Abstract
Many patients with atrial fibrillation develop symptoms attributable to the cardiac arrhythmia itself. These symptoms may be improved either by restoring sinus rhythm or by controlling the rapid and irregular ventricular response that often accompanies this arrhythmia. One of the principal goals of therapy of atrial fibrillation management is improvement of patient symptoms; it is important to quantify these symptoms by some form of quality of life analysis.
The Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation (CTAF) was a multi-centre randomized clinical trial of amiodarone compared with either propafenone or sotalol in patients with recent atrial fibrillation. The quality of life (QOL) substudy of CTAF was a prospective, comprehensive assessment of quality of life of patients enrolled in CTAF. Summary measures of physical and mental health on the generic QOL scale (SF-36) improved significantly with treatment from baseline to 3 months (41.9 ± 9.6 to 43.7 ± 9.2, p = 0.001 for the physical component and 47.5 ± 10.4 to 49.0 ± 9.8, p = 0.023 for the mental component). On an arrhythmia specific scale (SCL), a significant and larger improvement was noted from baseline to 3 months in both arrhythmia symptom frequency and severity (symptom frequency from 20.4 ± 9.4 to 16.2 ± 9.5, symptom severity from 16.7 ± 8.2 to 12.9 ± 7.6, both p < 0.001). The quality of life improvements were similar in the amiodarone group compared to the sotalol or propafenone groups, both for the SF-36 and the disease-specific symptom checklist (SCL) measures. In contrast, an atrial fibrillation severity scale (AFSS) did show differences between the assigned drug therapies, which were associated with different rates of arrhythmia recurrence in the parent study. By 3 months global well-being was significantly worse for patients who had recurrent atrial fibrillation compared to those who did not (6.9 ± 1.8 versus 7.4 ± 1.8, p = 0.04). Similarly, symptom severity at 3 months was 11.8 ± 7.4 for patients without recurrence, compared to 14.8 ± 7.4 for those with recurrence (p = 0.001). Interestingly, none of the usual clinical variables that might be perceived to be associated with quality of life, e.g., male versus female sex, age, NYHA class, beta blocker use, and ejection fraction, had much impact on subjective quality of life measures.
Quality of life improves with treatment atrial fibrillation and at least some of these improvements are related to the restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Roy D, Talajic M, Dorian P, Connolly S, Eisenberg MJ, Green M, Kus T, Lambert J, Dubuc M, Gagné P, Nattel S, Thibault B, for the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation (CTAF) Investigators. Amiodarone to prevent recurrence of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2000;342:913-920.
Dorian P, Jung W, Newman D, Paquette M, Wood K, Ayers G, Camm J, Akhtar M, Luderitz B. The impairment of healthrelated quality of life in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation: Implications for the assessment of investigational therapy. J Amer Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1303-1309.
Goldberg A, Menen M, Mickelsen S, MacIndoe C, Binder M, Nawman R, West G, Kusumoto FM. Atrial fibrillation ablation leads to long-term improvement of quality of life and reduced utilization of healthcare resources. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2003;8:59-64.
Spurrell P, Mitchell A, Kamalvand K, Sulke N. Quality of life after use of the patient activated atrial defibrillator. Int J Clin Pract 2003;57:30-34.
Kay GN, Ellenbogen KA, Giudici M, Redfield MM, Jenkins LS, Mianulli M, Wilkoff B. The Ablate and Pace Trial: A prospective study of catheter ablation of the AV conduction system and permanent pacemaker implantation for treatment of atrial fibrillation. APT Investigators. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 1998;2(2):121-135.
Weerasooriya R, Davis M, Powell A, Szili-Torok T, Shah C, Whalley D, Kanagaratnam L, Heddle W, Leitch J, Perks A, Ferguson L, Bulsara M. The Australian Intervention Randomized Control of Rate in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (AIRCRAFT). J AmColl Cardiol 2003;41:1697-1702.
Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y, Schron EB, Kellen JC, Greene HL, Mickel MC, Dalquist JE, Corley SD; Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347(23):1825-1833.
Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Lilienthal J. Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation-pharmacological intervention in atrial fibrillation (PIAF): A randomised trial. Lancet 2000;356:1789-1794.
Carlsson J, Miketic S, Windeler J, Cuneo A, Haun S, Micus S, Walter S, Tebbe U; STAF Investigators. Randomized trial of rate-control versus rhythm-control in persistent atrial fibrillation: The strategies of treatment of atrial fibrillation (STAF) study. J AmColl Cardiol 2003;41:1690-1696.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dorian, P., Mangat, I. Quality of Life Variables in the Selection of Rate Versus Rhythm Control in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Observations from the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation. Card Electrophysiol Rev 7, 276–279 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CEPR.0000012395.33292.cd
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CEPR.0000012395.33292.cd