Abstract
Objective: To explore the experience and practice of students entering a problem-based (PBL) medical undergraduate course and to identify contributory social, curricular and contextual factors.
Design: A multiple case study exploiting the natural experimental features of the setting. Qualitative data collection methods, including participant observation, interviews and focus groups were supplemented by a survey.
Setting: The medical school at the University of Liverpool between 1996 and 1998, which launched an integrated PBL curriculum inline with recommendations of the General Medical Council of the UK.
Participants: Two successive cohorts of first year medical students entering the PBL course.
Results: The first case study findings demonstrated student insecurity and dependence on the faculty resources rather than conforming to PBL principles. Uncertainty gradually diminished but resource dependence persisted, endorsed by peer interaction. Survey results confirmed the qualitative findings. The hypotheses raised for the second case study predicted replications of resource dependent learning, social influences and initial insecurity. Only the first two were upheld. Second year students' advice on textbooks undercut initial uncertainty but insecurity and social comparison reappeared following the changeover of PBL groups and tutors in the second semester. Survey results were replicated.
Conclusion: Student learning was socially agreed amongst the peer group and directed by faculty given resources. It was not self-directed. Claims made for PBL type curricula may not be justified and GMC recommendations may remain unfulfilled without rigorous attention to educational principles.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine 68(1): 52-81.
Armstrong, A.G. (1991). A hybrid model of problem-based learning. In D. Boud & G. Felletti (eds.), The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning, 137-149. London: Kogan Page.
Barrows, H.S. (1988). The Tutorial Process. Springfield, Illinois: Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Barrows, H.S. & Tamblyn, R.N. (1980). Problem-Based Learning. An Approach to Medical Education, 1st edn. New York: Springer.
Berkson, L. (1993). Problem-based learning; have the expectations been met? Academic Medicine 68(10): S79-S88.
Bligh, J., Lloyd-Jones, G. & Smith, G. (2000). Early effects of a new problem-based clinically orientated curriculum on students' perceptions of teaching. Medical Education 34(6): 487-490.
Blumberg, P. (2000). Evaluating the evidence that problem-based learners are self-directed learners: a review of the literature. In D.H. Evenson & C.E. Hmelo (eds.), Problem-Based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions, 199-226. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Colliver, J.A. (2000). Effectiveness of Problem-based learning curricula: research and theory. Academic Medicine 75(3): 259-266.
Dolmans, D.H.J.M. & Schmidt, H.G. (1994). What drives the student in problem-based learning? Medical Education 28: 372-380.
General Medical Council (1993). Tomorrow's Doctors. London: General Medical Council.
Gomm, R., Hammersley, M. & Foster, P. (2000). Case study and generalisation. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley & P. Foster (eds.), Case Study Method, 98-115. London: Sage Publications.
Hak, T. & Maguire, P. (2000). Group process; the black box of studies on problem-based learning. Academic Medicine 75(7): 85-88.
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
Hammersley, M., Gomm, R. & Foster, P. (2000). Case study and theory. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley & P. Foster (eds.), Case Study Method, 234-258. London: Sage Publications.
Lloyd-Jones, G. (2002). A multiple case study of the first year student perspective in a medical undergraduate PBL curriculum. Doctoral Thesis, University of Liverpool, Department of Primary Care, Liverpool.
Lloyd-Jones, G., Fowell, S. & Bligh, J.G. (1999). The use of the nominal group technique as an evaluation tool in medical undergraduate education. Medical Education 33: 8-13.
Maxwell, J.A. (1996). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
Norman, G.R. & Schmidt, H.G. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts. Medical Education 34: 721-728.
Schmidt, H.G. (1983). Problem-based learning: rationale and description. Medical Education 17: 11-16.
Schmidt, H.G. & Moust, J.H.C. (2000). Factors affecting small-group tutorial learning: a review of research. In D.H. Evenson & C.E. Hmelo (eds.), Problem Based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions, 19-51. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
van den Hurk, M.M., Wolfhagen, I.H.A.P., Dolmans, D.H.J.M. & van der Vleuten, C.P.M. (1999). The impact of student-generated learning issues on individual study time and academic achievement. Medical Education 33: 808-814.
Vernon, D.T. & Blake, R.L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine 68(7): 550-563.
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case Study Research Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lloyd-Jones, G., Hak, T. Self-Directed Learning and Student Pragmatism. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 9, 61–73 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AHSE.0000012228.72071.1e
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AHSE.0000012228.72071.1e