., and Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. J. Vocat. Behav. 23: 329-345.
Blanton, H., Crocker, J., and Miller, D. T. (2000). The effects of in-group versus out-group social comparison on self-esteem in the context of a negative stereotype. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 36: 519-530.
Blascovich, J., Spencer, S., Quinn, D., and Steele, C. (2001). African Americans and high blood pressure: The role of stereotype threat. Psychol. Sci. 12: 225-229.
Bong, M., and Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they?; Educ. Psychol. Rev. 15: 1-40.
Brown, R. P., and Josephs, R. A. (1999). A burden of proof: Stereotype relevance and gender differences in math performance. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 76: 246-257.
Cacioppo, J. T., and Tassinary, L. G. (1990). Inferring psychological significance from physiological signals. Am. Psychol. 45: 16-28
Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Frigerio, S., Impagliazzo, L., and Latinotti, S. (2003). Stereotype threat: The effect of expectancy on performance. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 33: 267-285.
Croizet, J. C., and Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 24: 588-594.
Cury, F., Elliot, A., Sarrazin, P., Fonseca, D. D., and Rufo, M. (2002). The trichotomous achievement goal model and intrinsic motivation: A sequential mediational analysis. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38: 473-481.
Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., and Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming Images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28: 1615-1628.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic Motivation, Plenum Press, New York.
Deci, E. L., and Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior, Plenum Press, New York.
Durik, A. M., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (2003). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: Coherence, concordance, and achievement orientation. J. Exp. Soc. Psych. 39: 378-385.
Dweck, C. S., and Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychol. Rev. 95: 256-273.
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women's educational and occupational choices. Psychol. Women Q. 18: 585-609.
Eccles, J. S., and Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53: 109-132.
Elliot, A. J., and Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 72: 218-232.
Elliot, A. J., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 70: 461-475.
Elliot, A. J., and McGregor, H. A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 76: 628-644.
Elliot, A. J., and McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 80: 501-519.
Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., and Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 91: 549-563.
Elliot, A. J., and Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 13: 139-156.
Eliott, E., and Dweck, C. (1998). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 54: 5-12.
Gendolla, G. H. E. (1998). Effort as assessed by motivational arousal in identify-relevant tasks. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 20: 111-121.
Gonzales, P. M., Blanton, H., and Williams, K. J. (2002). The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28: 659-670.
Harackiewicz, J. M., and Elliot, A. J. (1993). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 65: 904-915.
Harackiewicz, J. M., and Sansone, C. (2000). Rewarding competence: The importance of goals in the study of intrinsic motivation. In Sansone, C., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (eds.), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 82-103.
Hausdorff, J. M., Levy, B. R., and Wei, J. Y. (1999). The power of ageism on physical function of older persons: Reversibility of age-related gait changes. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 47: 1346-1349.
Hebl, M. R., Foster, J. B., Mannix, L. M., and Dovidio, J. F. (2002). Formal and interpersonal discrimination: A field study of bias toward homosexual applicants. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28: 815-825.
Heatherton, T. F., and Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 60: 895-910.
Hirt, E. R., Deppe, R. K., and Gordon, L. J. (1991). Self-reported versus behavioral self-handicapping: Empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 61: 981-991.
Hyde, J. S., and Kling, K. C. (2001). Women, motivation, and achievement. Psychol. Women Q. 25: 364-378.
Inzlicht, M., and Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychol. Sci. 11: 365-371.
Jacobs, J. E., and Eccles, J. S. (1992). The impact of mothers' gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers' and children's ability perceptions. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 63: 932-944.
James, K., and Greenberg, J. (1997). Beliefs about self and about gender groups: Interactive effects on the spatial performance of women. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 19: 411-425.
Jones, E. E., and Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 4: 200-206
Josephs, R. A., Newman, M. L., Brown, R. P., and Beer, J. M. (2003). Status, testosterone, and human intellectual performance: Stereotype threat as status concern. Psychol. Sci. 14: 158-163.
Judd, C. M., and Kenny, D. A. (1981). Estimating the Effects of Social Interventions, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Jussim, L., Palumbo, P., Chatman, C., Madon, S., and Smith, A. (2000). Stigma and self-fulfilling prophecies. In Heatherton, T. F., Kleck, R. E., Hebl, M. R., and Hull, J. G. (eds.), The Social Psychology of Stigma, The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 374-418.
Keller, J. (2002). Blatant stereotype threat and women's math performance: Self-handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance expectations. Sex Roles, 47: 193-198.
Keller, J., and Dauenheimer, D. (2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting effect on women's math performance. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29: 371-381.
Kray, L. J., Thompson, A., and Galinsky, A. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 80: 942-958.
Larkin, K. T., Ciano-Federoff, L. M., and Hammel, D. (1998). Effects of gender of observer and fear of negative evaluation on cardiovascular reactivity to mental stress in college men. Int. J. Psychophys. 29: 311-318.
Leary, M. R., and Shepperd, J. A. (1986). Behavioral self-handicaps versus self-reported handicaps: A conceptual note. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 51: 1265-1268.
Levy, B., and Langer, E. (1994). Aging free from negative stereotypes: Successful memory in China and among the American deaf. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 66: 989-997.
Leyens, J. P., Desert, M., Croizet, J. C., and Darcis, C. (2000). Stereotype threat: Are lower status and history of stigmatization preconditions of stereotype threat? Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26: 1189-1199.
