Abstract
This study compared key psychometric properties of the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) and the Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF) and explored their convergent validity. Twenty adults with mental retardation and problem behaviors (aggression, self-injury, or property destruction) and 31 respondents participated. Test–retest reliability of the subscales in both scales was good to excellent (Cicchetti, D. V., 1994, Psychol. Assess. 6: 284–290), and—except for 1 QABF subscale—internal consistency was good considering the small number of items and the purpose of the scale. Consistent with some earlier studies, interrater reliability was less satisfactory with both scales falling only into the fair to good range.Correlations between functionally equivalent subscales were statistically significant and were generally higher than correlations between nonequivalent subscales. The QABF and the MAS were found to be comparable in terms of the assessed reliabilities, and both instruments appear to be measuring very similar constructs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bihm, E. M., Kienlen, T. L., Ness, M. E., and Poindexter, A. R. (1991). Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale for persons with mental retardation. Psychol. Rep. 68: 1235-1238.
Carr, E. G. (1977). The motivation of self-injurious behavior: A review of some hypotheses. Psychol. Bull. 84: 800-816.
Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol. Assess. 6: 284-290.
Duker, P. C., and Sigafoos, J. (1998). The Motivation Assessment Scale: Reliability and construct validity across three topographies of behavior. Res. Dev. Disabil. 19: 131-141.
Durand, M. V., and Crimmins, D. B. (1983). A preliminary report on an instrument which assesses the functional significance of children's deviant behavior. Paper Presented at the Berkshire Association for Behavior Analysis and Therapy, Amherst, MA.
Durand, M. V., and Crimmins, D. B. (1988). Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 18: 99-117.
Hauck, F. (1985). Development of a behavior-analytic questionnaire precising four functions of self-injurious behavior in the mentally retarded. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 8: 350-352.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., and Richman, G. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Anal. Intervention Dev. Disabil. 2: 3-20.
Matson, J. L., and Vollmer, T. R. (1995). The Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF) User's Guide, Scientific Publishers, Baton Rouge, LA.
Newton, J. T., and Sturmey, P. (1991). The Motivation Assessment Scale: Interrater reliability and internal consistency in a British sample. J. Ment. Deficiency Res. 35: 472-474.
Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric Theory, McGraw Hill, New York.
Paclawskyj, T. R., Matson, J. L., Rush, K. S., Smalls, Y., and Vollmer, T. R. (2000). Questions about behavior function (QABF): A behavioral checklist for functional assessment of aberrant behavior. Res. Dev. Disabil. 21: 223-229.
Paclawskyj, T. R., Matson, J. L., Rush, K. S., Smalls, Y., and Vollmer, T. R. (2001). Assessment of the convergent validity of the Questions About Behavioral Function scale with analogue functional analysis and the Motivation Assessment Scale. J. Intellectual Disabil. Res. 45: 484-494.
Reiss, S. (1988). Test Manual for the Reiss Screen for Maladaptive Behavior, International Diagnostic Systems, Columbus, OH.
Shrout, P. E., and Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull. 86: 420-428.
Sigafoos, J., Kerr, M., and Roberts, D. (1994). Interrater reliability of the Motivation Assessment Scale: Failure to replicate with aggressive behavior. Res. Dev. Disabil. 15: 333-342.
Spreat, S., and Connelly, L. (1996). Reliability analysis of the Motivation Assessment Scale. Am. J. Ment. Retard. 100: 528-532.
Sturmey, P. (1994). Assessing the functions of aberrant behaviors: A review of psychometric instruments. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 24: 293-304.
Thompson, S., and Emerson, E. (1995). Inter-observer agreement on the Motivation Assessment Scale: Another failure to replicate. Ment. Handicap Res. 8: 203-208.
Van Houten, R., and Rolider, A. (1991). Applied behavior analysis. In Matson, J. L., and Mulick, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of Mental Retardation, 2nd edn., Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 569-585.
Wieseler, N. A., Hanson, R. H., Chamberlain, T. P., and Thompson, T. (1985). Functional taxonomy of stereotypic and self-injurious behavior. Ment. Retard. 23: 230-234.
Zarcone, J. A., Rodgers, T. A., Iwata, B. A., Rourke, D. A., and Dorsey, M. F. (1991). Reliability analysis of the Motivation Assessment Scale: A failure to replicate. Res. Dev. Disabil. 12: 349-360.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shogren, K.A., Rojahn, J. Convergent Reliability and Validity of the Questions About Behavioral Function and the Motivation Assessment Scale: A Replication Study. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 15, 367–375 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026314316977
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026314316977