Abstract
Previous studies on breast cancer recurrence provide a mixed picture of the quality of life of women following a recurrence. To clarify the picture, the present study addresses some previous methodological concerns by offering a multidimensional assessment with follow-up, a matched comparison group of disease-free survivors, and a closer look at the nature of recurrence (local versus metastatic). Fifty-Four of 817 women who participated in an earlier study experienced a recurrence at follow-up, and are compared to a matched sample of 54 women who remained disease-free. Analyses indicate that women who had a recurrence report significantly poorer functioning on various health-related quality of life (HRQOL) domains compared to women who remained disease-free. However, the differences appear to be largely due to the poorer HRQOL of women with metastatic disease. Although women who had a recurrence report good mood, low stress, and good quality of interpersonal relationships, they report significantly higher cancer-specific stress compared to disease-free women at follow-up. Women who had a recurrence also report experiencing both more meaning and vulnerability as a result of breast cancer than disease-free women, but report similar levels of spirituality and benefit-finding at follow-up as disease-free women. These results suggest that although women report relatively good psychosocial adjustment following a recurrence, cancer-specific domains of quality of life are most likely to be negatively affected. These results may be useful in identifying individuals with breast cancer recurrences who are most in need of psychosocial services.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Silverfarb PM, Maurer LH, Crouthamel CS: Psychosocial aspects of neoplastic disease: I. Functional status of breast cancer patients during different treatment regimens. Am J Psychiatry 137: 450–455, 1980
Northouse LL, Laten D, Reddy P: Adjustment of women and their husbands to recurrent breast cancer. Res Nurs Health 18: 515–524, 1995
McEnvoy MD, McCorkle R: Quality of life issues in patients with disseminated breast cancer. Cancer 66 (6 Suppl.): 1416–1421, 1990
Mahon SM, Cella DF, Donovan MI: Psychosocial adjustment to recurrent cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 17: 47–52, 1990
Ballard A, Green T, McCaa A, Logsdon MC: A comparison of the level of hope in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 24: 899–904, 1997
Weisman AD, Worden JW: The emotional impact of recurrent cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 3: 5–16, 1986
Given B, Given CW: Patient and family caregiver reaction to new and recurrent breast cancer. J Am Med Womens Assoc 47: 201–206, 212, 1992
Munkres A, Oberst MT, Hughes SH: Appraisal of illness, symptom distress, self-care burden, and mood states in patients receiving chemotherapy for initial and recurrent cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 19: 1201–1209, 1992
Frost MH, Suman VJ, Rummans TA, Dose AM, Taylor M, Novotny P, Johnson R, Evans, RE: Physical, psychological and social well-being of women with breast cancer: the inffuence of disease phase. Psychooncology 9: 221–231, 2000
Le MG, Arriagada R, Spielmann M, Guinebretiere JM, Rochard F: Prognostic factors for death after an isolated local recurrence in patients with early stage breast carcinoma. Cancer 94: 2813–2820, 2000
Bull AA, Meyerowitz BE, Hart S, Mosconi P, Apolone G, Liberati A: Quality of life in women with recurrent breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 54: 47–57, 1999
Hurney C, Bernhard J, Coates AS, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Peterson HF, Gelber RD, Forbes JF, Rudenstam C-M, Simoncini E, Crivellari D, Goldhirsch A, Senn H-J, for the International Breast Cancer Study Group: impact of adjuvant therapy on quality of life in women with node-positive breast cancer. Lancet 347: 1279–1284, 1996
Jenkins PL, May VE, Hughes LE: Psychological morbidity associated with local recurrence of breast cancer. Int J Psychiatry Med 21: 149–155, 1991
Okamura H, Watanabe T, Narabayashi M, Katsumata N, Ando M, Adachi I, Akechi T, Uchitomi Y: Psychological distress following rst recurrence of diseasein patients with breast cancer: prevalence and risk factors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 61: 131–137, 2000
Northouse LL, Mood D, Kershaw T, Schafenacker A, Mellon S, Walker J, Galvin E, Decker V: Quality of life of women with recurrent breast cancer and their family members. J Clin Oncol 20: 4050–4064, 2002
Lewis FM, Deal LW: Balancing our lives: a study of the married couple 's experience with breast cancer recurrence. Oncol Nurs Forum 22: 943–953, 1995
Taylor EJ: Factors associated with meaning in life among people with recurrent cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 20: 1399–1405, 1993
Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Leedham B, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR: Quality of life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: a follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1: 39–49, 1994
Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, Wyatt GE: Life after breast cancer: understanding women 's health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol 16: 501–514, 1998
Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Meyerowitz BE, Desmond KA: Impact of different adjuvant therapy strategies on quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Recent Results Cancer Res 152: 396–411, 1998
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30: 473–483, 1992
Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM: The RAND 36-item Health Survey1. 0. Health Econ 2: 217–227, 1993
McHorney CA, Kosinski M, Ware JE Jr: Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care 32: 551–567, 1994
Ware JE Jr, Kosinki M, Keller SD: SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User 's Manual. The Health Institute, Boston, MA, 1994
RadloffLS: The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Measure 1: 385–401, 1977
Roberts RE, Vernon SW: The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale: its use in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry 140: 41–46, 1983
Myers JK, Weissman MM: Use of a self-report symptom scale to detect depression in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry 137: 1081–1084, 1980
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 54: 1063–1070, 1988
Weiss DS, Marmar CR: The impact of event scale-revised. In: Wilson JP, Keane TM (eds) Assessing Psychological Trauma. Guilford Press, New York, 1997, pp 399–411
Busby DM, Christensen C, Crane DR, Larson JH: A revision of the dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. J Marital Fam Ther 21: 289–308, 1995
Spanier GB: Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Family 38: 15–28, 1976
Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL: The MOS Social Support Survey. Soc Sci Med 32: 705–714, 1991
Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG: The post-traumatic growth inventory. J Trauma Stress 9: 455–472, 1996
Holland J, Kash KM, Passik S, Gronert MK, Sison A, Lederberg M, Russak SM, Baider L, Fox B: A brief spiritual beliefs inventory for use in quality of life research in lifethreatening illnesses. Psychooncology 7: 460–469, 1998
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oh, S., Heflin, L., Meyerowitz, B.E. et al. Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Survivors After a Recurrence: A Follow-Up Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 87, 45–57 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BREA.0000041580.55817.5a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BREA.0000041580.55817.5a