Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment Strategies for Juvenile Delinquency: Alternative Solutions

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social workers involved in the treatment of adjudicated youth commonly encounter youth sentenced to traditional incarceration or parole as a path to rehabilitation. This article examines alternative treatment strategies for adjudicated youth, namely Victim Offender Reconciliation Programs (often called mediation), Boot Camps, and Wrap-Around Community-Based Care, to help these youth avoid reoffending. While popular with the media, policymakers, or the general public, an evaluation of the literature makes it clear that these programs do not necessarily guarantee lower recidivism rates for program participants. It is evident that further research and evaluation must be done in order to more fully understand the drawbacks and benefits of alternative strategies, and to more appropriately help adjudicated youth and their communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Chapter © 2017

References

  • Bazemore, G. & Umbreit, M. (1995). Rethinking the sanctioning function in juvenile court: Retributive or restorative responses to youth crime. Crime and Delinquency 41(3), 296–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J.C., & Vito, G.F. An impact analysis of the Alabama boot camp program. Federal Probation 59(1), 63–67.

  • Burton, V.S., Marquart, J.W., Cuvelier, S.J., Alaird, L.F., & Hunter, R.J. (1993). A study of attitudinal change among boot camp participants. Federal Probation 57(3), 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R.T., Schaefer, M., Burchard, J.D., & Welkowitz, J.W. (1992). Wrapping community-based mental health services around children with a severe behavioral disorder: An evaluation of Project Wraparound.Journal of Child and Family Studies 1(3), 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, M.M. & Harnett, J.M. (1995).The role of the volunteer in family-preservation services. Journal of Contemporary Human Services 2, 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elrod, P. & Kelley, D. (1995).The ideological context of changing juvenile justice. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 22(2), 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaway, B. (1988). Crime victim and offender mediation as a social work strategy. Social Service Review 62(4), 668–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J., Kostelny, K. & Dubrow, N. (1991). What children tell us about living in danger. American Psychologist 46, 376–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M.B. (1993). Chronic exposure to violence and poverty: Interventions that work for youth. Crime and Delinquency 39(1), 106–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krisberg, B. (1994). Distorted by fear: The make believe war on crime. Social Justice 21(3), 38–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krisberg, F., Schwartz, I.M., Litsky, P., & Austin, J. (1986). The watershed of juvenile justice reform. Crime and Delinquency 32(1), 5–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lab, S.P. & Whitehead, J.T. (1988). An analysis of juvenile correctional treatment. Crime and Delinquency 34(1), 60–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D.L. (1990). Boot camp prisons: Components, evaluations, and empirical issues. Federal Probation 54(3), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D.L. (1991). Boot camp survey: Rehabilitation, recidivism reduction outrank punishment as main goals. Corrections Today 53, 90–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D.L. (1994). Results of a multisite study of boot camp prisons. Federal Probation 58(2), 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathlas, R.E. & Mathews, J.W. (1991). The boot camp program for offenders: Does the shoe fit? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 35(4), 322–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morash, M. & Rucker, L. (1990). A critical look at the idea of boot camp as a correctional reform. Crime & Delinquency 36(2), 204–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.E. (1990). Family-based services for juvenile offenders. Children and Youth Services Review 12, 193–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K.E., Landsman, M.J., & Deutelbaum, W. (1990). Three models of family-centered placement prevention services. Child Welfare 69(1), 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemeyer, M. & Shichor, D. (1996). A preliminary study of a large victim/offender reconciliation program. Federal Probation 60(3), 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northey, W.F., Primer, V., & Christensen, L. (1997). Promoting justice in the delivery of services to juvenile delinquents: The ecosystemic natural wrap-around model. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 14(1), 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, W.R., & Paddock, J.B. (1996). Evaluating the effects of a victim-offender reconciliation program on reoffense. Research on social work practice 6(2), 155–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osler, M.W. (1991). Shock incarceration: Hard realities and real possibilities. Federal Probation 55(1), 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, M., Thomas, D., & Zamberlan, C. (1997). Boot Camps for Juvenile Offenders. Washington, D.C.: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.

  • Rosen, L.D., Heckman, T., Carro, M.G., & Burchard, J.D. (1994). Satisfaction, involvement, and unconditional care: The perceptions of children and adolescents receiving wraparound services. Journal of Child and Family Studies 3(1), 55–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, I.M., Guo, S., & Kerbs, J.J. (1993). The impact of demographic variables on public opinion regarding juvenile justice: Implications for public policy. Crime and Delinquency 39(1), 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severson, M.M. & Bankston, T.V. (1995). Social work and the pursuit of justice through mediation. Social Work 40(5), 683–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone, M.V. (1984). Group home failures in juvenile justice: The next step. Child Welfare 64(4), 357–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.K. (1995). Utilization-focused evaluation of a family preservation program. The Journal of Contemporary Human Services 1, 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbreit, M.S. (1989). Crime victims seeking fairness, not revenge: Toward restorative justice. Federal Probation 53(3), 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbreit, M.S. (1991). Mediation of youth conflict: A multi-system perspective. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 8(2), 141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbreit, M.S. (1993). Crime victims and offenders in mediation: An emerging area of social work practice. Social Work 38(1), 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbreit, M.S. (1994). Crime victims confront their offenders: The impact of a Minneapolis mediation program. Research on Social Work Practice 4(4), 436–447.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mandel School of Applied Social Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

    Kimberly Flash

Authors
  1. Kimberly Flash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flash, K. Treatment Strategies for Juvenile Delinquency: Alternative Solutions. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal 20, 509–527 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CASW.0000003141.15723.a5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CASW.0000003141.15723.a5

Search

Navigation