Linnenbrink, E. A., and Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple pathways to learning and achievement: The role of goal orientation in fostering adaptive motivation, affect, and cognition. In Sansone, C., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (eds.), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 195-227.
Luhtanen, R., and Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one's social identity. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 18: 302-318.
Maehr, M. L., and Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming School Cultures, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
McIntyre, R. B., Paulson, R. M., and Lord, C. G. (2003). Alleviating women's mathematics stereotype threat though salience of group achievements. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 39: 83-90.
McKown, C., and Weinstein, R. S. (2003). The development and consequences of stereotype consciousness in middle childhood. Child Dev. 74(2): 498-515.
Molden, D. C., and Dweck, C. S. (2000). Meaning and motivation. In Sansone, C., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (eds.), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 131-159.
Mullen, B. (1986). Stuttering, audience size, and the other-total ratio: A self-attention perspective. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 12: 187-197.
Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychol. Rev. 91: 328-346.
Nisbett, R. E., and Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol. Rev. 84: 231-258.
O'brien, L. T., and Crandall, C. S. (2003). Stereotype threat and arousal: Effects on women's math performance. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 29: 782-789.
Osborne, J. W. (2001). Testing stereotype threat effects: Does anxiety explain race and sex differences in achievement? Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 26: 291-310.
Oswald, D. L., and Harvey, R. D. (2001). Hostile environments, stereotype threat, and math performance among undergraduate women. Curr. Psychol. 19(4): 338-356.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., and Zeidner, M. (eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 451-502.
Quinn, D. M., and Spencer, S. J. (2001). The interference of stereotype threat with women's generation of mathematical problem-solving strategies. J. Soc. Issues 57: 55-71.
Rahhal, T. A., Hasher, L., and Colcombe, S. J. (2001). Instructional manipulations and age differences in memory: Now you see them, now you don't. Psychol. Aging 16: 697-706.
Rawsthorne, R., and Elliot, A. J. (1999). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytical review. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 3: 326-344.
Rhodewalt, F., and Hill, S. K. (1995). Self-handicapping in the classroom: The effects of claimed self-handicaps on responses to academic failure. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 16: 397-416.
Rosenthal, R., and Jacobson, L. (1966). Teachers' expectancies: Determinants of pupils' IQ gains. Psychol. Rep. 19: 115-118.
Samuels, A. (2003, March 3). Time to tell it like it is. Newsweek pp. 52-55.
Sansone, C., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). “I don't feel like it”: The function of interest in self-regulation. In Martin, L. L., and Tesser, A. (eds.), Striving and Feeling: Interactions Among Goals, Affect, and Self-Regulation, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 203-228.
Sansone, C., and Smith, J. L. (2000). Interest and self-regulation: The relation between having to and wanting to. In Sansone, C., and Harackiewicz, J. M. (eds.), Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and performance, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 341-372.
Sarason, I. G. (1972). Experimental approaches to test anxiety: Attention and the uses of information. In Spielberger, C. D. (ed.), Anxiety: Current Trends in Theory and Research Vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 381-403.
Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. J. Educ. Psychol. 26: 299-323.
Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women's math performance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38: 194-201.
Sekaquaptewa, D., and Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women's performance. J Exp. Soc. Psychol. 39: 68-74.
Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., and Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychol. Sci. 10: 80-83.
Smith, J. L. (2004). The Interplay Among Stereotype Threat, Performance-Avoidance Goals, and Math Performance Expectancies. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Smith, J. L., and White, P. H. (2001). Development of the domain identification measure: A tool for investigating stereotype threat effects. Educ. Psychol. Measure. 61: 1040-1057.
Smith, J. L., and White, P. H. (2002). An examination of implicitly activated, explicitly activated, and nullified stereotypes on mathematical performance: It's not just a woman's issue. Sex Roles 47: 179-191.
Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., and Berscheid, E. (1977). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 35: 656-666.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., and Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35: 4-28.
Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., and Lushene, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Consulting Psychologist Press, Palo Alto, CA.
Stangor, C., Carr, C., and Kiang, L. (1998). Activating stereotypes undermines task performance expectations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 75: 1191-1197.
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Am. Psychol. 52: 613-629.
Steele, C. M. (1999, August). Thin ice: Stereotype threat and Black college students. Atlantic Monthly pp. 44-54.
Steele, C. M., and Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African-Americans. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 69: 797-811.
Stone, J. (2002). Battling doubt by avoiding practice: The effects of stereotype threat on self-handicapping in White athletes. Person. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28: 1667-1678.
Stone, J., Lynch, C. I., Sjomeling, M., and Darley, J. M. (1999). Stereotype threat effects on Black and White athletic performance. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 77: 1213-1227.
Tennyson, R. D., and Woolley, F. R. (1971). Interaction of anxiety with performance on two levels of task difficulty. J. Educ. Psychol. 62: 463-467.
Urdan, T., and Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 13: 115-138.
Walsh, M., Hickey, C., and Duffy, J. (1999). Influence of item content and stereotype situation on gender differences in mathematical problem solving. Sex Roles 41: 219-240.
Weiner, B. (1992). Human Motivation: Metaphors, Theories, and Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Wheeler, S. C., and Petty, R. E. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychol. Bull. 127: 797-826.
Wright, R., Contrada, R., and Patane, M. J. (1986). Task difficulty, cardiovascular response, and the magnitude of goal valence. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 51: 837-843.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, J.L. Understanding the Process of Stereotype Threat: A Review of Mediational Variables and New Performance Goal Directions. Educational Psychology Review 16, 177–206 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034020.20317.89
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034020.20317.89